Neil Osterweil

FROM AACR 2023

Systemic therapy prior to surgery has been slow to catch on in the treatment of patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily out of concern that neoadjuvant therapy could delay surgery or render patients ineligible for resection.

That may change, however, in light of new data from the phase 3 AEGEAN trial.

AEGEAN showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with durvalumab (Imfinzi) and chemotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in pathologic complete response rates and event-free survival, compared with neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant placebo, and it did not affect patients’ ability to undergo surgery.

The event-free survival benefit among patients who received durvalumab translated to a 32% reduction in the risk of recurrence, recurrence precluding definitive surgery, or death, John V. Heymach, MD, reported in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

“Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a potential new treatment for patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer,” said Dr. Heymach, chair of thoracic/head and neck medical oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

The AEGEAN findings confirm the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that were first seen on a large scale in the Checkmate 816 study, which was reported at last year’s AACR annual meeting.

In Checkmate 816, adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a 14-fold greater likelihood of a pathologic complete response compared with chemotherapy alone.

“I’m impressed by the fact that we now have a second study that shows the benefits of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, along with several adjuvant studies,” the invited discussant, Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, deputy director of the Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Conn., said in an interview. “There’s no doubt that in early lung cancer, resectable disease, immunotherapy is part of the equation.”

For the current study, Dr. Heymach and colleagues recruited 802 patients from 222 sites in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. The patients had NSCLC and were treatment-naive, regardless of programmed cell death–ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression.

After excluding patients with targetable EGFR/ALK alterations, the team randomly allocated 740 patients who had good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1) to receive either neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy plus adjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Overall, 77.6% of patients in the treatment arm and 76.7% of patients in the placebo arm underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy.

At the trial’s first planned interim analysis, for patients assigned to preoperative durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and postoperative durvalumab, the 12-month event-free survival rate was 73.4%, compared with 64.5% for patients who received chemotherapy alone before and placebo after surgery (stratified P = .003902).

The other endpoint, pathologic complete response, was observed in 17.2% of patients in the durvalumab arm, vs. 4.3% in the control arm – a 13% difference (P = .000036). Major pathologic responses, a secondary efficacy endpoint, were seen in 33.3% and 12.3% of patients, respectively.

The benefits of durvalumab were consistent across all subgroups, including those based on age at randomization, sex, performance status, race, smoking, histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), disease stage, baseline PD-L1 expression, and planned neoadjuvant agent.

The safety profile of durvalumab plus chemotherapy was manageable, and the addition of durvalumab did not affect patients’ ability to complete four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Dr. Heymach said.

Are these data practice changing?

Dr. Herbst gave a “resounding ‘Yes.’ “

But while the AEGEAN protocol represents a new standard of care, it can’t yet be labeled the standard of care, Dr. Herbst explained.

Dr. Herbst emphasized that, because this regimen was not compared against the current standard of care, it’s “impossible to determine” whether this is indeed the new standard.

“The data are early, and additional maturity is needed to better understand the benefit of the extra adjuvant therapy, and we’ll await the survival results,” he said.

It will also be important to analyze why some patients have only minor responses with the addition of durvalumab and whether there are resistance mechanisms at play for these patients. That would be a great setting “to start to test new therapies in a personalized way,” Dr. Herbst said.

Dr. Heymach and Dr. Herbst disclosed ties to AstraZeneca, which funded the study.
 

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

FROM AACR 2023

Systemic therapy prior to surgery has been slow to catch on in the treatment of patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily out of concern that neoadjuvant therapy could delay surgery or render patients ineligible for resection.

That may change, however, in light of new data from the phase 3 AEGEAN trial.

AEGEAN showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with durvalumab (Imfinzi) and chemotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in pathologic complete response rates and event-free survival, compared with neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant placebo, and it did not affect patients’ ability to undergo surgery.

The event-free survival benefit among patients who received durvalumab translated to a 32% reduction in the risk of recurrence, recurrence precluding definitive surgery, or death, John V. Heymach, MD, reported in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

“Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a potential new treatment for patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer,” said Dr. Heymach, chair of thoracic/head and neck medical oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

The AEGEAN findings confirm the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that were first seen on a large scale in the Checkmate 816 study, which was reported at last year’s AACR annual meeting.

In Checkmate 816, adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a 14-fold greater likelihood of a pathologic complete response compared with chemotherapy alone.

“I’m impressed by the fact that we now have a second study that shows the benefits of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, along with several adjuvant studies,” the invited discussant, Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, deputy director of the Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Conn., said in an interview. “There’s no doubt that in early lung cancer, resectable disease, immunotherapy is part of the equation.”

For the current study, Dr. Heymach and colleagues recruited 802 patients from 222 sites in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. The patients had NSCLC and were treatment-naive, regardless of programmed cell death–ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression.

After excluding patients with targetable EGFR/ALK alterations, the team randomly allocated 740 patients who had good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1) to receive either neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy plus adjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Overall, 77.6% of patients in the treatment arm and 76.7% of patients in the placebo arm underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy.

At the trial’s first planned interim analysis, for patients assigned to preoperative durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and postoperative durvalumab, the 12-month event-free survival rate was 73.4%, compared with 64.5% for patients who received chemotherapy alone before and placebo after surgery (stratified P = .003902).

The other endpoint, pathologic complete response, was observed in 17.2% of patients in the durvalumab arm, vs. 4.3% in the control arm – a 13% difference (P = .000036). Major pathologic responses, a secondary efficacy endpoint, were seen in 33.3% and 12.3% of patients, respectively.

The benefits of durvalumab were consistent across all subgroups, including those based on age at randomization, sex, performance status, race, smoking, histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), disease stage, baseline PD-L1 expression, and planned neoadjuvant agent.

The safety profile of durvalumab plus chemotherapy was manageable, and the addition of durvalumab did not affect patients’ ability to complete four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Dr. Heymach said.

Are these data practice changing?

Dr. Herbst gave a “resounding ‘Yes.’ “

But while the AEGEAN protocol represents a new standard of care, it can’t yet be labeled the standard of care, Dr. Herbst explained.

Dr. Herbst emphasized that, because this regimen was not compared against the current standard of care, it’s “impossible to determine” whether this is indeed the new standard.

“The data are early, and additional maturity is needed to better understand the benefit of the extra adjuvant therapy, and we’ll await the survival results,” he said.

It will also be important to analyze why some patients have only minor responses with the addition of durvalumab and whether there are resistance mechanisms at play for these patients. That would be a great setting “to start to test new therapies in a personalized way,” Dr. Herbst said.

Dr. Heymach and Dr. Herbst disclosed ties to AstraZeneca, which funded the study.
 

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

FROM AACR 2023

Systemic therapy prior to surgery has been slow to catch on in the treatment of patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily out of concern that neoadjuvant therapy could delay surgery or render patients ineligible for resection.

That may change, however, in light of new data from the phase 3 AEGEAN trial.

AEGEAN showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with durvalumab (Imfinzi) and chemotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in pathologic complete response rates and event-free survival, compared with neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant placebo, and it did not affect patients’ ability to undergo surgery.

The event-free survival benefit among patients who received durvalumab translated to a 32% reduction in the risk of recurrence, recurrence precluding definitive surgery, or death, John V. Heymach, MD, reported in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

“Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a potential new treatment for patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer,” said Dr. Heymach, chair of thoracic/head and neck medical oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

The AEGEAN findings confirm the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that were first seen on a large scale in the Checkmate 816 study, which was reported at last year’s AACR annual meeting.

In Checkmate 816, adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a 14-fold greater likelihood of a pathologic complete response compared with chemotherapy alone.

“I’m impressed by the fact that we now have a second study that shows the benefits of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, along with several adjuvant studies,” the invited discussant, Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, deputy director of the Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Conn., said in an interview. “There’s no doubt that in early lung cancer, resectable disease, immunotherapy is part of the equation.”

For the current study, Dr. Heymach and colleagues recruited 802 patients from 222 sites in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. The patients had NSCLC and were treatment-naive, regardless of programmed cell death–ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression.

After excluding patients with targetable EGFR/ALK alterations, the team randomly allocated 740 patients who had good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1) to receive either neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy plus adjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Overall, 77.6% of patients in the treatment arm and 76.7% of patients in the placebo arm underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy.

At the trial’s first planned interim analysis, for patients assigned to preoperative durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and postoperative durvalumab, the 12-month event-free survival rate was 73.4%, compared with 64.5% for patients who received chemotherapy alone before and placebo after surgery (stratified P = .003902).

The other endpoint, pathologic complete response, was observed in 17.2% of patients in the durvalumab arm, vs. 4.3% in the control arm – a 13% difference (P = .000036). Major pathologic responses, a secondary efficacy endpoint, were seen in 33.3% and 12.3% of patients, respectively.

The benefits of durvalumab were consistent across all subgroups, including those based on age at randomization, sex, performance status, race, smoking, histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), disease stage, baseline PD-L1 expression, and planned neoadjuvant agent.

The safety profile of durvalumab plus chemotherapy was manageable, and the addition of durvalumab did not affect patients’ ability to complete four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Dr. Heymach said.

Are these data practice changing?

Dr. Herbst gave a “resounding ‘Yes.’ “

But while the AEGEAN protocol represents a new standard of care, it can’t yet be labeled the standard of care, Dr. Herbst explained.

Dr. Herbst emphasized that, because this regimen was not compared against the current standard of care, it’s “impossible to determine” whether this is indeed the new standard.

“The data are early, and additional maturity is needed to better understand the benefit of the extra adjuvant therapy, and we’ll await the survival results,” he said.

It will also be important to analyze why some patients have only minor responses with the addition of durvalumab and whether there are resistance mechanisms at play for these patients. That would be a great setting “to start to test new therapies in a personalized way,” Dr. Herbst said.

Dr. Heymach and Dr. Herbst disclosed ties to AstraZeneca, which funded the study.
 

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Current U.S., European, and Australian guidelines recommend 10-mm safety margins for radical excision of primary melanomas, but for patients with early-stage cutaneous melanoma in critical areas of the body, excision with 5-mm margins may not significantly increase risk for recurrence or melanoma-specific mortality (MSM), results of a retrospective study suggest.

Among 1,179 patients with stage T1a melanomas near the face, scalp, external genitalia, or other critical areas, the weighted 10-year local recurrence rate for patients who underwent resection with 10-mm margins was 5.7%, compared with 6.7% for those who had resections with 5-mm margins, a nonsignificant difference.

Weighted 10-year melanoma-specific mortality was 1.8% for patients treated with wide margins, vs. 4.2% for those treated with narrow margins, also a nonsignificant difference. Patients treated with narrow margins did have significantly fewer reconstructive surgeries than patients treated with wide margins, reported Andrea Maurichi, MD, and colleagues at the National Cancer Institute of Italy in Milan.

“Because this association was found in melanomas of the head and neck, acral, and genital sites, there is no plausible reason why it could not be extrapolated to other locations. The findings also support the need for prospective randomized clinical trials to definitively answer the important question about appropriate excision margins for T1a melanoma,” they wrote in the study, published online in JAMA Dermatology.

The authors also found, however, that Breslow thickness greater than 0.4 mm and mitotic rate greater than 1/mm­­² were associated with worse MSM, and that acral lentiginous melanoma, lentigo maligna melanoma, and increasing Breslow thickness were associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence.

A melanoma expert who was not involved in the study said that despite these findings, wider margins are always preferable.

“There is always a conversation around these general [critical] areas, but as a rule we try to get larger margins,” said Ryan J. Sullivan, MD, of Mass General Cancer Center in Boston.

In an interview, Dr. Sullivan said that the finding about lower frequency of reconstructive procedures in the narrow margins groups may be more of a concern for younger patients than for the elderly.

Study design

The investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 18 or older at the National Cancer Institute of Milan who were diagnosed with T1a cutaneous melanoma close to critical areas from 2001 through 2020.

Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and face areas with functional or cosmetic considerations, acral areas (plantar, palmar, digital and interdigital areas), external genitalia, or periumbilical and perineal areas were eligible for inclusion.

The cohort comprised 1,179 patients with a median age of 50 and equal sex distribution. Of these patients, 626 (53%) had a wide excision, of whom 434 had a linear repair, and 192 had a flap of graft reconstruction. The remaining 553 patients had narrow excisions, 491 with linear repair, and 62 with flap or graft reconstruction.

Analyses were adjusted to account for imbalances between the surgical groups.

The study was supported by the nonprofit foundation Emme Rouge. The authors and Dr. Sullivan reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Current U.S., European, and Australian guidelines recommend 10-mm safety margins for radical excision of primary melanomas, but for patients with early-stage cutaneous melanoma in critical areas of the body, excision with 5-mm margins may not significantly increase risk for recurrence or melanoma-specific mortality (MSM), results of a retrospective study suggest.

Among 1,179 patients with stage T1a melanomas near the face, scalp, external genitalia, or other critical areas, the weighted 10-year local recurrence rate for patients who underwent resection with 10-mm margins was 5.7%, compared with 6.7% for those who had resections with 5-mm margins, a nonsignificant difference.

Weighted 10-year melanoma-specific mortality was 1.8% for patients treated with wide margins, vs. 4.2% for those treated with narrow margins, also a nonsignificant difference. Patients treated with narrow margins did have significantly fewer reconstructive surgeries than patients treated with wide margins, reported Andrea Maurichi, MD, and colleagues at the National Cancer Institute of Italy in Milan.

“Because this association was found in melanomas of the head and neck, acral, and genital sites, there is no plausible reason why it could not be extrapolated to other locations. The findings also support the need for prospective randomized clinical trials to definitively answer the important question about appropriate excision margins for T1a melanoma,” they wrote in the study, published online in JAMA Dermatology.

