Other Content

In the article by Agganis B, Lee D, Sepe T (Liver enzymes: No trivial elevations, even if asymptomatic. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(8):612–617, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17103), an error occurred on page 613, in the second paragraph in the section about alcohol intake. The words ALT and AST were reversed. The paragraph should read as follows:

The exact pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis is incompletely understood, but alcohol is primarily metabolized by the liver, and damage likely occurs during metabolism of the ingested alcohol. AST elevations tend to be higher than ALT elevations; the reason is ascribed to hepatic deficiency of pyridoxal 5´-phosphate, a cofactor of the enzymatic activity of ALT, which leads to a lesser increase in ALT than in AST.

We thank Avinash Alexander, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, for calling this to our attention. The correction has been made online.

In the article by Agganis B, Lee D, Sepe T (Liver enzymes: No trivial elevations, even if asymptomatic. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(8):612–617, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17103), an error occurred on page 613, in the second paragraph in the section about alcohol intake. The words ALT and AST were reversed. The paragraph should read as follows:

The exact pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis is incompletely understood, but alcohol is primarily metabolized by the liver, and damage likely occurs during metabolism of the ingested alcohol. AST elevations tend to be higher than ALT elevations; the reason is ascribed to hepatic deficiency of pyridoxal 5´-phosphate, a cofactor of the enzymatic activity of ALT, which leads to a lesser increase in ALT than in AST.

We thank Avinash Alexander, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, for calling this to our attention. The correction has been made online.

In the article by Agganis B, Lee D, Sepe T (Liver enzymes: No trivial elevations, even if asymptomatic. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(8):612–617, doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17103), an error occurred on page 613, in the second paragraph in the section about alcohol intake. The words ALT and AST were reversed. The paragraph should read as follows:

The exact pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis is incompletely understood, but alcohol is primarily metabolized by the liver, and damage likely occurs during metabolism of the ingested alcohol. AST elevations tend to be higher than ALT elevations; the reason is ascribed to hepatic deficiency of pyridoxal 5´-phosphate, a cofactor of the enzymatic activity of ALT, which leads to a lesser increase in ALT than in AST.

We thank Avinash Alexander, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, for calling this to our attention. The correction has been made online.

In the article “Gas under the right diaphragm” (Matsuura H, Hata H. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85[2]:98–100), Figure 2 appeared upside down. It should have appeared as follows:

This correction has been made to the online version.

In the article “Gas under the right diaphragm” (Matsuura H, Hata H. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85[2]:98–100), Figure 2 appeared upside down. It should have appeared as follows:

This correction has been made to the online version.

In the article “Gas under the right diaphragm” (Matsuura H, Hata H. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85[2]:98–100), Figure 2 appeared upside down. It should have appeared as follows:

This correction has been made to the online version.

On page 949 of the article “Diagnostic value of the physical examination in patients with dyspnea” (Shellenberger RA, Balakrishnan B, Avula S, Ebel A, Shaik S. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[12]:943–950), the terms “abdominojugular reflex” and “hepatojugular reflex” should have been “abdominojugular reflux” and “hepatojugular reflux.” This error also occurred in Table 5 on that page.

On page 949 of the article “Diagnostic value of the physical examination in patients with dyspnea” (Shellenberger RA, Balakrishnan B, Avula S, Ebel A, Shaik S. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[12]:943–950), the terms “abdominojugular reflex” and “hepatojugular reflex” should have been “abdominojugular reflux” and “hepatojugular reflux.” This error also occurred in Table 5 on that page.

On page 949 of the article “Diagnostic value of the physical examination in patients with dyspnea” (Shellenberger RA, Balakrishnan B, Avula S, Ebel A, Shaik S. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[12]:943–950), the terms “abdominojugular reflex” and “hepatojugular reflex” should have been “abdominojugular reflux” and “hepatojugular reflux.” This error also occurred in Table 5 on that page.

In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:

On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”

And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”

In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:

On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”

And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”

In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:

On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”

And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2017. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.

—Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2017. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.

—Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine in 2017. Reviewing papers for the Journal—both for specialty content and for relevance to our readership—is an arduous task that involves considerable time and effort. Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.

—Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief