Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/11/2022 - 15:31
Display Headline
Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE: A Survey of Clinician Perspectives

To the Editor:

In response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, iPLEDGE announced that they would accept results from home pregnancy tests and explicitly permit telemedicine.1 Given the financial and logistical burdens associated with iPLEDGE, these changes have the potential to increase access.2 However, it is unclear whether these modifications will be allowed to continue. We sought to evaluate clinician perspectives on the role of telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for iPLEDGE.

After piloting among several clinicians, a 13-question survey was distributed using the Qualtrics platform to members of the American Acne & Rosacea Society between April 14, 2021, and June 14, 2021. This survey consisted of items addressing provider practices and perspectives on telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for patients taking isotretinoin (eTable). Respondents were asked whether they think telemedicine and home pregnancy testing have improved access to care and whether they would like to continue these practices going forward. In addition, participants were asked about their concerns with home pregnancy testing and how comfortable they feel with home pregnancy testing for various contraceptive strategies (abstinence, condoms, combined oral contraceptives, and long-acting reversible contraception). This study was deemed exempt (category 2) by the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) institutional review board (Protocol #844549).

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Among 70 clinicians who completed the survey (response rate, 6.4%), 33 (47.1%) practiced in an academic setting. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians reported using telemedicine for a median of 90% (IQR=50%–100%) of their patients on isotretinoin, and 57 respondents (81.4%) reported having patients use a home pregnancy test for iPLEDGE (Table 1). More than 75% (55/70) agreed that they would like to continue to use telemedicine for patients on isotretinoin, and more than 75% (54/70) agreed that they would like to continue using home pregnancy testing for patients outside the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 75% (54/70) agreed that telemedicine has increased access for their patients, and more than 70% (52/70) agreed that home pregnancy testing has increased access (Table 2). Clinicians agreed that they would be comfortable using home pregnancy testing for patients choosing long-acting reversible contraception (63/70 [90.0%]), combined oral contraceptives (61/69 [88.4%]), condoms (47/70 [67.1%]), or abstinence (48/70 [68.6%])(Table 3).

Survey Respondent Characteristics

The most common concerns about home pregnancy testing were patient deception (39/70 [55.7%]), logistical challenges with reviewing results (19/70 [27.1%]), accuracy of the tests (19/70 [27.1%]), and patient ability to interpret tests appropriately (18/70 [25.7%]). To document testing results, 50 respondents (73.5%) would require a picture of results, 4 (5.9%) would accept a written report from the patient, and 14 (20.6%) would accept a verbal report from the patient (Table 2).

Survey Results on Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE

In this survey, clinicians expressed interest in continuing to use telemedicine and home pregnancy testing to care for patients with acne treated with isotretinoin. More than 75% agreed that these changes have increased access, which is notable, as several studies have identified that female and minority patients may face iPLEDGE-associated access barriers.3,4 Continuing to allow home pregnancy testing and explicitly permitting telemedicine can enable clinicians to provide patient-centered care.2

Clinician Comfort Level With Home Pregnancy Testing by Contraception Strategy

Although clinicians felt comfortable with a variety of contraceptive strategies, particularly those with high reported effectiveness,5 there were concerns about deception and interpretation of test results. Future studies are needed to identify optimal workflows for home pregnancy testing and whether patients should be required to provide a photograph of the results.

This survey study is limited by the possibility of sampling and response bias due to the low response rate. Although the use of national listservs was employed to maximize the generalizability of the results, given the response rate, future studies are needed to evaluate whether these findings generalize to other settings. In addition, given iPLEDGE-associated access barriers, further research is needed to examine how changes such as telemedicine and home pregnancy testing influence both access to isotretinoin and pregnancy prevention.

Acknowledgments—We would like to thank Stacey Moore (Montclair, New Jersey) and the American Acne & Rosacea Society for their help distributing the survey.