The authors also found, however, that Breslow thickness greater than 0.4 mm and mitotic rate greater than 1/mm­­² were associated with worse MSM, and that acral lentiginous melanoma, lentigo maligna melanoma, and increasing Breslow thickness were associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence.

A melanoma expert who was not involved in the study said that despite these findings, wider margins are always preferable.

“There is always a conversation around these general [critical] areas, but as a rule we try to get larger margins,” said Ryan J. Sullivan, MD, of Mass General Cancer Center in Boston.

In an interview, Dr. Sullivan said that the finding about lower frequency of reconstructive procedures in the narrow margins groups may be more of a concern for younger patients than for the elderly.

Study design

The investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 18 or older at the National Cancer Institute of Milan who were diagnosed with T1a cutaneous melanoma close to critical areas from 2001 through 2020.

Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and face areas with functional or cosmetic considerations, acral areas (plantar, palmar, digital and interdigital areas), external genitalia, or periumbilical and perineal areas were eligible for inclusion.

The cohort comprised 1,179 patients with a median age of 50 and equal sex distribution. Of these patients, 626 (53%) had a wide excision, of whom 434 had a linear repair, and 192 had a flap of graft reconstruction. The remaining 553 patients had narrow excisions, 491 with linear repair, and 62 with flap or graft reconstruction.

Analyses were adjusted to account for imbalances between the surgical groups.

The study was supported by the nonprofit foundation Emme Rouge. The authors and Dr. Sullivan reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Current U.S., European, and Australian guidelines recommend 10-mm safety margins for radical excision of primary melanomas, but for patients with early-stage cutaneous melanoma in critical areas of the body, excision with 5-mm margins may not significantly increase risk for recurrence or melanoma-specific mortality (MSM), results of a retrospective study suggest.

Among 1,179 patients with stage T1a melanomas near the face, scalp, external genitalia, or other critical areas, the weighted 10-year local recurrence rate for patients who underwent resection with 10-mm margins was 5.7%, compared with 6.7% for those who had resections with 5-mm margins, a nonsignificant difference.

Weighted 10-year melanoma-specific mortality was 1.8% for patients treated with wide margins, vs. 4.2% for those treated with narrow margins, also a nonsignificant difference. Patients treated with narrow margins did have significantly fewer reconstructive surgeries than patients treated with wide margins, reported Andrea Maurichi, MD, and colleagues at the National Cancer Institute of Italy in Milan.

“Because this association was found in melanomas of the head and neck, acral, and genital sites, there is no plausible reason why it could not be extrapolated to other locations. The findings also support the need for prospective randomized clinical trials to definitively answer the important question about appropriate excision margins for T1a melanoma,” they wrote in the study, published online in JAMA Dermatology.

The authors also found, however, that Breslow thickness greater than 0.4 mm and mitotic rate greater than 1/mm­­² were associated with worse MSM, and that acral lentiginous melanoma, lentigo maligna melanoma, and increasing Breslow thickness were associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence.

A melanoma expert who was not involved in the study said that despite these findings, wider margins are always preferable.

“There is always a conversation around these general [critical] areas, but as a rule we try to get larger margins,” said Ryan J. Sullivan, MD, of Mass General Cancer Center in Boston.

In an interview, Dr. Sullivan said that the finding about lower frequency of reconstructive procedures in the narrow margins groups may be more of a concern for younger patients than for the elderly.

Study design

The investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 18 or older at the National Cancer Institute of Milan who were diagnosed with T1a cutaneous melanoma close to critical areas from 2001 through 2020.

Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and face areas with functional or cosmetic considerations, acral areas (plantar, palmar, digital and interdigital areas), external genitalia, or periumbilical and perineal areas were eligible for inclusion.

The cohort comprised 1,179 patients with a median age of 50 and equal sex distribution. Of these patients, 626 (53%) had a wide excision, of whom 434 had a linear repair, and 192 had a flap of graft reconstruction. The remaining 553 patients had narrow excisions, 491 with linear repair, and 62 with flap or graft reconstruction.

Analyses were adjusted to account for imbalances between the surgical groups.

The study was supported by the nonprofit foundation Emme Rouge. The authors and Dr. Sullivan reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Over the past 30 years, more than 80 new systemic therapies for cancer have been approved, and many patients diagnosed with localized disease have benefited with improved progression-free and overall survival. The same can be said for some – but by no means all – patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, a new study indicates.

“Our results show that the survival of patients with de novo metastatic cancer improved slowly over 30 years but that these gains were typically modest and unevenly distributed among cancers,” comment the authors, led by Marianne Luyendijk, MSc, from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht.

The study was published online  in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The retrospective study compared survival data of patients with de novo metastatic disease diagnosed from 1989 through 1993 with those of patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2018.

The results show that 5-year survival increased by 15% or more among patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors; neuroendocrine tumors; melanoma; and cancers of the prostate, breast, thyroid, and testes.

For patients with other cancers, however, the gains in survival were more modest. For example, over the study period, 5-year survival of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer increased by only 6%, a disappointing finding, given the advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapy during the most recent period, the authors note.

In contrast, there was a 16% improvement in long-term survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, likely owing to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The data also showed differences over time in the proportion of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease; some cancers, such as NSCLC and small cell lung cancer, were more frequently diagnosed at late stages in the more recent era, possibly owing to increased screening and the use of technology such as FDG-PET imaging.

On the other end of the spectrum, cancers of the prostate, rectum, uterine cervix, breast, gallbladder, and bile ducts were more likely to be caught at an earlier stage during later years of the study period.

The authors say that among the possible explanations for a less than robust reduction over time in metastatic disease is that new drugs do not always translate into improved survival. They cite a 2017 study showing that among 53 new cancer drugs approved by U.S., European, or Australian drug regulators, fewer than half improved overall survival by at least 3 months, and an additional 26% offered survival advantages that were either shorter than 3 months or of unknown benefit.

“This may also explain why the 1- and 5-year survival rates of some cancers have changed little in the last 30 years,” they write. “Nevertheless, even minor benefits in survival or other outcomes (for example, quality of life) may represent progress in treating patients with metastatic cancer.”

The investigators recommend that to improve understanding of the effect of new therapies on survival of metastatic disease, cancer registries include data on therapies used beyond the first line, as well as comorbidities and quality-of-life measures.

The authors did not report a study funding source. Ms. Luyendijk has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Several co-authors reported financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Over the past 30 years, more than 80 new systemic therapies for cancer have been approved, and many patients diagnosed with localized disease have benefited with improved progression-free and overall survival. The same can be said for some – but by no means all – patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, a new study indicates.

“Our results show that the survival of patients with de novo metastatic cancer improved slowly over 30 years but that these gains were typically modest and unevenly distributed among cancers,” comment the authors, led by Marianne Luyendijk, MSc, from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht.

The study was published online  in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The retrospective study compared survival data of patients with de novo metastatic disease diagnosed from 1989 through 1993 with those of patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2018.

The results show that 5-year survival increased by 15% or more among patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors; neuroendocrine tumors; melanoma; and cancers of the prostate, breast, thyroid, and testes.

For patients with other cancers, however, the gains in survival were more modest. For example, over the study period, 5-year survival of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer increased by only 6%, a disappointing finding, given the advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapy during the most recent period, the authors note.

In contrast, there was a 16% improvement in long-term survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, likely owing to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The data also showed differences over time in the proportion of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease; some cancers, such as NSCLC and small cell lung cancer, were more frequently diagnosed at late stages in the more recent era, possibly owing to increased screening and the use of technology such as FDG-PET imaging.

On the other end of the spectrum, cancers of the prostate, rectum, uterine cervix, breast, gallbladder, and bile ducts were more likely to be caught at an earlier stage during later years of the study period.

The authors say that among the possible explanations for a less than robust reduction over time in metastatic disease is that new drugs do not always translate into improved survival. They cite a 2017 study showing that among 53 new cancer drugs approved by U.S., European, or Australian drug regulators, fewer than half improved overall survival by at least 3 months, and an additional 26% offered survival advantages that were either shorter than 3 months or of unknown benefit.

“This may also explain why the 1- and 5-year survival rates of some cancers have changed little in the last 30 years,” they write. “Nevertheless, even minor benefits in survival or other outcomes (for example, quality of life) may represent progress in treating patients with metastatic cancer.”

The investigators recommend that to improve understanding of the effect of new therapies on survival of metastatic disease, cancer registries include data on therapies used beyond the first line, as well as comorbidities and quality-of-life measures.

The authors did not report a study funding source. Ms. Luyendijk has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Several co-authors reported financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Over the past 30 years, more than 80 new systemic therapies for cancer have been approved, and many patients diagnosed with localized disease have benefited with improved progression-free and overall survival. The same can be said for some – but by no means all – patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, a new study indicates.

“Our results show that the survival of patients with de novo metastatic cancer improved slowly over 30 years but that these gains were typically modest and unevenly distributed among cancers,” comment the authors, led by Marianne Luyendijk, MSc, from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht.

The study was published online  in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The retrospective study compared survival data of patients with de novo metastatic disease diagnosed from 1989 through 1993 with those of patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2018.

The results show that 5-year survival increased by 15% or more among patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors; neuroendocrine tumors; melanoma; and cancers of the prostate, breast, thyroid, and testes.

For patients with other cancers, however, the gains in survival were more modest. For example, over the study period, 5-year survival of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer increased by only 6%, a disappointing finding, given the advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapy during the most recent period, the authors note.

In contrast, there was a 16% improvement in long-term survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, likely owing to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The data also showed differences over time in the proportion of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease; some cancers, such as NSCLC and small cell lung cancer, were more frequently diagnosed at late stages in the more recent era, possibly owing to increased screening and the use of technology such as FDG-PET imaging.

On the other end of the spectrum, cancers of the prostate, rectum, uterine cervix, breast, gallbladder, and bile ducts were more likely to be caught at an earlier stage during later years of the study period.

The authors say that among the possible explanations for a less than robust reduction over time in metastatic disease is that new drugs do not always translate into improved survival. They cite a 2017 study showing that among 53 new cancer drugs approved by U.S., European, or Australian drug regulators, fewer than half improved overall survival by at least 3 months, and an additional 26% offered survival advantages that were either shorter than 3 months or of unknown benefit.

“This may also explain why the 1- and 5-year survival rates of some cancers have changed little in the last 30 years,” they write. “Nevertheless, even minor benefits in survival or other outcomes (for example, quality of life) may represent progress in treating patients with metastatic cancer.”

The investigators recommend that to improve understanding of the effect of new therapies on survival of metastatic disease, cancer registries include data on therapies used beyond the first line, as well as comorbidities and quality-of-life measures.

The authors did not report a study funding source. Ms. Luyendijk has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Several co-authors reported financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

It’s estimated that half of all people in the world are infected with Helicobacter pylori, a bacterium associated with increased risk for gastric ulcers and gastric cancer.

However, only a small percentage of people with H. pylori infection will go on to develop gastric cancer.

Now a team from Japan reports that specific mutations in genes associated with DNA repair, when combined with the common bacterial infection H. pylori, appear to significantly increase the risk for gastric cancer.

The new findings imply that the hereditary contribution to the risk of gastric cancer is more important than previously believed, say editorialists commenting on the study.

The article and accompanying editorial were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

For this study, Yoshiaki Usui, MD, PhD, of the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Japan, and colleagues analyzed samples from 10,426 patients with gastric cancer as well as 38,153 control samples from a Japanese biobank.

First, they looked at the association between gastric cancer and germline pathogenic variants in 27 genes known to predispose carriers to cancers.

They also looked at the combined effects of pathogenic variants and H. pylori infection and calculated the cumulative risk among 1,433 patients with gastric cancer and 5,997 control samples from a cancer-center research database.

They found that germline pathogenic variants in nine genes were associated with the risk for gastric cancer. The genes were APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PALB2.

The pathogenic germline (inherited) variants in these nine genes were associated with homologous recombination, which involves an exchange of nucleotide sequences between two similar or identical DNA molecules that occurs during meiosis and during repair of double-strand DNA breaks.

The investigators calculated that the cumulative risk for gastric cancer at age 85 among carriers of the variants who were infected with H. pylori was 45.5%, compared with 14.4% for control persons who were infected but were not carriers of the germline pathogenic variants.

The risk for gastric cancer was less than 5% among those without H. pylori infections, regardless of their carrier status.

“Our results suggest that in persons known to carry a pathogenic variant in a homologous-recombination gene, evaluation and eradication of H. pylori infection may be particularly important,” Dr. Usui and colleagues wrote.

“It is remarkable that pathogenic variants in homologous-recombination genes drive tumorigenesis only in the context of H. pylori infection,” Anne Müller, PhD, and Jiazhuo He, MD, of the University of Zürich, wrote in the accompanying editorial.

“This observation has numerous implications, not only for the diagnosis, prevention, and possibly treatment of the fraction of cases of gastric cancer with pathogenic gene variants that arise due to H. pylori infection but also for a better understanding of the biology of other cancers arising on a background of homologous-recombination deficiency. It is quite conceivable that other DNA-damaging environmental factors contributing to human carcinogenesis have been overlooked.” they wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture, and Technology of Japan; the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan; and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Dr. Usui, Dr. Müller, and Dr. He have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

It’s estimated that half of all people in the world are infected with Helicobacter pylori, a bacterium associated with increased risk for gastric ulcers and gastric cancer.

However, only a small percentage of people with H. pylori infection will go on to develop gastric cancer.

Now a team from Japan reports that specific mutations in genes associated with DNA repair, when combined with the common bacterial infection H. pylori, appear to significantly increase the risk for gastric cancer.

The new findings imply that the hereditary contribution to the risk of gastric cancer is more important than previously believed, say editorialists commenting on the study.

