Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Correction: Diabetes management

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:12
Display Headline
Correction: Diabetes management

Information was omitted from Table 1 on page 596 of the article, Makin V, Lansang MC. Diabetes management: beyond hemoglobin A1c (Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86[9]:595–600, doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18031).

The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors pose a low risk of hypoglyemia, and that should have been noted in the table. The corrected table appears below and online.

Table 1. Advantages of selected type 2 diabetes drugs

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
760
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Information was omitted from Table 1 on page 596 of the article, Makin V, Lansang MC. Diabetes management: beyond hemoglobin A1c (Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86[9]:595–600, doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18031).

The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors pose a low risk of hypoglyemia, and that should have been noted in the table. The corrected table appears below and online.

Table 1. Advantages of selected type 2 diabetes drugs

Information was omitted from Table 1 on page 596 of the article, Makin V, Lansang MC. Diabetes management: beyond hemoglobin A1c (Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86[9]:595–600, doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18031).

The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors pose a low risk of hypoglyemia, and that should have been noted in the table. The corrected table appears below and online.

Table 1. Advantages of selected type 2 diabetes drugs

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(11)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(11)
Page Number
760
Page Number
760
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Diabetes management
Display Headline
Correction: Diabetes management
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 10/29/2019 - 07:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 10/29/2019 - 07:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 10/29/2019 - 07:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Correction: Subclinical hypothyroidism

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 06/03/2019 - 08:14
Display Headline
Correction: Subclinical hypothyroidism

In Azim S, Nasr C, “Subclinical hypothyroidism: When to treat,” Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(2):101–110, on page 103, in the section “Subclinical hypothyroidism can resolve or progress,” the sentence “The rate of progression to overt hypothyroidism is estimated to be 33% to 35% over 10 to 20 years of follow-up” contained an error. The correct rate of progression is 33% to 55%. This error has been corrected online.

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
392
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Azim S, Nasr C, “Subclinical hypothyroidism: When to treat,” Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(2):101–110, on page 103, in the section “Subclinical hypothyroidism can resolve or progress,” the sentence “The rate of progression to overt hypothyroidism is estimated to be 33% to 35% over 10 to 20 years of follow-up” contained an error. The correct rate of progression is 33% to 55%. This error has been corrected online.

In Azim S, Nasr C, “Subclinical hypothyroidism: When to treat,” Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(2):101–110, on page 103, in the section “Subclinical hypothyroidism can resolve or progress,” the sentence “The rate of progression to overt hypothyroidism is estimated to be 33% to 35% over 10 to 20 years of follow-up” contained an error. The correct rate of progression is 33% to 55%. This error has been corrected online.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(6)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(6)
Page Number
392
Page Number
392
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Subclinical hypothyroidism
Display Headline
Correction: Subclinical hypothyroidism
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 05/28/2019 - 14:30
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 05/28/2019 - 14:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 05/28/2019 - 14:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Correction: Hypertension guidelines

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 08:18
Display Headline
Correction: Hypertension guidelines

In Aleyadeh W, Hutt-Centeno E, Ahmed HM, Shah NP. Hypertension guidelines: treat patients, not numbers. Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(1):47–56. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18027, on page 50, the following statement was incorrect: “In 2017, the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recommended a relaxed systolic blood pressure target, ie, below 150 mm Hg, for adults over age 60, but a tighter goal of less than 130 mm Hg for the same age group if they have transient ischemic attack, stroke, or high cardiovascular risk.9” In fact, the ACP and AAFP recommended a tighter goal of less than 140 mm Hg for this higher-risk group. This has been corrected online.

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
210
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Aleyadeh W, Hutt-Centeno E, Ahmed HM, Shah NP. Hypertension guidelines: treat patients, not numbers. Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(1):47–56. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18027, on page 50, the following statement was incorrect: “In 2017, the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recommended a relaxed systolic blood pressure target, ie, below 150 mm Hg, for adults over age 60, but a tighter goal of less than 130 mm Hg for the same age group if they have transient ischemic attack, stroke, or high cardiovascular risk.9” In fact, the ACP and AAFP recommended a tighter goal of less than 140 mm Hg for this higher-risk group. This has been corrected online.

In Aleyadeh W, Hutt-Centeno E, Ahmed HM, Shah NP. Hypertension guidelines: treat patients, not numbers. Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(1):47–56. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18027, on page 50, the following statement was incorrect: “In 2017, the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recommended a relaxed systolic blood pressure target, ie, below 150 mm Hg, for adults over age 60, but a tighter goal of less than 130 mm Hg for the same age group if they have transient ischemic attack, stroke, or high cardiovascular risk.9” In fact, the ACP and AAFP recommended a tighter goal of less than 140 mm Hg for this higher-risk group. This has been corrected online.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(3)
Page Number
210
Page Number
210
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Hypertension guidelines
Display Headline
Correction: Hypertension guidelines
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Peer-reviewers for 2018

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 02/01/2019 - 06:50
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2018

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2018. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.   
Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(2)
Publications
Page Number
140
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2018. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.   
Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2018. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.   
Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 86(2)
Page Number
140
Page Number
140
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2018
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2018
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 01/28/2019 - 15:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 01/28/2019 - 15:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 01/28/2019 - 15:00
Article PDF Media

Correction: Men’s health 2018

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 11:12
Display Headline
Correction: Men’s health 2018

In the article by Chaitoff et al (Men’s health 2018: BPH, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, supplements. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(11):871–880, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.18011), the prostate-specific antigen level of a 60-year-old man was given as 5.1 mg/dL. The unit of measure should have been 5.1 ng/mL. This has been corrected online.

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
913
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In the article by Chaitoff et al (Men’s health 2018: BPH, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, supplements. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(11):871–880, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.18011), the prostate-specific antigen level of a 60-year-old man was given as 5.1 mg/dL. The unit of measure should have been 5.1 ng/mL. This has been corrected online.

In the article by Chaitoff et al (Men’s health 2018: BPH, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, supplements. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(11):871–880, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.18011), the prostate-specific antigen level of a 60-year-old man was given as 5.1 mg/dL. The unit of measure should have been 5.1 ng/mL. This has been corrected online.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(12)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(12)
Page Number
913
Page Number
913
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Men’s health 2018
Display Headline
Correction: Men’s health 2018
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 11/28/2018 - 11:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 11/28/2018 - 11:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 11/28/2018 - 11:45
Article PDF Media