References
  1. Kane S, Admani S. COVID-19 pandemic leading to the accelerated development of a virtual health model for isotretinoin. J Dermatol Nurses Assoc. 2021;13:54-57.
  2. Barbieri JS, Frieden IJ, Nagler AR. Isotretinoin, patient safety, and patient-centered care-time to reform iPLEDGE. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:21-22.
  3. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity and sex with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319.
  4. Charrow A, Xia FD, Lu J, et al. Differences in isotretinoin start, interruption, and early termination across race and sex in the iPLEDGE era. PloS One. 2019;14:E0210445.
  5. Barbieri JS, Roe AH, Mostaghimi A. Simplifying contraception requirements for iPLEDGE: a decision analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:104-108.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Barbieri and Mostaghimi are from the Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Nagler is from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University, New York.

Drs. Barbieri and Nagler report no conflict of interest. Dr. Mostaghimi reports consulting fees from AbbVie; Bioniz Therapeutics Inc; Concert Pharma; Digital Diagnostics; Eli Lilly and Company; Hims & Hers Health, Inc; and Pfizer. He also reports equity in Hims & Hers Health, Inc, and Figure 1, as well as licensing fees from Concert Pharma and Pfizer outside of this work.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, Brigham Dermatology Associates, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (jbarbieri@bwh.harvard.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 110(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
37-40,E1-E2
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Barbieri and Mostaghimi are from the Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Nagler is from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University, New York.

Drs. Barbieri and Nagler report no conflict of interest. Dr. Mostaghimi reports consulting fees from AbbVie; Bioniz Therapeutics Inc; Concert Pharma; Digital Diagnostics; Eli Lilly and Company; Hims & Hers Health, Inc; and Pfizer. He also reports equity in Hims & Hers Health, Inc, and Figure 1, as well as licensing fees from Concert Pharma and Pfizer outside of this work.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, Brigham Dermatology Associates, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (jbarbieri@bwh.harvard.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Barbieri and Mostaghimi are from the Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Nagler is from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University, New York.

Drs. Barbieri and Nagler report no conflict of interest. Dr. Mostaghimi reports consulting fees from AbbVie; Bioniz Therapeutics Inc; Concert Pharma; Digital Diagnostics; Eli Lilly and Company; Hims & Hers Health, Inc; and Pfizer. He also reports equity in Hims & Hers Health, Inc, and Figure 1, as well as licensing fees from Concert Pharma and Pfizer outside of this work.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, Brigham Dermatology Associates, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (jbarbieri@bwh.harvard.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

In response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, iPLEDGE announced that they would accept results from home pregnancy tests and explicitly permit telemedicine.1 Given the financial and logistical burdens associated with iPLEDGE, these changes have the potential to increase access.2 However, it is unclear whether these modifications will be allowed to continue. We sought to evaluate clinician perspectives on the role of telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for iPLEDGE.

After piloting among several clinicians, a 13-question survey was distributed using the Qualtrics platform to members of the American Acne & Rosacea Society between April 14, 2021, and June 14, 2021. This survey consisted of items addressing provider practices and perspectives on telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for patients taking isotretinoin (eTable). Respondents were asked whether they think telemedicine and home pregnancy testing have improved access to care and whether they would like to continue these practices going forward. In addition, participants were asked about their concerns with home pregnancy testing and how comfortable they feel with home pregnancy testing for various contraceptive strategies (abstinence, condoms, combined oral contraceptives, and long-acting reversible contraception). This study was deemed exempt (category 2) by the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) institutional review board (Protocol #844549).

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Among 70 clinicians who completed the survey (response rate, 6.4%), 33 (47.1%) practiced in an academic setting. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians reported using telemedicine for a median of 90% (IQR=50%–100%) of their patients on isotretinoin, and 57 respondents (81.4%) reported having patients use a home pregnancy test for iPLEDGE (Table 1). More than 75% (55/70) agreed that they would like to continue to use telemedicine for patients on isotretinoin, and more than 75% (54/70) agreed that they would like to continue using home pregnancy testing for patients outside the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 75% (54/70) agreed that telemedicine has increased access for their patients, and more than 70% (52/70) agreed that home pregnancy testing has increased access (Table 2). Clinicians agreed that they would be comfortable using home pregnancy testing for patients choosing long-acting reversible contraception (63/70 [90.0%]), combined oral contraceptives (61/69 [88.4%]), condoms (47/70 [67.1%]), or abstinence (48/70 [68.6%])(Table 3).