The article and accompanying editorial were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

For this study, Yoshiaki Usui, MD, PhD, of the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Japan, and colleagues analyzed samples from 10,426 patients with gastric cancer as well as 38,153 control samples from a Japanese biobank.

First, they looked at the association between gastric cancer and germline pathogenic variants in 27 genes known to predispose carriers to cancers.

They also looked at the combined effects of pathogenic variants and H. pylori infection and calculated the cumulative risk among 1,433 patients with gastric cancer and 5,997 control samples from a cancer-center research database.

They found that germline pathogenic variants in nine genes were associated with the risk for gastric cancer. The genes were APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PALB2.

The pathogenic germline (inherited) variants in these nine genes were associated with homologous recombination, which involves an exchange of nucleotide sequences between two similar or identical DNA molecules that occurs during meiosis and during repair of double-strand DNA breaks.

The investigators calculated that the cumulative risk for gastric cancer at age 85 among carriers of the variants who were infected with H. pylori was 45.5%, compared with 14.4% for control persons who were infected but were not carriers of the germline pathogenic variants.

The risk for gastric cancer was less than 5% among those without H. pylori infections, regardless of their carrier status.

“Our results suggest that in persons known to carry a pathogenic variant in a homologous-recombination gene, evaluation and eradication of H. pylori infection may be particularly important,” Dr. Usui and colleagues wrote.

“It is remarkable that pathogenic variants in homologous-recombination genes drive tumorigenesis only in the context of H. pylori infection,” Anne Müller, PhD, and Jiazhuo He, MD, of the University of Zürich, wrote in the accompanying editorial.

“This observation has numerous implications, not only for the diagnosis, prevention, and possibly treatment of the fraction of cases of gastric cancer with pathogenic gene variants that arise due to H. pylori infection but also for a better understanding of the biology of other cancers arising on a background of homologous-recombination deficiency. It is quite conceivable that other DNA-damaging environmental factors contributing to human carcinogenesis have been overlooked.” they wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture, and Technology of Japan; the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan; and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Dr. Usui, Dr. Müller, and Dr. He have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

It’s estimated that half of all people in the world are infected with Helicobacter pylori, a bacterium associated with increased risk for gastric ulcers and gastric cancer.

However, only a small percentage of people with H. pylori infection will go on to develop gastric cancer.

Now a team from Japan reports that specific mutations in genes associated with DNA repair, when combined with the common bacterial infection H. pylori, appear to significantly increase the risk for gastric cancer.

The new findings imply that the hereditary contribution to the risk of gastric cancer is more important than previously believed, say editorialists commenting on the study.

The article and accompanying editorial were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

For this study, Yoshiaki Usui, MD, PhD, of the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Japan, and colleagues analyzed samples from 10,426 patients with gastric cancer as well as 38,153 control samples from a Japanese biobank.

First, they looked at the association between gastric cancer and germline pathogenic variants in 27 genes known to predispose carriers to cancers.

They also looked at the combined effects of pathogenic variants and H. pylori infection and calculated the cumulative risk among 1,433 patients with gastric cancer and 5,997 control samples from a cancer-center research database.

They found that germline pathogenic variants in nine genes were associated with the risk for gastric cancer. The genes were APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PALB2.

The pathogenic germline (inherited) variants in these nine genes were associated with homologous recombination, which involves an exchange of nucleotide sequences between two similar or identical DNA molecules that occurs during meiosis and during repair of double-strand DNA breaks.

The investigators calculated that the cumulative risk for gastric cancer at age 85 among carriers of the variants who were infected with H. pylori was 45.5%, compared with 14.4% for control persons who were infected but were not carriers of the germline pathogenic variants.

The risk for gastric cancer was less than 5% among those without H. pylori infections, regardless of their carrier status.

“Our results suggest that in persons known to carry a pathogenic variant in a homologous-recombination gene, evaluation and eradication of H. pylori infection may be particularly important,” Dr. Usui and colleagues wrote.

“It is remarkable that pathogenic variants in homologous-recombination genes drive tumorigenesis only in the context of H. pylori infection,” Anne Müller, PhD, and Jiazhuo He, MD, of the University of Zürich, wrote in the accompanying editorial.

“This observation has numerous implications, not only for the diagnosis, prevention, and possibly treatment of the fraction of cases of gastric cancer with pathogenic gene variants that arise due to H. pylori infection but also for a better understanding of the biology of other cancers arising on a background of homologous-recombination deficiency. It is quite conceivable that other DNA-damaging environmental factors contributing to human carcinogenesis have been overlooked.” they wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture, and Technology of Japan; the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan; and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Dr. Usui, Dr. Müller, and Dr. He have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is neither helpful nor useful as a solitary prostate cancer screening tool in middle-aged men, say investigators reporting the PROBASE study.

The study compared risk-adapted screening measures in men who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured at age 45 with those who had PSA measurements plus DRE at age 50.

The results show that as a solitary screening tool, 99% of DREs did not raise suspicion for prostate cancer, and among the 57 cases where DRE did raise suspicion, only three men were found to have cancer, all of which were low-grade, reported Agne Krilaviciute, PhD, from the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, and colleagues.

“We also see that the cancer detection rate by PSA is four times higher compared to the DRE detection. Around 18% of the tumors are located in the part of the prostate where DRE cannot detect them,” she said in an oral presentation at the European Association of Urology Congress.

The investigators found that the majority of prostate cancers that occurred in this relatively young population were International Society of Urological Pathology grade 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) or grade 2 (Gleason 3 + 4 = 7). DRE yields positive results in only about 12% of cases of ISUP grade 1 or 2, they noted.

“We conclude that DRE as a solitary screening test does not lead to a significant PCa [prostate cancer] detection rate in young men,” Dr. Krilaviciute said.
 

Falling by the wayside

The study adds to the growing body of evidence that DRE may not be especially helpful as either a screening tool or when used in active surveillance of men with prostate cancer.

An international consensus panel found that DRE could be safely skipped for active surveillance when MRI and other more accurate and objective measures, such as biomarkers, are available.

A prostate cancer expert who was not involved in the PROBASE study told this news organization that when he was in medical school, it would have been considered a serious lapse of practice not to perform a DRE, but that things have changed considerably over the past several years.

“We have PSA now, we have technology with MRI, and the yield of digital rectal examination is very low,” commented Julio Pow-Sang, MD, chief of the genitourinary oncology program at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Empirically, it’s very rare to find positive cancer through rectal exam in this day and age of PSA,” he said, adding that the examination itself is highly subjective, with varying results depending on the skills of the particular examiner.

“I think that in time, with good studies like this, digital rectal exam specifically for prostate cancer is going to slowly fade away,” Dr. Pow-Sang said.
 

PROBASE results

PROBASE was a randomized screening study enrolling men at age 45 to test a risk-adapted screening strategy using a baseline PSA value with the additional offer of DRE in a large subcohort of participants.

The study was conducted in Germany, and the authors note that the “German statutory early detection program recommends DRE as a stand-alone screening test starting annually at age 45.”

The PROBASE investigators enrolled 46,495 men from February 2014 through December 2019.

Among the first 23,194 men enrolled, 6,537 underwent DRE at enrollment without a study PSA test.

In this group, 6,480 DREs (99%) were not suspicious for cancer, and 57 (1%) were. Of those with suspected prostate cancer, 37 underwent biopsy and 20 did not. Of those biopsied, only two were found to have prostate cancer. This translated into a cancer detection rate of 0.03% for DRE.

After a median of 6.6 years of follow-up, only one additional case of ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer was detected among the 6,357 men who had DREs at enrollment, translating into a prostate cancer detection rate of .05%.

The investigators also looked at men who suspicious DRE findings at baseline. They assumed that a DRE-detectable tumor at age 45 would still be manifest 5 years later and should be detectable with PSA at age 50. Of the 57 men with initially suspicious findings, 11 returned for PSA screening but refused biopsy, and of this group only one had an elevated PSA level. He then underwent biopsy, but the findings were negative.

Of those who underwent biopsy on the basis of DRE, 16 had prostatitis, 14 had benign prostatic hyperplasia, 1 had high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 1 had atypical small acinar proliferation, and 3 had equivocal findings.

In total, the investigators found 24 tumors among men screened with DRE. Of these, 3 occurred in men with results deemed suspicious and 21 were in men with unsuspicious digital exams. All of the tumors were ISUP grade 1, 2, or 3 tumors.

Among 245 men who had biopsies for a PSA level equal to or higher than 3 ng/mL, primarily Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 tumors, DRE findings at the time of biopsy were unsuspicious in about 82% of cases, Dr. Krilaviciute said.

“We also used MRI data to determine what proportion of tumors would be potentially detectable by DRE. We estimated that around 18% of tumors are located in the upper part of the prostate, which is not detectable by DRE,” she said. “Even excluding those tumors, still the DRE detection rate is low in palpable tumors.”

Although DRE performed better in higher-grade tumors, 80% of the tumors in the PROBASE participants were ISUP grade 1 or 2 and were likely to be undetected by DRE, she added.

“In Germany, the recommendations for the screening still include 45-year-olds to go with annual DRE. The PROBASE trial allowed us to evaluate for the first time what was the diagnostic performance for DRE at such a young age, and we see that 99% of men undergoing DRE have no suspicious findings, and among the 1% of suspicious findings having cancers extremely unlikely,” she said.

The study was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid). Dr. Krilaviciute and Dr. Pow-Sang reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is neither helpful nor useful as a solitary prostate cancer screening tool in middle-aged men, say investigators reporting the PROBASE study.

The study compared risk-adapted screening measures in men who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured at age 45 with those who had PSA measurements plus DRE at age 50.

The results show that as a solitary screening tool, 99% of DREs did not raise suspicion for prostate cancer, and among the 57 cases where DRE did raise suspicion, only three men were found to have cancer, all of which were low-grade, reported Agne Krilaviciute, PhD, from the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, and colleagues.

“We also see that the cancer detection rate by PSA is four times higher compared to the DRE detection. Around 18% of the tumors are located in the part of the prostate where DRE cannot detect them,” she said in an oral presentation at the European Association of Urology Congress.

The investigators found that the majority of prostate cancers that occurred in this relatively young population were International Society of Urological Pathology grade 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) or grade 2 (Gleason 3 + 4 = 7). DRE yields positive results in only about 12% of cases of ISUP grade 1 or 2, they noted.

“We conclude that DRE as a solitary screening test does not lead to a significant PCa [prostate cancer] detection rate in young men,” Dr. Krilaviciute said.
 

Falling by the wayside

The study adds to the growing body of evidence that DRE may not be especially helpful as either a screening tool or when used in active surveillance of men with prostate cancer.

An international consensus panel found that DRE could be safely skipped for active surveillance when MRI and other more accurate and objective measures, such as biomarkers, are available.

A prostate cancer expert who was not involved in the PROBASE study told this news organization that when he was in medical school, it would have been considered a serious lapse of practice not to perform a DRE, but that things have changed considerably over the past several years.

“We have PSA now, we have technology with MRI, and the yield of digital rectal examination is very low,” commented Julio Pow-Sang, MD, chief of the genitourinary oncology program at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Empirically, it’s very rare to find positive cancer through rectal exam in this day and age of PSA,” he said, adding that the examination itself is highly subjective, with varying results depending on the skills of the particular examiner.

“I think that in time, with good studies like this, digital rectal exam specifically for prostate cancer is going to slowly fade away,” Dr. Pow-Sang said.
 

PROBASE results

PROBASE was a randomized screening study enrolling men at age 45 to test a risk-adapted screening strategy using a baseline PSA value with the additional offer of DRE in a large subcohort of participants.

The study was conducted in Germany, and the authors note that the “German statutory early detection program recommends DRE as a stand-alone screening test starting annually at age 45.”

The PROBASE investigators enrolled 46,495 men from February 2014 through December 2019.

Among the first 23,194 men enrolled, 6,537 underwent DRE at enrollment without a study PSA test.

In this group, 6,480 DREs (99%) were not suspicious for cancer, and 57 (1%) were. Of those with suspected prostate cancer, 37 underwent biopsy and 20 did not. Of those biopsied, only two were found to have prostate cancer. This translated into a cancer detection rate of 0.03% for DRE.

After a median of 6.6 years of follow-up, only one additional case of ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer was detected among the 6,357 men who had DREs at enrollment, translating into a prostate cancer detection rate of .05%.

The investigators also looked at men who suspicious DRE findings at baseline. They assumed that a DRE-detectable tumor at age 45 would still be manifest 5 years later and should be detectable with PSA at age 50. Of the 57 men with initially suspicious findings, 11 returned for PSA screening but refused biopsy, and of this group only one had an elevated PSA level. He then underwent biopsy, but the findings were negative.

Of those who underwent biopsy on the basis of DRE, 16 had prostatitis, 14 had benign prostatic hyperplasia, 1 had high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 1 had atypical small acinar proliferation, and 3 had equivocal findings.

In total, the investigators found 24 tumors among men screened with DRE. Of these, 3 occurred in men with results deemed suspicious and 21 were in men with unsuspicious digital exams. All of the tumors were ISUP grade 1, 2, or 3 tumors.

Among 245 men who had biopsies for a PSA level equal to or higher than 3 ng/mL, primarily Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 tumors, DRE findings at the time of biopsy were unsuspicious in about 82% of cases, Dr. Krilaviciute said.

“We also used MRI data to determine what proportion of tumors would be potentially detectable by DRE. We estimated that around 18% of tumors are located in the upper part of the prostate, which is not detectable by DRE,” she said. “Even excluding those tumors, still the DRE detection rate is low in palpable tumors.”

Although DRE performed better in higher-grade tumors, 80% of the tumors in the PROBASE participants were ISUP grade 1 or 2 and were likely to be undetected by DRE, she added.