Survey Respondent Characteristics

The most common concerns about home pregnancy testing were patient deception (39/70 [55.7%]), logistical challenges with reviewing results (19/70 [27.1%]), accuracy of the tests (19/70 [27.1%]), and patient ability to interpret tests appropriately (18/70 [25.7%]). To document testing results, 50 respondents (73.5%) would require a picture of results, 4 (5.9%) would accept a written report from the patient, and 14 (20.6%) would accept a verbal report from the patient (Table 2).

Survey Results on Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE

In this survey, clinicians expressed interest in continuing to use telemedicine and home pregnancy testing to care for patients with acne treated with isotretinoin. More than 75% agreed that these changes have increased access, which is notable, as several studies have identified that female and minority patients may face iPLEDGE-associated access barriers.3,4 Continuing to allow home pregnancy testing and explicitly permitting telemedicine can enable clinicians to provide patient-centered care.2

Clinician Comfort Level With Home Pregnancy Testing by Contraception Strategy

Although clinicians felt comfortable with a variety of contraceptive strategies, particularly those with high reported effectiveness,5 there were concerns about deception and interpretation of test results. Future studies are needed to identify optimal workflows for home pregnancy testing and whether patients should be required to provide a photograph of the results.

This survey study is limited by the possibility of sampling and response bias due to the low response rate. Although the use of national listservs was employed to maximize the generalizability of the results, given the response rate, future studies are needed to evaluate whether these findings generalize to other settings. In addition, given iPLEDGE-associated access barriers, further research is needed to examine how changes such as telemedicine and home pregnancy testing influence both access to isotretinoin and pregnancy prevention.

Acknowledgments—We would like to thank Stacey Moore (Montclair, New Jersey) and the American Acne & Rosacea Society for their help distributing the survey.

To the Editor:

In response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, iPLEDGE announced that they would accept results from home pregnancy tests and explicitly permit telemedicine.1 Given the financial and logistical burdens associated with iPLEDGE, these changes have the potential to increase access.2 However, it is unclear whether these modifications will be allowed to continue. We sought to evaluate clinician perspectives on the role of telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for iPLEDGE.

After piloting among several clinicians, a 13-question survey was distributed using the Qualtrics platform to members of the American Acne & Rosacea Society between April 14, 2021, and June 14, 2021. This survey consisted of items addressing provider practices and perspectives on telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for patients taking isotretinoin (eTable). Respondents were asked whether they think telemedicine and home pregnancy testing have improved access to care and whether they would like to continue these practices going forward. In addition, participants were asked about their concerns with home pregnancy testing and how comfortable they feel with home pregnancy testing for various contraceptive strategies (abstinence, condoms, combined oral contraceptives, and long-acting reversible contraception). This study was deemed exempt (category 2) by the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) institutional review board (Protocol #844549).

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Survey Distributed to Clinicians

Among 70 clinicians who completed the survey (response rate, 6.4%), 33 (47.1%) practiced in an academic setting. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians reported using telemedicine for a median of 90% (IQR=50%–100%) of their patients on isotretinoin, and 57 respondents (81.4%) reported having patients use a home pregnancy test for iPLEDGE (Table 1). More than 75% (55/70) agreed that they would like to continue to use telemedicine for patients on isotretinoin, and more than 75% (54/70) agreed that they would like to continue using home pregnancy testing for patients outside the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 75% (54/70) agreed that telemedicine has increased access for their patients, and more than 70% (52/70) agreed that home pregnancy testing has increased access (Table 2). Clinicians agreed that they would be comfortable using home pregnancy testing for patients choosing long-acting reversible contraception (63/70 [90.0%]), combined oral contraceptives (61/69 [88.4%]), condoms (47/70 [67.1%]), or abstinence (48/70 [68.6%])(Table 3).