“In Germany, the recommendations for the screening still include 45-year-olds to go with annual DRE. The PROBASE trial allowed us to evaluate for the first time what was the diagnostic performance for DRE at such a young age, and we see that 99% of men undergoing DRE have no suspicious findings, and among the 1% of suspicious findings having cancers extremely unlikely,” she said.

The study was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid). Dr. Krilaviciute and Dr. Pow-Sang reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is neither helpful nor useful as a solitary prostate cancer screening tool in middle-aged men, say investigators reporting the PROBASE study.

The study compared risk-adapted screening measures in men who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured at age 45 with those who had PSA measurements plus DRE at age 50.

The results show that as a solitary screening tool, 99% of DREs did not raise suspicion for prostate cancer, and among the 57 cases where DRE did raise suspicion, only three men were found to have cancer, all of which were low-grade, reported Agne Krilaviciute, PhD, from the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, and colleagues.

“We also see that the cancer detection rate by PSA is four times higher compared to the DRE detection. Around 18% of the tumors are located in the part of the prostate where DRE cannot detect them,” she said in an oral presentation at the European Association of Urology Congress.

The investigators found that the majority of prostate cancers that occurred in this relatively young population were International Society of Urological Pathology grade 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) or grade 2 (Gleason 3 + 4 = 7). DRE yields positive results in only about 12% of cases of ISUP grade 1 or 2, they noted.

“We conclude that DRE as a solitary screening test does not lead to a significant PCa [prostate cancer] detection rate in young men,” Dr. Krilaviciute said.
 

Falling by the wayside

The study adds to the growing body of evidence that DRE may not be especially helpful as either a screening tool or when used in active surveillance of men with prostate cancer.

An international consensus panel found that DRE could be safely skipped for active surveillance when MRI and other more accurate and objective measures, such as biomarkers, are available.

A prostate cancer expert who was not involved in the PROBASE study told this news organization that when he was in medical school, it would have been considered a serious lapse of practice not to perform a DRE, but that things have changed considerably over the past several years.

“We have PSA now, we have technology with MRI, and the yield of digital rectal examination is very low,” commented Julio Pow-Sang, MD, chief of the genitourinary oncology program at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Empirically, it’s very rare to find positive cancer through rectal exam in this day and age of PSA,” he said, adding that the examination itself is highly subjective, with varying results depending on the skills of the particular examiner.

“I think that in time, with good studies like this, digital rectal exam specifically for prostate cancer is going to slowly fade away,” Dr. Pow-Sang said.
 

PROBASE results

PROBASE was a randomized screening study enrolling men at age 45 to test a risk-adapted screening strategy using a baseline PSA value with the additional offer of DRE in a large subcohort of participants.

The study was conducted in Germany, and the authors note that the “German statutory early detection program recommends DRE as a stand-alone screening test starting annually at age 45.”

The PROBASE investigators enrolled 46,495 men from February 2014 through December 2019.

Among the first 23,194 men enrolled, 6,537 underwent DRE at enrollment without a study PSA test.

In this group, 6,480 DREs (99%) were not suspicious for cancer, and 57 (1%) were. Of those with suspected prostate cancer, 37 underwent biopsy and 20 did not. Of those biopsied, only two were found to have prostate cancer. This translated into a cancer detection rate of 0.03% for DRE.

After a median of 6.6 years of follow-up, only one additional case of ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer was detected among the 6,357 men who had DREs at enrollment, translating into a prostate cancer detection rate of .05%.

The investigators also looked at men who suspicious DRE findings at baseline. They assumed that a DRE-detectable tumor at age 45 would still be manifest 5 years later and should be detectable with PSA at age 50. Of the 57 men with initially suspicious findings, 11 returned for PSA screening but refused biopsy, and of this group only one had an elevated PSA level. He then underwent biopsy, but the findings were negative.

Of those who underwent biopsy on the basis of DRE, 16 had prostatitis, 14 had benign prostatic hyperplasia, 1 had high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 1 had atypical small acinar proliferation, and 3 had equivocal findings.

In total, the investigators found 24 tumors among men screened with DRE. Of these, 3 occurred in men with results deemed suspicious and 21 were in men with unsuspicious digital exams. All of the tumors were ISUP grade 1, 2, or 3 tumors.

Among 245 men who had biopsies for a PSA level equal to or higher than 3 ng/mL, primarily Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 tumors, DRE findings at the time of biopsy were unsuspicious in about 82% of cases, Dr. Krilaviciute said.

“We also used MRI data to determine what proportion of tumors would be potentially detectable by DRE. We estimated that around 18% of tumors are located in the upper part of the prostate, which is not detectable by DRE,” she said. “Even excluding those tumors, still the DRE detection rate is low in palpable tumors.”

Although DRE performed better in higher-grade tumors, 80% of the tumors in the PROBASE participants were ISUP grade 1 or 2 and were likely to be undetected by DRE, she added.

“In Germany, the recommendations for the screening still include 45-year-olds to go with annual DRE. The PROBASE trial allowed us to evaluate for the first time what was the diagnostic performance for DRE at such a young age, and we see that 99% of men undergoing DRE have no suspicious findings, and among the 1% of suspicious findings having cancers extremely unlikely,” she said.

The study was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid). Dr. Krilaviciute and Dr. Pow-Sang reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A simple urine test for genetic mutations in urine-derived DNA can predict urothelial cancer up to 12 years before patients develop symptoms, an international team of researchers claims.

The test, if validated in further studies, has the potential to serve as a cancer screening tool for individuals at elevated risk for bladder cancer due to genetics, smoking, or from environmental exposures to known carcinogens, and it could help to reduce the frequency of unnecessary cystoscopies, say urologists who were not involved in the research.

The test involved was performed using a next-generation sequencing assay (UroAmp, Convergent Genomics, based in San Francisco) that identifies mutations in 60 genes associated with bladder cancer. New research reported at the annual congress of the European Association of Urology described the screening model that focused on 10 key genes covered in the assay.

In training and validation cohorts, the urinary comprehensive genomic profiling test accurately predicted future bladder cancer in 66% of patient urine samples, including some that had been collected more than a decade prior to being tested, reported Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, PhD, MSc, from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

“Our results provide first evidence from a population-based cohort study of preclinical urothelial cancer detection with urinary comprehensive genomic profiling,” she told the meeting.

The results were consistent both in individuals with known risk factors for bladder cancer who were undergoing cystoscopy and in those with no evidence of disease, she said.

“Research of this nature is very encouraging, as it shows that our ability to identify molecular alterations in liquid biopsies such as urine that might indicate cancer is constantly improving,” commented Joost Boormans, MD, PhD, a urologist at the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, and a member of the EAU Scientific Congress Office.

“While we do need to develop more accurate diagnostics, it’s unlikely that we’ll have a mass screening program for bladder cancer in the near future,” he continued. “Where a urine test for genetic mutations could show its value is in reducing cystoscopies and scans in bladder cancer patients who are being monitored for recurrence, as well as those referred for blood in their urine. A simple urine test would be far easier for patients to undergo than invasive procedures or scans, as well as being less costly for health services.”

Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm and colleagues had previously shown that promoter mutations in the gene encoding for the enzyme telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) identified in urine were “promising noninvasive biomarkers” for early detection of bladder cancer.

They found that TERT mutations in urine could predict which patients were likely to develop urothelial cancer with 48% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

In the study presented at EAU23, they hypothesized that uCGP of DNA in urine could offer enhanced sensitivity for early detection of urothelial cancer.

They first used the 60-gene assay to create a training set using urine samples from 46 patients with de novo urothelial cancer, 40 with recurrent cancer, and 140 healthy controls.

They then tested the model in two validation cohorts. The first validation cohort consisted of samples from 22 patients with de novo cancer, 48 with recurrent urothelial cancer, and 96 controls from a case-control study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Ohio State University, Columbus.

The second validation cohort included 29 patients from the prospective Golestan Cohort Study who subsequently developed urothelial cancer, with 98 controls.

In all, 10 genes were identified as optimal for inclusion in a screening model, which was trained to an overall sensitivity of 88% and a 97% sensitivity for high-grade tumors, with a specificity of 94%.

In the MGH/OSU validation cohort the sensitivity of the models was 71%, and the specificity was 94%. In the Golestan cohort, the sensitivity was 66%, with a specificity of 94%. This compared favorably with the performance of the TERT-only screening model, which, as noted before, had a sensitivity of 48%, albeit with 100% specificity.

“Interestingly, when we broke down the analysis according to the lag time between urine collection and diagnosis, sensitivity increased as the time to diagnosis decreased, so the closer we got to the diagnosis, the higher was the sensitivity,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm said.

When the analysis was limited to urothelial cancers diagnosed within 7 years of sample collection, the sensitivity for detecting preclinical cancer improved to 86%, compared with 57% for a test of TERT promoter mutations alone. 

Among the patients in the Golestan cohort, uCGP-predicted positive results were associated with a more than eightfold higher risk for worse cancer-free survival, compared with uCGP-predicted negatives (hazard ratio 8.5, P < .0001).

“Of course, further studies are needed to validate this finding and to assess the clinical utility in other longitudinal cohorts,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm concluded.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A simple urine test for genetic mutations in urine-derived DNA can predict urothelial cancer up to 12 years before patients develop symptoms, an international team of researchers claims.

The test, if validated in further studies, has the potential to serve as a cancer screening tool for individuals at elevated risk for bladder cancer due to genetics, smoking, or from environmental exposures to known carcinogens, and it could help to reduce the frequency of unnecessary cystoscopies, say urologists who were not involved in the research.

The test involved was performed using a next-generation sequencing assay (UroAmp, Convergent Genomics, based in San Francisco) that identifies mutations in 60 genes associated with bladder cancer. New research reported at the annual congress of the European Association of Urology described the screening model that focused on 10 key genes covered in the assay.

In training and validation cohorts, the urinary comprehensive genomic profiling test accurately predicted future bladder cancer in 66% of patient urine samples, including some that had been collected more than a decade prior to being tested, reported Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, PhD, MSc, from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

“Our results provide first evidence from a population-based cohort study of preclinical urothelial cancer detection with urinary comprehensive genomic profiling,” she told the meeting.

The results were consistent both in individuals with known risk factors for bladder cancer who were undergoing cystoscopy and in those with no evidence of disease, she said.

“Research of this nature is very encouraging, as it shows that our ability to identify molecular alterations in liquid biopsies such as urine that might indicate cancer is constantly improving,” commented Joost Boormans, MD, PhD, a urologist at the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, and a member of the EAU Scientific Congress Office.

“While we do need to develop more accurate diagnostics, it’s unlikely that we’ll have a mass screening program for bladder cancer in the near future,” he continued. “Where a urine test for genetic mutations could show its value is in reducing cystoscopies and scans in bladder cancer patients who are being monitored for recurrence, as well as those referred for blood in their urine. A simple urine test would be far easier for patients to undergo than invasive procedures or scans, as well as being less costly for health services.”

Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm and colleagues had previously shown that promoter mutations in the gene encoding for the enzyme telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) identified in urine were “promising noninvasive biomarkers” for early detection of bladder cancer.

They found that TERT mutations in urine could predict which patients were likely to develop urothelial cancer with 48% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

In the study presented at EAU23, they hypothesized that uCGP of DNA in urine could offer enhanced sensitivity for early detection of urothelial cancer.

They first used the 60-gene assay to create a training set using urine samples from 46 patients with de novo urothelial cancer, 40 with recurrent cancer, and 140 healthy controls.

They then tested the model in two validation cohorts. The first validation cohort consisted of samples from 22 patients with de novo cancer, 48 with recurrent urothelial cancer, and 96 controls from a case-control study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Ohio State University, Columbus.

The second validation cohort included 29 patients from the prospective Golestan Cohort Study who subsequently developed urothelial cancer, with 98 controls.

In all, 10 genes were identified as optimal for inclusion in a screening model, which was trained to an overall sensitivity of 88% and a 97% sensitivity for high-grade tumors, with a specificity of 94%.

In the MGH/OSU validation cohort the sensitivity of the models was 71%, and the specificity was 94%. In the Golestan cohort, the sensitivity was 66%, with a specificity of 94%. This compared favorably with the performance of the TERT-only screening model, which, as noted before, had a sensitivity of 48%, albeit with 100% specificity.

“Interestingly, when we broke down the analysis according to the lag time between urine collection and diagnosis, sensitivity increased as the time to diagnosis decreased, so the closer we got to the diagnosis, the higher was the sensitivity,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm said.

When the analysis was limited to urothelial cancers diagnosed within 7 years of sample collection, the sensitivity for detecting preclinical cancer improved to 86%, compared with 57% for a test of TERT promoter mutations alone. 

Among the patients in the Golestan cohort, uCGP-predicted positive results were associated with a more than eightfold higher risk for worse cancer-free survival, compared with uCGP-predicted negatives (hazard ratio 8.5, P < .0001).

“Of course, further studies are needed to validate this finding and to assess the clinical utility in other longitudinal cohorts,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm concluded.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A simple urine test for genetic mutations in urine-derived DNA can predict urothelial cancer up to 12 years before patients develop symptoms, an international team of researchers claims.

The test, if validated in further studies, has the potential to serve as a cancer screening tool for individuals at elevated risk for bladder cancer due to genetics, smoking, or from environmental exposures to known carcinogens, and it could help to reduce the frequency of unnecessary cystoscopies, say urologists who were not involved in the research.

The test involved was performed using a next-generation sequencing assay (UroAmp, Convergent Genomics, based in San Francisco) that identifies mutations in 60 genes associated with bladder cancer. New research reported at the annual congress of the European Association of Urology described the screening model that focused on 10 key genes covered in the assay.

In training and validation cohorts, the urinary comprehensive genomic profiling test accurately predicted future bladder cancer in 66% of patient urine samples, including some that had been collected more than a decade prior to being tested, reported Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, PhD, MSc, from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

“Our results provide first evidence from a population-based cohort study of preclinical urothelial cancer detection with urinary comprehensive genomic profiling,” she told the meeting.

The results were consistent both in individuals with known risk factors for bladder cancer who were undergoing cystoscopy and in those with no evidence of disease, she said.

“Research of this nature is very encouraging, as it shows that our ability to identify molecular alterations in liquid biopsies such as urine that might indicate cancer is constantly improving,” commented Joost Boormans, MD, PhD, a urologist at the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, and a member of the EAU Scientific Congress Office.

“While we do need to develop more accurate diagnostics, it’s unlikely that we’ll have a mass screening program for bladder cancer in the near future,” he continued. “Where a urine test for genetic mutations could show its value is in reducing cystoscopies and scans in bladder cancer patients who are being monitored for recurrence, as well as those referred for blood in their urine. A simple urine test would be far easier for patients to undergo than invasive procedures or scans, as well as being less costly for health services.”

Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm and colleagues had previously shown that promoter mutations in the gene encoding for the enzyme telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) identified in urine were “promising noninvasive biomarkers” for early detection of bladder cancer.

They found that TERT mutations in urine could predict which patients were likely to develop urothelial cancer with 48% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

In the study presented at EAU23, they hypothesized that uCGP of DNA in urine could offer enhanced sensitivity for early detection of urothelial cancer.

They first used the 60-gene assay to create a training set using urine samples from 46 patients with de novo urothelial cancer, 40 with recurrent cancer, and 140 healthy controls.

They then tested the model in two validation cohorts. The first validation cohort consisted of samples from 22 patients with de novo cancer, 48 with recurrent urothelial cancer, and 96 controls from a case-control study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Ohio State University, Columbus.

The second validation cohort included 29 patients from the prospective Golestan Cohort Study who subsequently developed urothelial cancer, with 98 controls.

In all, 10 genes were identified as optimal for inclusion in a screening model, which was trained to an overall sensitivity of 88% and a 97% sensitivity for high-grade tumors, with a specificity of 94%.

In the MGH/OSU validation cohort the sensitivity of the models was 71%, and the specificity was 94%. In the Golestan cohort, the sensitivity was 66%, with a specificity of 94%. This compared favorably with the performance of the TERT-only screening model, which, as noted before, had a sensitivity of 48%, albeit with 100% specificity.

“Interestingly, when we broke down the analysis according to the lag time between urine collection and diagnosis, sensitivity increased as the time to diagnosis decreased, so the closer we got to the diagnosis, the higher was the sensitivity,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm said.

When the analysis was limited to urothelial cancers diagnosed within 7 years of sample collection, the sensitivity for detecting preclinical cancer improved to 86%, compared with 57% for a test of TERT promoter mutations alone. 

Among the patients in the Golestan cohort, uCGP-predicted positive results were associated with a more than eightfold higher risk for worse cancer-free survival, compared with uCGP-predicted negatives (hazard ratio 8.5, P < .0001).

“Of course, further studies are needed to validate this finding and to assess the clinical utility in other longitudinal cohorts,” Dr. Le Calvez-Kelm concluded.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Adults with the inflammatory autoimmune myopathy dermatomyositis are at increased for concurrent cancers, but new research suggests that certain autoantibodies in patients with a specific dermatomyositis subtype may actually protect against cancer.

A study of cohorts of patients with dermatomyositis, other rheumatic diseases, and those without disease showed that among patients with dermatomyositis positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1 (anti–TIF1-gamma) autoantibodies – a disease subtype associated with increased cancer risk – the presence of autoantibodies directed against cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (CCAR1) was associated with reduced cancer risk “to a level comparable to that seen in the general population,” Christopher A. Mecoli, MD, MHS, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues reported.

“Our prior data suggest that there are autoantigens that, when targeted simultaneously with CCAR1, provide additional cancer protection. Although these autoantigens are less frequently targeted, it is likely that additional, more prevalent ‘autoantigen hubs’ remain undiscovered,” they wrote in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Identification of other autoantibodies both in the anti–TIF1-gamma–positive and other dermatomyositis subgroups may help with cancer risk stratification in patients with the disease and may ultimately improve cancer screening for adults with dermatomyositis, the investigators said.
 

Toward precision medicine

“I think this is a step toward precision medicine in patients with rheumatic disease, specifically myositis,” Dr. Mecoli said in an interview.

The study supports earlier work showing that dermatomyositis and related myopathies are heterogeneous, he said, noting that, “if you put 10 myositis patients in the same room, you wouldn’t get that they all have the same disease because they can look so different from one another.”

The association of dermatomyositis with concurrent cancers has been known for decades, but in recent years his team and other investigators have noted that the association holds true for only some patients with dermatomyositis, most notably those patients positive for anti–TIF1-gamma autoantibodies.

“And then, of course, once you really start studying just one gamma-positive dermatomyositis patient, you realize that even among that group it is heterogeneous in terms of their cancer risk, and that was the main focus of this study: to reconcile this clinical observation that I had a lot of patients with TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis who never get diagnosed with cancer,” Dr. Mecoli said.

Study details

Dr. Dr. Mecoli and colleagues previously reported that immune responses to CCAR1 and other autoantigens seen in patients with dermatomyositis were associated with lower probability of cancer occurrence.

In the current study, they focused on the disease specificity, clinical phenotype, and cancer risk for patients with dermatomyositis and anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies.

They looked at all patients aged 18 or older with a probable or definite finding of dermatomyositis, according to 2017 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy criteria, who were seen at Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center from August 2004 to April 2020 (101 patients), or the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center (141 patients) from January 2007 to December 2020.

Controls included 44 patients evaluated at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, 186 patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis (defined as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay readout of less than seven units) evaluated at either Stanford or Johns Hopkins, 44 patients with inclusion body myositis evaluated at Johns Hopkins, and 46 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort. The investigators also assayed serum from 32 healthy individuals.

They found that patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis were significantly more likely than those with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis to have anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies (32% vs. 8%; P < .001). Additionally, they noted that the anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies were not seen in serum from healthy controls and were found at only very low frequencies among patients with other rheumatic diseases.

When they looked at the incidence of cancer from the time of dermatomyositis onset (defined as the first patient-reported symptoms of rash, weakness, myalgia, or dyspnea) they found that the standardized incidence ratio in anti–TIF1-gamma–positive patients in both the Stanford and Hopkins cohorts was higher than expected, with SIRs of 3.49 and 4.54, respectively (P < .001 for each comparison).

However, among those patients who were both anti–TIF1-gamma positive and anti-CCAR1 positive, the SIRs were 1.78 in the Stanford cohort and 1.61 in the Hopkins cohort, and neither SIR was significantly higher than that of the general population.
 

Risk prediction

Their findings suggest that autoantibody profiles might be used for cancer risk stratification in patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis, Dr. Mecoli said.

“Are we overscreening? What is the cost in terms of patient anxiety, in terms of radiation, and in terms of false positive results?” he asked. “If I had a patient in front of me with anti–TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis, I would probably manage them differently if I knew that they were CCAR1 positive, because the presence of that additional autoantibody attenuates their cancer risk relative to the general population.”

In an editorial accompanying the study, Manabu Fujimoto, MD, of the department of dermatology at Osaka (Japan) University, commented that it “is of clinical importance in that combination of autoantibodies can predict cancer risk with more accuracy. At the same time, this study will give an insight into the pathomechanisms of how antitumor activity may shape autoimmunity in dermatomyositis.”

It will be “intriguing” to discover whether anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies act only against tumors or might also have an impact on dermatomyositis itself, Dr. Fujimoto said.

The research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health; Huayi and Siuling Zhang Discovery Fund; Peter Buck, MD; and the Donald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler Foundation. The authors and Dr. Fujimoto reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Adults with the inflammatory autoimmune myopathy dermatomyositis are at increased for concurrent cancers, but new research suggests that certain autoantibodies in patients with a specific dermatomyositis subtype may actually protect against cancer.

A study of cohorts of patients with dermatomyositis, other rheumatic diseases, and those without disease showed that among patients with dermatomyositis positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1 (anti–TIF1-gamma) autoantibodies – a disease subtype associated with increased cancer risk – the presence of autoantibodies directed against cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (CCAR1) was associated with reduced cancer risk “to a level comparable to that seen in the general population,” Christopher A. Mecoli, MD, MHS, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues reported.

“Our prior data suggest that there are autoantigens that, when targeted simultaneously with CCAR1, provide additional cancer protection. Although these autoantigens are less frequently targeted, it is likely that additional, more prevalent ‘autoantigen hubs’ remain undiscovered,” they wrote in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Identification of other autoantibodies both in the anti–TIF1-gamma–positive and other dermatomyositis subgroups may help with cancer risk stratification in patients with the disease and may ultimately improve cancer screening for adults with dermatomyositis, the investigators said.
 

Toward precision medicine

“I think this is a step toward precision medicine in patients with rheumatic disease, specifically myositis,” Dr. Mecoli said in an interview.

The study supports earlier work showing that dermatomyositis and related myopathies are heterogeneous, he said, noting that, “if you put 10 myositis patients in the same room, you wouldn’t get that they all have the same disease because they can look so different from one another.”

The association of dermatomyositis with concurrent cancers has been known for decades, but in recent years his team and other investigators have noted that the association holds true for only some patients with dermatomyositis, most notably those patients positive for anti–TIF1-gamma autoantibodies.

“And then, of course, once you really start studying just one gamma-positive dermatomyositis patient, you realize that even among that group it is heterogeneous in terms of their cancer risk, and that was the main focus of this study: to reconcile this clinical observation that I had a lot of patients with TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis who never get diagnosed with cancer,” Dr. Mecoli said.

Study details

Dr. Dr. Mecoli and colleagues previously reported that immune responses to CCAR1 and other autoantigens seen in patients with dermatomyositis were associated with lower probability of cancer occurrence.

In the current study, they focused on the disease specificity, clinical phenotype, and cancer risk for patients with dermatomyositis and anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies.

They looked at all patients aged 18 or older with a probable or definite finding of dermatomyositis, according to 2017 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy criteria, who were seen at Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center from August 2004 to April 2020 (101 patients), or the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center (141 patients) from January 2007 to December 2020.

Controls included 44 patients evaluated at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, 186 patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis (defined as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay readout of less than seven units) evaluated at either Stanford or Johns Hopkins, 44 patients with inclusion body myositis evaluated at Johns Hopkins, and 46 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort. The investigators also assayed serum from 32 healthy individuals.

They found that patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis were significantly more likely than those with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis to have anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies (32% vs. 8%; P < .001). Additionally, they noted that the anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies were not seen in serum from healthy controls and were found at only very low frequencies among patients with other rheumatic diseases.

When they looked at the incidence of cancer from the time of dermatomyositis onset (defined as the first patient-reported symptoms of rash, weakness, myalgia, or dyspnea) they found that the standardized incidence ratio in anti–TIF1-gamma–positive patients in both the Stanford and Hopkins cohorts was higher than expected, with SIRs of 3.49 and 4.54, respectively (P < .001 for each comparison).

However, among those patients who were both anti–TIF1-gamma positive and anti-CCAR1 positive, the SIRs were 1.78 in the Stanford cohort and 1.61 in the Hopkins cohort, and neither SIR was significantly higher than that of the general population.
 

Risk prediction

Their findings suggest that autoantibody profiles might be used for cancer risk stratification in patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis, Dr. Mecoli said.

“Are we overscreening? What is the cost in terms of patient anxiety, in terms of radiation, and in terms of false positive results?” he asked. “If I had a patient in front of me with anti–TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis, I would probably manage them differently if I knew that they were CCAR1 positive, because the presence of that additional autoantibody attenuates their cancer risk relative to the general population.”

In an editorial accompanying the study, Manabu Fujimoto, MD, of the department of dermatology at Osaka (Japan) University, commented that it “is of clinical importance in that combination of autoantibodies can predict cancer risk with more accuracy. At the same time, this study will give an insight into the pathomechanisms of how antitumor activity may shape autoimmunity in dermatomyositis.”

It will be “intriguing” to discover whether anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies act only against tumors or might also have an impact on dermatomyositis itself, Dr. Fujimoto said.

The research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health; Huayi and Siuling Zhang Discovery Fund; Peter Buck, MD; and the Donald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler Foundation. The authors and Dr. Fujimoto reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Adults with the inflammatory autoimmune myopathy dermatomyositis are at increased for concurrent cancers, but new research suggests that certain autoantibodies in patients with a specific dermatomyositis subtype may actually protect against cancer.

A study of cohorts of patients with dermatomyositis, other rheumatic diseases, and those without disease showed that among patients with dermatomyositis positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1 (anti–TIF1-gamma) autoantibodies – a disease subtype associated with increased cancer risk – the presence of autoantibodies directed against cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (CCAR1) was associated with reduced cancer risk “to a level comparable to that seen in the general population,” Christopher A. Mecoli, MD, MHS, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues reported.

“Our prior data suggest that there are autoantigens that, when targeted simultaneously with CCAR1, provide additional cancer protection. Although these autoantigens are less frequently targeted, it is likely that additional, more prevalent ‘autoantigen hubs’ remain undiscovered,” they wrote in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Identification of other autoantibodies both in the anti–TIF1-gamma–positive and other dermatomyositis subgroups may help with cancer risk stratification in patients with the disease and may ultimately improve cancer screening for adults with dermatomyositis, the investigators said.
 

Toward precision medicine

“I think this is a step toward precision medicine in patients with rheumatic disease, specifically myositis,” Dr. Mecoli said in an interview.