Survey Respondent Characteristics

The most common concerns about home pregnancy testing were patient deception (39/70 [55.7%]), logistical challenges with reviewing results (19/70 [27.1%]), accuracy of the tests (19/70 [27.1%]), and patient ability to interpret tests appropriately (18/70 [25.7%]). To document testing results, 50 respondents (73.5%) would require a picture of results, 4 (5.9%) would accept a written report from the patient, and 14 (20.6%) would accept a verbal report from the patient (Table 2).

Survey Results on Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE

In this survey, clinicians expressed interest in continuing to use telemedicine and home pregnancy testing to care for patients with acne treated with isotretinoin. More than 75% agreed that these changes have increased access, which is notable, as several studies have identified that female and minority patients may face iPLEDGE-associated access barriers.3,4 Continuing to allow home pregnancy testing and explicitly permitting telemedicine can enable clinicians to provide patient-centered care.2

Clinician Comfort Level With Home Pregnancy Testing by Contraception Strategy

Although clinicians felt comfortable with a variety of contraceptive strategies, particularly those with high reported effectiveness,5 there were concerns about deception and interpretation of test results. Future studies are needed to identify optimal workflows for home pregnancy testing and whether patients should be required to provide a photograph of the results.

This survey study is limited by the possibility of sampling and response bias due to the low response rate. Although the use of national listservs was employed to maximize the generalizability of the results, given the response rate, future studies are needed to evaluate whether these findings generalize to other settings. In addition, given iPLEDGE-associated access barriers, further research is needed to examine how changes such as telemedicine and home pregnancy testing influence both access to isotretinoin and pregnancy prevention.

Acknowledgments—We would like to thank Stacey Moore (Montclair, New Jersey) and the American Acne & Rosacea Society for their help distributing the survey.

References
  1. Kane S, Admani S. COVID-19 pandemic leading to the accelerated development of a virtual health model for isotretinoin. J Dermatol Nurses Assoc. 2021;13:54-57.
  2. Barbieri JS, Frieden IJ, Nagler AR. Isotretinoin, patient safety, and patient-centered care-time to reform iPLEDGE. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:21-22.
  3. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity and sex with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319.
  4. Charrow A, Xia FD, Lu J, et al. Differences in isotretinoin start, interruption, and early termination across race and sex in the iPLEDGE era. PloS One. 2019;14:E0210445.
  5. Barbieri JS, Roe AH, Mostaghimi A. Simplifying contraception requirements for iPLEDGE: a decision analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:104-108.
References
  1. Kane S, Admani S. COVID-19 pandemic leading to the accelerated development of a virtual health model for isotretinoin. J Dermatol Nurses Assoc. 2021;13:54-57.
  2. Barbieri JS, Frieden IJ, Nagler AR. Isotretinoin, patient safety, and patient-centered care-time to reform iPLEDGE. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:21-22.
  3. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity and sex with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319.
  4. Charrow A, Xia FD, Lu J, et al. Differences in isotretinoin start, interruption, and early termination across race and sex in the iPLEDGE era. PloS One. 2019;14:E0210445.
  5. Barbieri JS, Roe AH, Mostaghimi A. Simplifying contraception requirements for iPLEDGE: a decision analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:104-108.
Issue
Cutis - 110(1)
Issue
Cutis - 110(1)
Page Number
37-40,E1-E2
Page Number
37-40,E1-E2
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE: A Survey of Clinician Perspectives
Display Headline
Telemedicine and Home Pregnancy Testing for iPLEDGE: A Survey of Clinician Perspectives
Sections
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • The majority of clinicians report that the use of telemedicine and home pregnancy testing for iPLEDGE has improved access to care and that they would like to continue these practices.
  • Continuing to allow home pregnancy testing and explicitly permitting telemedicine can enable clinicians to provide patient-centered care for patients treated with isotretinoin.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media