The study supports earlier work showing that dermatomyositis and related myopathies are heterogeneous, he said, noting that, “if you put 10 myositis patients in the same room, you wouldn’t get that they all have the same disease because they can look so different from one another.”

The association of dermatomyositis with concurrent cancers has been known for decades, but in recent years his team and other investigators have noted that the association holds true for only some patients with dermatomyositis, most notably those patients positive for anti–TIF1-gamma autoantibodies.

“And then, of course, once you really start studying just one gamma-positive dermatomyositis patient, you realize that even among that group it is heterogeneous in terms of their cancer risk, and that was the main focus of this study: to reconcile this clinical observation that I had a lot of patients with TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis who never get diagnosed with cancer,” Dr. Mecoli said.

Study details

Dr. Dr. Mecoli and colleagues previously reported that immune responses to CCAR1 and other autoantigens seen in patients with dermatomyositis were associated with lower probability of cancer occurrence.

In the current study, they focused on the disease specificity, clinical phenotype, and cancer risk for patients with dermatomyositis and anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies.

They looked at all patients aged 18 or older with a probable or definite finding of dermatomyositis, according to 2017 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy criteria, who were seen at Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center from August 2004 to April 2020 (101 patients), or the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center (141 patients) from January 2007 to December 2020.

Controls included 44 patients evaluated at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, 186 patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis (defined as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay readout of less than seven units) evaluated at either Stanford or Johns Hopkins, 44 patients with inclusion body myositis evaluated at Johns Hopkins, and 46 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort. The investigators also assayed serum from 32 healthy individuals.

They found that patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis were significantly more likely than those with anti–TIF1-gamma–negative dermatomyositis to have anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies (32% vs. 8%; P < .001). Additionally, they noted that the anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies were not seen in serum from healthy controls and were found at only very low frequencies among patients with other rheumatic diseases.

When they looked at the incidence of cancer from the time of dermatomyositis onset (defined as the first patient-reported symptoms of rash, weakness, myalgia, or dyspnea) they found that the standardized incidence ratio in anti–TIF1-gamma–positive patients in both the Stanford and Hopkins cohorts was higher than expected, with SIRs of 3.49 and 4.54, respectively (P < .001 for each comparison).

However, among those patients who were both anti–TIF1-gamma positive and anti-CCAR1 positive, the SIRs were 1.78 in the Stanford cohort and 1.61 in the Hopkins cohort, and neither SIR was significantly higher than that of the general population.
 

Risk prediction

Their findings suggest that autoantibody profiles might be used for cancer risk stratification in patients with anti–TIF1-gamma–positive dermatomyositis, Dr. Mecoli said.

“Are we overscreening? What is the cost in terms of patient anxiety, in terms of radiation, and in terms of false positive results?” he asked. “If I had a patient in front of me with anti–TIF1-gamma dermatomyositis, I would probably manage them differently if I knew that they were CCAR1 positive, because the presence of that additional autoantibody attenuates their cancer risk relative to the general population.”

In an editorial accompanying the study, Manabu Fujimoto, MD, of the department of dermatology at Osaka (Japan) University, commented that it “is of clinical importance in that combination of autoantibodies can predict cancer risk with more accuracy. At the same time, this study will give an insight into the pathomechanisms of how antitumor activity may shape autoimmunity in dermatomyositis.”

It will be “intriguing” to discover whether anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies act only against tumors or might also have an impact on dermatomyositis itself, Dr. Fujimoto said.

The research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health; Huayi and Siuling Zhang Discovery Fund; Peter Buck, MD; and the Donald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler Foundation. The authors and Dr. Fujimoto reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

AURORA, COLO. – Inflammatory bowel disease doesn’t respect international borders, and clinicians who help in diet planning for patients with IBD should take into account cultural differences regarding food and eating, a nutrition specialist recommends.

“Many patients are in an environment that they’re not used to, an environment where most people speak English and their customs and their language may differ from the individual providing care to them. They’re often told, in addition, to eat foods that they may not even have heard of. It can really be a scary situation for many of these patients,” said Neha D. Shah, MPH, RD, CNSC, a dietitian at University of California San Francisco Health.

“Put yourself in their shoes. [Consider] what would make you feel more comfortable in that environment, and then apply that perspective to the care of your patient,” she advised colleagues at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Ms. Shah explained that by incorporating understanding of cultural differences and food culture into the care of persons with IBD, clinicians can help patients from different ethnic backgrounds accept diets that both contain familiar foods and also help to ameliorate their gastrointestinal symptoms.
 

Food culture and acculturation

As of 2016, the estimated prevalence of IBD among pediatric patients in the United States was 77 per 100,000, and the prevalence in adults was estimated at 478.4 per 100,000. In a 2021 study of the effects of race and ethnicity on the diagnosis and management of IBD, the authors estimated that the prevalence of IBD in the United States was about 3.1 million persons, or 1.3% of the population, with an increase in prevalence in non-White persons and ethnicities, she noted.

Some of the increasing prevalence among minority populations may be attributable to diet acculturation, when members of a particular group partially or completely adopt the eating patterns and/or food choices of the host country.
 

Culturally appropriate foods

The term “food culture” refers to “the sociocultural aspect of eating, and include[s] the beliefs, values, and attitudes a community may accept around food,” she said.

Ms. Shah provided examples of culturally appropriate foods that may be tolerated by patients with IBD, such as beans, tortillas, chicken with rice, guacamole, mangos, and tomatoes in persons from South America, or lentils, breads, rice, oats, spinach, and tea among patients from the Indian subcontinent.

By understanding and respecting cultural differences, learning how to best communicate with persons of other cultures, and by being aware of one’s own biases, clinicians can better help patients create diet plans that fit within their expectations and lifestyles, she said.

For example, patients can be encouraged to incorporate more culturally familiar plant-based foods such as legumes to manage active disease and maintain remissions.

Patients with active disease should have at least one-half cup of one form of culturally appropriate fiber at each meal. The dietitian should consider recommending blending fiber into other foods or serving it cooked, mashed, or minced, depending upon the patient’s level of tolerance.

During the transition phase, patients can reintroduce an additional half cup of fiber at one meal, then at two meals, and finally at three daily meals. Patients can see whether they can tolerate more raw or whole high-fiber foods at this stage.

During remissions, patients should be advised to add two to three foods containing culturally appropriate fiber at each meal, she said.
 

‘Eye-opening’ realization

“I think it’s really eye-opening for us to think about how we have to have culturally sensitive discussions with our patients,” commented Sandra Kim, MD, from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who moderated the session.

Dr. Kim asked Ms. Shah what advice she’d give to pediatric gastroenterologists about engaging patients and their families.

The clinician should ask both patients and parents about what the child eats and what the challenges of eating under certain circumstances are, and have culturally appropriate resources on hand.

Ms. Shah did not report a funding source for her work. She disclosed compensation as editor of the Journal of Practical Gastroeneterology and as GI on Demand–consultant for a joint virtual platform from the American College of Gastroenterology and Gastro Girl. She also serves as treasurer and director of operations for the South Asian IBD Alliance.
 

AURORA, COLO. – Inflammatory bowel disease doesn’t respect international borders, and clinicians who help in diet planning for patients with IBD should take into account cultural differences regarding food and eating, a nutrition specialist recommends.

“Many patients are in an environment that they’re not used to, an environment where most people speak English and their customs and their language may differ from the individual providing care to them. They’re often told, in addition, to eat foods that they may not even have heard of. It can really be a scary situation for many of these patients,” said Neha D. Shah, MPH, RD, CNSC, a dietitian at University of California San Francisco Health.

“Put yourself in their shoes. [Consider] what would make you feel more comfortable in that environment, and then apply that perspective to the care of your patient,” she advised colleagues at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Ms. Shah explained that by incorporating understanding of cultural differences and food culture into the care of persons with IBD, clinicians can help patients from different ethnic backgrounds accept diets that both contain familiar foods and also help to ameliorate their gastrointestinal symptoms.
 

Food culture and acculturation

As of 2016, the estimated prevalence of IBD among pediatric patients in the United States was 77 per 100,000, and the prevalence in adults was estimated at 478.4 per 100,000. In a 2021 study of the effects of race and ethnicity on the diagnosis and management of IBD, the authors estimated that the prevalence of IBD in the United States was about 3.1 million persons, or 1.3% of the population, with an increase in prevalence in non-White persons and ethnicities, she noted.

Some of the increasing prevalence among minority populations may be attributable to diet acculturation, when members of a particular group partially or completely adopt the eating patterns and/or food choices of the host country.
 

Culturally appropriate foods

The term “food culture” refers to “the sociocultural aspect of eating, and include[s] the beliefs, values, and attitudes a community may accept around food,” she said.

Ms. Shah provided examples of culturally appropriate foods that may be tolerated by patients with IBD, such as beans, tortillas, chicken with rice, guacamole, mangos, and tomatoes in persons from South America, or lentils, breads, rice, oats, spinach, and tea among patients from the Indian subcontinent.

By understanding and respecting cultural differences, learning how to best communicate with persons of other cultures, and by being aware of one’s own biases, clinicians can better help patients create diet plans that fit within their expectations and lifestyles, she said.

For example, patients can be encouraged to incorporate more culturally familiar plant-based foods such as legumes to manage active disease and maintain remissions.

Patients with active disease should have at least one-half cup of one form of culturally appropriate fiber at each meal. The dietitian should consider recommending blending fiber into other foods or serving it cooked, mashed, or minced, depending upon the patient’s level of tolerance.

During the transition phase, patients can reintroduce an additional half cup of fiber at one meal, then at two meals, and finally at three daily meals. Patients can see whether they can tolerate more raw or whole high-fiber foods at this stage.

During remissions, patients should be advised to add two to three foods containing culturally appropriate fiber at each meal, she said.
 

‘Eye-opening’ realization

“I think it’s really eye-opening for us to think about how we have to have culturally sensitive discussions with our patients,” commented Sandra Kim, MD, from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who moderated the session.

Dr. Kim asked Ms. Shah what advice she’d give to pediatric gastroenterologists about engaging patients and their families.

The clinician should ask both patients and parents about what the child eats and what the challenges of eating under certain circumstances are, and have culturally appropriate resources on hand.

Ms. Shah did not report a funding source for her work. She disclosed compensation as editor of the Journal of Practical Gastroeneterology and as GI on Demand–consultant for a joint virtual platform from the American College of Gastroenterology and Gastro Girl. She also serves as treasurer and director of operations for the South Asian IBD Alliance.
 

AURORA, COLO. – Inflammatory bowel disease doesn’t respect international borders, and clinicians who help in diet planning for patients with IBD should take into account cultural differences regarding food and eating, a nutrition specialist recommends.

“Many patients are in an environment that they’re not used to, an environment where most people speak English and their customs and their language may differ from the individual providing care to them. They’re often told, in addition, to eat foods that they may not even have heard of. It can really be a scary situation for many of these patients,” said Neha D. Shah, MPH, RD, CNSC, a dietitian at University of California San Francisco Health.

“Put yourself in their shoes. [Consider] what would make you feel more comfortable in that environment, and then apply that perspective to the care of your patient,” she advised colleagues at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Ms. Shah explained that by incorporating understanding of cultural differences and food culture into the care of persons with IBD, clinicians can help patients from different ethnic backgrounds accept diets that both contain familiar foods and also help to ameliorate their gastrointestinal symptoms.
 

Food culture and acculturation

As of 2016, the estimated prevalence of IBD among pediatric patients in the United States was 77 per 100,000, and the prevalence in adults was estimated at 478.4 per 100,000. In a 2021 study of the effects of race and ethnicity on the diagnosis and management of IBD, the authors estimated that the prevalence of IBD in the United States was about 3.1 million persons, or 1.3% of the population, with an increase in prevalence in non-White persons and ethnicities, she noted.

Some of the increasing prevalence among minority populations may be attributable to diet acculturation, when members of a particular group partially or completely adopt the eating patterns and/or food choices of the host country.
 

Culturally appropriate foods

The term “food culture” refers to “the sociocultural aspect of eating, and include[s] the beliefs, values, and attitudes a community may accept around food,” she said.

Ms. Shah provided examples of culturally appropriate foods that may be tolerated by patients with IBD, such as beans, tortillas, chicken with rice, guacamole, mangos, and tomatoes in persons from South America, or lentils, breads, rice, oats, spinach, and tea among patients from the Indian subcontinent.

By understanding and respecting cultural differences, learning how to best communicate with persons of other cultures, and by being aware of one’s own biases, clinicians can better help patients create diet plans that fit within their expectations and lifestyles, she said.

For example, patients can be encouraged to incorporate more culturally familiar plant-based foods such as legumes to manage active disease and maintain remissions.

Patients with active disease should have at least one-half cup of one form of culturally appropriate fiber at each meal. The dietitian should consider recommending blending fiber into other foods or serving it cooked, mashed, or minced, depending upon the patient’s level of tolerance.

During the transition phase, patients can reintroduce an additional half cup of fiber at one meal, then at two meals, and finally at three daily meals. Patients can see whether they can tolerate more raw or whole high-fiber foods at this stage.

During remissions, patients should be advised to add two to three foods containing culturally appropriate fiber at each meal, she said.
 

‘Eye-opening’ realization

“I think it’s really eye-opening for us to think about how we have to have culturally sensitive discussions with our patients,” commented Sandra Kim, MD, from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who moderated the session.

Dr. Kim asked Ms. Shah what advice she’d give to pediatric gastroenterologists about engaging patients and their families.

The clinician should ask both patients and parents about what the child eats and what the challenges of eating under certain circumstances are, and have culturally appropriate resources on hand.

Ms. Shah did not report a funding source for her work. She disclosed compensation as editor of the Journal of Practical Gastroeneterology and as GI on Demand–consultant for a joint virtual platform from the American College of Gastroenterology and Gastro Girl. She also serves as treasurer and director of operations for the South Asian IBD Alliance.
 

AURORA, COLO. – A combination of two over-the-counter herbal extracts – curcumin and qing dai – induced remissions in a significant proportion of patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a small placebo-controlled trial.

Among 42 patients randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive either an enteric-coated pill containing 3 g of curcumin and qing-dai (CurQD) or placebo for 8 weeks, 43% of those assigned to receive the combination met the co-primary endpoint of a significant reduction in disease activity and objective evidence of response, compared with 8% of those assigned to placebo, reported Shomron Ben-Horin, MD, of Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv, Israel, and colleagues.

“In this randomized multicenter placebo-controlled trial, combination CurQD was found effective for inducing remission in active UC patients, including biologic-experienced patients,” they wrote in a scientific poster presented at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.
 

Nice spice

Curcumin is a polyphenolic compound derived from the spice turmeric that has been shown to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. Qing-dai (QD), also known as indigo naturalis, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine as an anti-inflammatory. Both agents are available over the counter in the United States, and have been on the market in Israel as a combination since 2016, said coauthor Nir Salomon, a certified herbalist at Sheba Medical Center.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

“What we have here is a combination of these two compounds that are specifically sourced – the gut-directed curcumin, which we developed, and the specifically-sourced QD, and we use them in a specific protocol with a formulation suitable for moderate to severe disease,” he said in an interview.

Mr. Salomon and colleagues in Israel and in Athens, Greece, tested CurQD in a two-part trial. The first part was a 4-week open-label study of CurQD in 10 patients with active UC defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score of 5 or greater and a modified Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or greater.

Part 2 was the placebo-controlled trial described before, with 42 patients with active UC. For 49% of these patients immunomodulatory and/or biologic therapies had failed to induce or maintain remissions.

A total of 43% of patients assigned to CurQD met the primary combined endpoint of a reduction in SCCAI of at least 3 points and objective evidence of response, consisting of either a Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of 1 or greater, or at least 50% reduction in calprotectin.

In all, 85.7% of patients assigned to CurQD had a clinical response, compared with 30.7% of those assigned to placebo (P < .001).

In addition, 75% of patients on CurQD had endoscopic improvement, compared with 20% on placebo (P = .036), and more patients on the combined supplement had at least 50% reductions in calprotectin levels (46.4% vs. 15.4%, respectively), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Patients randomized to CurQD had significantly better resolution of rectal bleeding by day 12 (P value not shown).

Eight additional weeks of maintenance on curcumin alone resulted in 93% retention at week 16 of clinical response, 80% retention of remissions, and 40% maintenance of clinical biomarker responses.

CurQD, but not placebo, was associated with activation of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) pathway. AhR is a nuclear receptor that has been implicated as a mediator of inflammatory bowel disease.

“Induction of AhR merits further study as [a] potential treatment target in active UC,” the investigators wrote.
 

Small molecule

“This is a very promising and nicely conducted trial. Previously there are separate trials both determining potential mechanisms of action as well as efficacy of curcumin and Qing Dai separately in this population. This is a nice study that uses the combination in patients with mild to moderate UC,” said Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, a gastroenterology physician and researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Immunosuppressive treatments are very effective in our patients with IBD but there remains concern (particularly for patients) about the consequences of immunosuppression including risk of treatment associated cancer. Thus, there is a lot of interest in rigorous studies of nonimmunosuppressive treatments that may still be effective in relieving objective inflammation (apart from just symptomatic improvement). This study provides a nice evidence base for that. There remain multiple limitations including small sample size, potential generalizability to other populations, and importantly whether the efficacy is driven by curcumin or Qing Dai,” he said in reply to a request for independent commentary.

Dr. Ananthakrishnan was not involved in the study.

“This is great work! We are also studying Qing Dai/indigo naturalis and have developed a single small molecule that works similarly to this therapy,” Matt Davidson, PhD, of Azora Therapeutics in Encino, Calif., said in an online chat section of the meeting website.

In a separate scientific poster presented at the meeting, Dr. Davidson and Julie Saiki, PhD, also from Azora, reported that their company is developing a novel synthetic small molecule prodrug of indirubin, an AhR agonist derived from indigo that is purported to maximize colonic exposure while minimizing systemic exposure.

In mouse models of colitis, oral administration of the prodrug significantly reduced Disease Activity Index and weight loss similar in magnitude to the active compound indirubin, they reported.

The study was supported by Sheba Medical Center. Mr. Salomon disclosed speaking fees from various companies and has received consulting fees and has an equity position in EvNature, the manufacturer of CurQD. Dr. Ananthakrishnan reported having no disclosures relative to the study. Dr. Davidson is CEO and cofounder of Avora Therapeutics.

AURORA, COLO. – A combination of two over-the-counter herbal extracts – curcumin and qing dai – induced remissions in a significant proportion of patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a small placebo-controlled trial.

Among 42 patients randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive either an enteric-coated pill containing 3 g of curcumin and qing-dai (CurQD) or placebo for 8 weeks, 43% of those assigned to receive the combination met the co-primary endpoint of a significant reduction in disease activity and objective evidence of response, compared with 8% of those assigned to placebo, reported Shomron Ben-Horin, MD, of Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv, Israel, and colleagues.

“In this randomized multicenter placebo-controlled trial, combination CurQD was found effective for inducing remission in active UC patients, including biologic-experienced patients,” they wrote in a scientific poster presented at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.
 

Nice spice

Curcumin is a polyphenolic compound derived from the spice turmeric that has been shown to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. Qing-dai (QD), also known as indigo naturalis, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine as an anti-inflammatory. Both agents are available over the counter in the United States, and have been on the market in Israel as a combination since 2016, said coauthor Nir Salomon, a certified herbalist at Sheba Medical Center.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

“What we have here is a combination of these two compounds that are specifically sourced – the gut-directed curcumin, which we developed, and the specifically-sourced QD, and we use them in a specific protocol with a formulation suitable for moderate to severe disease,” he said in an interview.

Mr. Salomon and colleagues in Israel and in Athens, Greece, tested CurQD in a two-part trial. The first part was a 4-week open-label study of CurQD in 10 patients with active UC defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score of 5 or greater and a modified Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or greater.

Part 2 was the placebo-controlled trial described before, with 42 patients with active UC. For 49% of these patients immunomodulatory and/or biologic therapies had failed to induce or maintain remissions.

A total of 43% of patients assigned to CurQD met the primary combined endpoint of a reduction in SCCAI of at least 3 points and objective evidence of response, consisting of either a Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of 1 or greater, or at least 50% reduction in calprotectin.

In all, 85.7% of patients assigned to CurQD had a clinical response, compared with 30.7% of those assigned to placebo (P < .001).

In addition, 75% of patients on CurQD had endoscopic improvement, compared with 20% on placebo (P = .036), and more patients on the combined supplement had at least 50% reductions in calprotectin levels (46.4% vs. 15.4%, respectively), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Patients randomized to CurQD had significantly better resolution of rectal bleeding by day 12 (P value not shown).

Eight additional weeks of maintenance on curcumin alone resulted in 93% retention at week 16 of clinical response, 80% retention of remissions, and 40% maintenance of clinical biomarker responses.

CurQD, but not placebo, was associated with activation of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) pathway. AhR is a nuclear receptor that has been implicated as a mediator of inflammatory bowel disease.

“Induction of AhR merits further study as [a] potential treatment target in active UC,” the investigators wrote.
 

Small molecule

“This is a very promising and nicely conducted trial. Previously there are separate trials both determining potential mechanisms of action as well as efficacy of curcumin and Qing Dai separately in this population. This is a nice study that uses the combination in patients with mild to moderate UC,” said Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, a gastroenterology physician and researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Immunosuppressive treatments are very effective in our patients with IBD but there remains concern (particularly for patients) about the consequences of immunosuppression including risk of treatment associated cancer. Thus, there is a lot of interest in rigorous studies of nonimmunosuppressive treatments that may still be effective in relieving objective inflammation (apart from just symptomatic improvement). This study provides a nice evidence base for that. There remain multiple limitations including small sample size, potential generalizability to other populations, and importantly whether the efficacy is driven by curcumin or Qing Dai,” he said in reply to a request for independent commentary.

Dr. Ananthakrishnan was not involved in the study.

“This is great work! We are also studying Qing Dai/indigo naturalis and have developed a single small molecule that works similarly to this therapy,” Matt Davidson, PhD, of Azora Therapeutics in Encino, Calif., said in an online chat section of the meeting website.

In a separate scientific poster presented at the meeting, Dr. Davidson and Julie Saiki, PhD, also from Azora, reported that their company is developing a novel synthetic small molecule prodrug of indirubin, an AhR agonist derived from indigo that is purported to maximize colonic exposure while minimizing systemic exposure.

In mouse models of colitis, oral administration of the prodrug significantly reduced Disease Activity Index and weight loss similar in magnitude to the active compound indirubin, they reported.

The study was supported by Sheba Medical Center. Mr. Salomon disclosed speaking fees from various companies and has received consulting fees and has an equity position in EvNature, the manufacturer of CurQD. Dr. Ananthakrishnan reported having no disclosures relative to the study. Dr. Davidson is CEO and cofounder of Avora Therapeutics.

AURORA, COLO. – A combination of two over-the-counter herbal extracts – curcumin and qing dai – induced remissions in a significant proportion of patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a small placebo-controlled trial.

Among 42 patients randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive either an enteric-coated pill containing 3 g of curcumin and qing-dai (CurQD) or placebo for 8 weeks, 43% of those assigned to receive the combination met the co-primary endpoint of a significant reduction in disease activity and objective evidence of response, compared with 8% of those assigned to placebo, reported Shomron Ben-Horin, MD, of Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv, Israel, and colleagues.

“In this randomized multicenter placebo-controlled trial, combination CurQD was found effective for inducing remission in active UC patients, including biologic-experienced patients,” they wrote in a scientific poster presented at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.
 

Nice spice

Curcumin is a polyphenolic compound derived from the spice turmeric that has been shown to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. Qing-dai (QD), also known as indigo naturalis, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine as an anti-inflammatory. Both agents are available over the counter in the United States, and have been on the market in Israel as a combination since 2016, said coauthor Nir Salomon, a certified herbalist at Sheba Medical Center.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

“What we have here is a combination of these two compounds that are specifically sourced – the gut-directed curcumin, which we developed, and the specifically-sourced QD, and we use them in a specific protocol with a formulation suitable for moderate to severe disease,” he said in an interview.

Mr. Salomon and colleagues in Israel and in Athens, Greece, tested CurQD in a two-part trial. The first part was a 4-week open-label study of CurQD in 10 patients with active UC defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score of 5 or greater and a modified Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or greater.

Part 2 was the placebo-controlled trial described before, with 42 patients with active UC. For 49% of these patients immunomodulatory and/or biologic therapies had failed to induce or maintain remissions.

A total of 43% of patients assigned to CurQD met the primary combined endpoint of a reduction in SCCAI of at least 3 points and objective evidence of response, consisting of either a Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of 1 or greater, or at least 50% reduction in calprotectin.

In all, 85.7% of patients assigned to CurQD had a clinical response, compared with 30.7% of those assigned to placebo (P < .001).

In addition, 75% of patients on CurQD had endoscopic improvement, compared with 20% on placebo (P = .036), and more patients on the combined supplement had at least 50% reductions in calprotectin levels (46.4% vs. 15.4%, respectively), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Patients randomized to CurQD had significantly better resolution of rectal bleeding by day 12 (P value not shown).

Eight additional weeks of maintenance on curcumin alone resulted in 93% retention at week 16 of clinical response, 80% retention of remissions, and 40% maintenance of clinical biomarker responses.

CurQD, but not placebo, was associated with activation of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) pathway. AhR is a nuclear receptor that has been implicated as a mediator of inflammatory bowel disease.

“Induction of AhR merits further study as [a] potential treatment target in active UC,” the investigators wrote.
 

Small molecule

“This is a very promising and nicely conducted trial. Previously there are separate trials both determining potential mechanisms of action as well as efficacy of curcumin and Qing Dai separately in this population. This is a nice study that uses the combination in patients with mild to moderate UC,” said Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, a gastroenterology physician and researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Immunosuppressive treatments are very effective in our patients with IBD but there remains concern (particularly for patients) about the consequences of immunosuppression including risk of treatment associated cancer. Thus, there is a lot of interest in rigorous studies of nonimmunosuppressive treatments that may still be effective in relieving objective inflammation (apart from just symptomatic improvement). This study provides a nice evidence base for that. There remain multiple limitations including small sample size, potential generalizability to other populations, and importantly whether the efficacy is driven by curcumin or Qing Dai,” he said in reply to a request for independent commentary.

Dr. Ananthakrishnan was not involved in the study.

“This is great work! We are also studying Qing Dai/indigo naturalis and have developed a single small molecule that works similarly to this therapy,” Matt Davidson, PhD, of Azora Therapeutics in Encino, Calif., said in an online chat section of the meeting website.

In a separate scientific poster presented at the meeting, Dr. Davidson and Julie Saiki, PhD, also from Azora, reported that their company is developing a novel synthetic small molecule prodrug of indirubin, an AhR agonist derived from indigo that is purported to maximize colonic exposure while minimizing systemic exposure.

In mouse models of colitis, oral administration of the prodrug significantly reduced Disease Activity Index and weight loss similar in magnitude to the active compound indirubin, they reported.

The study was supported by Sheba Medical Center. Mr. Salomon disclosed speaking fees from various companies and has received consulting fees and has an equity position in EvNature, the manufacturer of CurQD. Dr. Ananthakrishnan reported having no disclosures relative to the study. Dr. Davidson is CEO and cofounder of Avora Therapeutics.

AURORA, COLO. – Perianal Crohn’s disease with fistula is notoriously difficult to treat and can make patients’ lives miserable, but a new, minimally invasive approach involving local injection of mesenchymal stem cells is both safe and, in a significant proportion of patients, highly effective, according to a colorectal surgeon.

“It’s a really debilitating phenotype, a spectrum of phenotypes,” Amy Lightner, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic said at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Although some patients have minimal symptoms, others may require multiple setons to aid in drainage and healing, while others may require fistulotomy, endorectal advancement flap, intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure, diversion, or proctectomy.

“Why is it so difficult to treat? Well, part of it is that this is an anatomic defect, and this is why 90% of patients will come to the operating room and will see their surgeons on a frequent basis. The other part of that is that we have medical therapies to treat these fistulas but they’re really largely ineffective, because there is that anatomical defect, the hole there that needs to be closed,” Dr. Lightner said.

Up to 20% of patients may require a permanent stoma, and an additional 20% may require temporary fecal diversion.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are derived from bone marrow, fat stores, or umbilical cord tissues. Unlike embryonic stem cells, which have the ability to metamorphose into a multitude of other cell types, mesenchymal stem cells are differentiated “adult” cells.

They work by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and recruiting immune cells to stimulate tissue repair and healing. The cells are delivered in a minimally invasive outpatient setting, and there is no risk of incontinence compared with more invasive procedures such as fistulotomy or advancement flaps.
 

Effective and safe

MSCs were first used in Spain in 2003 to successfully treat a young women with a complex fistula with five perianal tracts converging into a rectovaginal fistula. The investigators injected a single dose of 9 x 10⁶ MSCs into the site, and the fistula healed within 3 months.

Since then in multiple clinical trials involving more than 400 patients, injection of MSCs has resulted in fistula closure and complete healing by 8-12 weeks in 50%-85% of patients, Dr. Lightner said.

The treatment effect is also durable, she said, pointing to data from the ADMIRE-CD study, in which 51.5% of Crohn’s disease patients with treatment-refractory complex perianal fistula were healed at 24 weeks following injection of adipose-derived stem cells, compared with 35.6% of controls. At 1 year of follow-up, respective rates of healing were 56.3% vs. 38.6%.

Dr. Lightner also cited a case report of a patient whose fistula remained healed 4 years after receiving MSCs for refractory perianal Crohn’s fistulas.

Although MSCs are derived from healthy donors, they do not bear cellular surface antigens that would instigate a destructive host immune response, and to date, there have been no reports from clinical trials of systemic infections or complications. The most frequently reported adverse events have been injection-site pain in about 12%-15% of patients, and perianal abscess in 5%-13%, with similar frequencies in treatment and control groups.

Dr. Lightner and colleagues are currently exploring additional indications for stem cell therapy with MSCs, including other complex fistula phenotypes, intestinal Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis.
 

Other approaches

In a separate presentation, James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia talked about what would be needed to achieve a “medical moonshot” with the goal of curing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and touched on hematopoietic stem cell transplants as a potential option for patients with chronic, severe, and intractable disease.

One of his patients was a woman in her 60s who was diagnosed with stricturing and penetrating Crohn’s disease in her 30s, with the disease involving the ileum and entire colon. She had previously undergone three small bowel resections and a partial colon resection, and had never experienced remission despite taking steroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, four anti-TNF drugs, ustekinumab (Stelara), and vedolizumab (Entyvio).

Following an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, she had a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) of 0. Her course was complicated by demand ischemia and acute kidney injury.

An IBD specialist who was not involved in either study commented in an interview that both MSCs and stem cell transplants show promise for treatment-refractory IBD,

“Both approaches are very promising, but stem cell transplants for IBD haven’t been formally studied yet so the data aren’t as strong, but there is promise for the future,” said Berkeley N. Limketkai, MD, PhD, from the University of California, Los Angeles.

“The challenges, however, are also the morbidity associated with actually undergoing such procedures,” he continued. Short- and long-term morbidities associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplants may include mucositis; hemorrhagic cystitis; prolonged, severe pancytopenia; infection; graft-versus-host disease; graft failure; pulmonary complications, veno-occlusive disease of the liver; and thrombotic microangiopathy.

Dr. Limketkai said that over time as the protocols for stem cell transplants in IBD improve, the benefits for select patients may more clearly outweigh the risks.

Dr. Lightner’s work is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery. She disclosed consulting fees from Boomerang Medical, Mesoblast Limited, Ossium Health, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA. Dr. Lewis’ work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, and from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, and Nestlé Health Science. He has also served as a consultant to and data safety monitoring board member for several entities. Dr. Limketkai disclosed consulting for Azora Therapeutics.

AURORA, COLO. – Perianal Crohn’s disease with fistula is notoriously difficult to treat and can make patients’ lives miserable, but a new, minimally invasive approach involving local injection of mesenchymal stem cells is both safe and, in a significant proportion of patients, highly effective, according to a colorectal surgeon.

“It’s a really debilitating phenotype, a spectrum of phenotypes,” Amy Lightner, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic said at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Although some patients have minimal symptoms, others may require multiple setons to aid in drainage and healing, while others may require fistulotomy, endorectal advancement flap, intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure, diversion, or proctectomy.

“Why is it so difficult to treat? Well, part of it is that this is an anatomic defect, and this is why 90% of patients will come to the operating room and will see their surgeons on a frequent basis. The other part of that is that we have medical therapies to treat these fistulas but they’re really largely ineffective, because there is that anatomical defect, the hole there that needs to be closed,” Dr. Lightner said.

Up to 20% of patients may require a permanent stoma, and an additional 20% may require temporary fecal diversion.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are derived from bone marrow, fat stores, or umbilical cord tissues. Unlike embryonic stem cells, which have the ability to metamorphose into a multitude of other cell types, mesenchymal stem cells are differentiated “adult” cells.

They work by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and recruiting immune cells to stimulate tissue repair and healing. The cells are delivered in a minimally invasive outpatient setting, and there is no risk of incontinence compared with more invasive procedures such as fistulotomy or advancement flaps.
 

Effective and safe

MSCs were first used in Spain in 2003 to successfully treat a young women with a complex fistula with five perianal tracts converging into a rectovaginal fistula. The investigators injected a single dose of 9 x 10⁶ MSCs into the site, and the fistula healed within 3 months.

Since then in multiple clinical trials involving more than 400 patients, injection of MSCs has resulted in fistula closure and complete healing by 8-12 weeks in 50%-85% of patients, Dr. Lightner said.

The treatment effect is also durable, she said, pointing to data from the ADMIRE-CD study, in which 51.5% of Crohn’s disease patients with treatment-refractory complex perianal fistula were healed at 24 weeks following injection of adipose-derived stem cells, compared with 35.6% of controls. At 1 year of follow-up, respective rates of healing were 56.3% vs. 38.6%.

Dr. Lightner also cited a case report of a patient whose fistula remained healed 4 years after receiving MSCs for refractory perianal Crohn’s fistulas.

Although MSCs are derived from healthy donors, they do not bear cellular surface antigens that would instigate a destructive host immune response, and to date, there have been no reports from clinical trials of systemic infections or complications. The most frequently reported adverse events have been injection-site pain in about 12%-15% of patients, and perianal abscess in 5%-13%, with similar frequencies in treatment and control groups.

Dr. Lightner and colleagues are currently exploring additional indications for stem cell therapy with MSCs, including other complex fistula phenotypes, intestinal Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis.
 

Other approaches

In a separate presentation, James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia talked about what would be needed to achieve a “medical moonshot” with the goal of curing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and touched on hematopoietic stem cell transplants as a potential option for patients with chronic, severe, and intractable disease.

One of his patients was a woman in her 60s who was diagnosed with stricturing and penetrating Crohn’s disease in her 30s, with the disease involving the ileum and entire colon. She had previously undergone three small bowel resections and a partial colon resection, and had never experienced remission despite taking steroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, four anti-TNF drugs, ustekinumab (Stelara), and vedolizumab (Entyvio).

Following an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, she had a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) of 0. Her course was complicated by demand ischemia and acute kidney injury.

An IBD specialist who was not involved in either study commented in an interview that both MSCs and stem cell transplants show promise for treatment-refractory IBD,

“Both approaches are very promising, but stem cell transplants for IBD haven’t been formally studied yet so the data aren’t as strong, but there is promise for the future,” said Berkeley N. Limketkai, MD, PhD, from the University of California, Los Angeles.

“The challenges, however, are also the morbidity associated with actually undergoing such procedures,” he continued. Short- and long-term morbidities associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplants may include mucositis; hemorrhagic cystitis; prolonged, severe pancytopenia; infection; graft-versus-host disease; graft failure; pulmonary complications, veno-occlusive disease of the liver; and thrombotic microangiopathy.

Dr. Limketkai said that over time as the protocols for stem cell transplants in IBD improve, the benefits for select patients may more clearly outweigh the risks.

Dr. Lightner’s work is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery. She disclosed consulting fees from Boomerang Medical, Mesoblast Limited, Ossium Health, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA. Dr. Lewis’ work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, and from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, and Nestlé Health Science. He has also served as a consultant to and data safety monitoring board member for several entities. Dr. Limketkai disclosed consulting for Azora Therapeutics.

AURORA, COLO. – Perianal Crohn’s disease with fistula is notoriously difficult to treat and can make patients’ lives miserable, but a new, minimally invasive approach involving local injection of mesenchymal stem cells is both safe and, in a significant proportion of patients, highly effective, according to a colorectal surgeon.

“It’s a really debilitating phenotype, a spectrum of phenotypes,” Amy Lightner, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic said at the annual Crohn’s & Colitis Congress®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Although some patients have minimal symptoms, others may require multiple setons to aid in drainage and healing, while others may require fistulotomy, endorectal advancement flap, intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure, diversion, or proctectomy.

“Why is it so difficult to treat? Well, part of it is that this is an anatomic defect, and this is why 90% of patients will come to the operating room and will see their surgeons on a frequent basis. The other part of that is that we have medical therapies to treat these fistulas but they’re really largely ineffective, because there is that anatomical defect, the hole there that needs to be closed,” Dr. Lightner said.

Up to 20% of patients may require a permanent stoma, and an additional 20% may require temporary fecal diversion.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are derived from bone marrow, fat stores, or umbilical cord tissues. Unlike embryonic stem cells, which have the ability to metamorphose into a multitude of other cell types, mesenchymal stem cells are differentiated “adult” cells.

They work by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and recruiting immune cells to stimulate tissue repair and healing. The cells are delivered in a minimally invasive outpatient setting, and there is no risk of incontinence compared with more invasive procedures such as fistulotomy or advancement flaps.
 

Effective and safe

MSCs were first used in Spain in 2003 to successfully treat a young women with a complex fistula with five perianal tracts converging into a rectovaginal fistula. The investigators injected a single dose of 9 x 10⁶ MSCs into the site, and the fistula healed within 3 months.

Since then in multiple clinical trials involving more than 400 patients, injection of MSCs has resulted in fistula closure and complete healing by 8-12 weeks in 50%-85% of patients, Dr. Lightner said.

The treatment effect is also durable, she said, pointing to data from the ADMIRE-CD study, in which 51.5% of Crohn’s disease patients with treatment-refractory complex perianal fistula were healed at 24 weeks following injection of adipose-derived stem cells, compared with 35.6% of controls. At 1 year of follow-up, respective rates of healing were 56.3% vs. 38.6%.

Dr. Lightner also cited a case report of a patient whose fistula remained healed 4 years after receiving MSCs for refractory perianal Crohn’s fistulas.

Although MSCs are derived from healthy donors, they do not bear cellular surface antigens that would instigate a destructive host immune response, and to date, there have been no reports from clinical trials of systemic infections or complications. The most frequently reported adverse events have been injection-site pain in about 12%-15% of patients, and perianal abscess in 5%-13%, with similar frequencies in treatment and control groups.

Dr. Lightner and colleagues are currently exploring additional indications for stem cell therapy with MSCs, including other complex fistula phenotypes, intestinal Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis.
 

Other approaches

In a separate presentation, James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia talked about what would be needed to achieve a “medical moonshot” with the goal of curing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and touched on hematopoietic stem cell transplants as a potential option for patients with chronic, severe, and intractable disease.

One of his patients was a woman in her 60s who was diagnosed with stricturing and penetrating Crohn’s disease in her 30s, with the disease involving the ileum and entire colon. She had previously undergone three small bowel resections and a partial colon resection, and had never experienced remission despite taking steroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, four anti-TNF drugs, ustekinumab (Stelara), and vedolizumab (Entyvio).

Following an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, she had a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) of 0. Her course was complicated by demand ischemia and acute kidney injury.

An IBD specialist who was not involved in either study commented in an interview that both MSCs and stem cell transplants show promise for treatment-refractory IBD,

“Both approaches are very promising, but stem cell transplants for IBD haven’t been formally studied yet so the data aren’t as strong, but there is promise for the future,” said Berkeley N. Limketkai, MD, PhD, from the University of California, Los Angeles.

“The challenges, however, are also the morbidity associated with actually undergoing such procedures,” he continued. Short- and long-term morbidities associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplants may include mucositis; hemorrhagic cystitis; prolonged, severe pancytopenia; infection; graft-versus-host disease; graft failure; pulmonary complications, veno-occlusive disease of the liver; and thrombotic microangiopathy.

Dr. Limketkai said that over time as the protocols for stem cell transplants in IBD improve, the benefits for select patients may more clearly outweigh the risks.

Dr. Lightner’s work is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery. She disclosed consulting fees from Boomerang Medical, Mesoblast Limited, Ossium Health, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA. Dr. Lewis’ work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, and from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, and Nestlé Health Science. He has also served as a consultant to and data safety monitoring board member for several entities. Dr. Limketkai disclosed consulting for Azora Therapeutics.