Affiliations
Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
Department of Medicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Given name(s)
Kavitha K.
Family name
Prabaker
Degrees
MD

Vancomycin Troughs and Nephrotoxicity

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/22/2017 - 19:44
Display Headline
Elevated vancomycin trough is not associated with nephrotoxicity among inpatient veterans

Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of invasive infections and, in the United States, may now be responsible for more deaths than disease associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).1, 2 Vancomycin remains the drug of choice for invasive MRSA disease; from 1984 to 1996, its use in the United States escalated 6‐fold.3 With increased use of vancomycin, MRSA strains with partial and full resistance to vancomycin have emerged. Since 1997, S. aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin (VISA) as well as heteroresistance to vancomycin (hVISA) have been described.46 Several centers have also noted a slow rise in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) among clinical MRSA isolates (MIC creep).7 Low vancomycin trough levels have been implicated in the emergence of hVISA, and several studies have demonstrated a higher rate of vancomycin treatment failure, longer duration of fever, and prolonged hospitalization with hVISA and strains with elevated MIC compared to vancomycin‐susceptible MRSA.812 Until recently, vancomycin was frequently dosed to target trough levels <10 mg/L. The above concerns, combined with pharmacodynamic data suggesting that maintaining a ratio of vancomycin area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) 400 may be associated with improved clinical outcome,13 have prompted an expert consensus to recommend targeting higher vancomycin trough levels (typically 15‐20 mg/L) for invasive MRSA infections and general avoidance of trough levels <10 mg/L.14

The effect of higher trough levels on kidney function remains poorly understood, as does the mechanism of vancomycin‐induced renal injury itself, though animal studies demonstrate oxidative damage to renal tubules with high doses of vancomycin.15, 16 In previous studies, the incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity with lower troughs has been reported to range from 0% to 19% with vancomycin alone, increasing up to 35% with concomitant aminoglycoside therapy.1724 Limited studies have been done to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity at higher trough levels. Lodise and colleagues identified high‐dose vancomycin (>4 gm per day) as an independent risk factor for nephrotoxicity, when compared to administration of <4 gm of vancomycin per day or use of linezolid, and showed greater risk of nephrotoxicity with increasing vancomycin trough levels within the first 96 hours of vancomycin administration.25, 26 Hidayat et al. demonstrated, in a prospective cohort analysis, that patients with mean trough levels 15 mg/L had a significantly increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. In that study, patients who developed nephrotoxicity were more likely to receive other nephrotoxic agents, and troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were not distinguished.9 This is an important distinction, as vancomycin is frequently continued with dose adjustment even after nephrotoxicity occurs, with the nephrotoxicity resulting in subsequent higher troughs. Jeffres et al. demonstrated that maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L was associated with nephrotoxicity in patients with healthcare‐associated MRSA pneumonia; this study was retrospective and focused on a particularly ill patient population.27 Pritchard et al. also retrospectively reviewed 2493 courses of vancomycin at their institution, from 2003 to 2007, and found a significant relationship between vancomycin trough 14 mg/L and nephrotoxicity. The presence of comorbid disease states and concomitant nephrotoxins was determined in a subset of 130 courses in 2007; increasing vancomycin trough was associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariable analysis.28 However, it is not clear whether troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were distinguished in this study. At least 6 other retrospective studies involving small sample size or published in abstract form have widely different results in relating high vancomycin trough or aggressive vancomycin dosing strategies to nephrotoxicity.2934

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between development of nephrotoxicity and trough levels obtained during vancomycin therapy at a large veterans' hospital, while accounting for other potential nephrotoxins, and to evaluate the temporal association between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity. We chose to focus on nephrotoxicity that occurred on, or after, 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce other confounding factors of nephrotoxicity, since short durations of vancomycin frequently represent use in surgical prophylaxis or empirical therapy for hemodynamically unstable patients at high risk for renal injury.

Patients and Methods

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System during 2 time periods (May 1, 2005‐April 30, 2006 and Jan 1, 2007‐Dec 31, 2007) when hospital guidelines recommended different vancomycin dosing regimens based on indication. During the first time period, the recommended target trough level was 10 mg/L, regardless of indication. In May 2006, target troughs were changed according to the following institutional guidelines: 8‐12 mg/L for cellulitis, urinary tract infection (UTI), and uncomplicated bacteremia; 10‐15 mg/L for endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and visceral abscesses; and 15‐20 mg/L for bacterial meningitis and pneumonia. The vancomycin manufacturers (American Pharmaceutical Partners (Schaumburg, IL) and Baxter (Deerfield, IL)) were the same during both time periods. Patient data was collected from the VA Computerized Patient Records System (CPRS) by 2 trained reviewers (K.K.P. and T.P.). All inpatients who received 5 days of intravenous vancomycin therapy during these time periods were identified via electronic pharmacy records. We then excluded all patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/L prior to starting vancomycin, no serum creatinine collected before or during receipt of vancomycin, no trough levels drawn while on vancomycin (or for patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, no trough levels drawn prior to nephrotoxicity onset), nephrotoxicity occurring before day 5 of vancomycin therapy, and receipt of concomitant amphotericin B.

Data Collection and Study Definitions

In patients who received multiple courses of vancomycin during the specified time period, only the first course starting on, or after, May 1, 2005 and lasting 5 days was analyzed. Data collected for each patient included age, sex, race, and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, liver dysfunction, and active malignancy). Diabetes mellitus was defined as 2 fasting blood glucose levels >125, or receipt of insulin or other hypoglycemic medications during vancomycin treatment. Patients were considered to have liver disease if they had a prior diagnosis of cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatic insufficiency, or if 2 of the following criteria were met: total bilirubin >2 mg/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 the upper limit of normal, or serum albumin <3 g/dL. Receipt of 1 dose of potentially nephrotoxic agents, including aminoglycosides, intravenous furosemide, intravenous trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, intravenous contrast dye, potentially nephrotoxic chemotherapy, and vasopressors, were recorded beginning 72 hours prior to vancomycin therapy until onset of nephrotoxicity, or, if nephrotoxicity did not occur, the final vancomycin dose. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE‐I) and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin were considered potentially nephrotoxic if they were newly started within 72 hours of vancomycin.

For each patient, the serum creatinine was recorded upon admission, within 24 hours of starting vancomycin, during vancomycin treatment, and at 24 hours and 72 hours following the final vancomycin dose. Serum creatinine was typically measured daily. Per institutional protocol, vancomycin trough levels were drawn 30‐60 minutes prior to the fourth dose, and again in 5‐7 days or with any large change in renal function. Extrapolated troughs were calculated by a pharmacist if levels were drawn outside of the 60‐minute time period. The highest trough and duration of therapy was documented for each patient. The mean trough was equal to the arithmetic mean of all troughs obtained during vancomycin administration until 72 hours following the final dose.

Outcome Analysis

The primary end point was the development of nephrotoxicity, which was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either 0.5 mg/dL or 50% for at least 2 consecutive days after receipt of vancomycin, up to 72 hours after the final dose, compared to the last creatinine measured prior to vancomycin initiation. Patients who had a documented isolated increase in serum creatinine that resolved upon recheck within 24 hours were not classified as experiencing nephrotoxicity. In patients who developed nephrotoxicity, mean troughs, maximum troughs, duration of vancomycin treatment, and receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins were ascertained using data collected only before nephrotoxicity onset. Bivariate and multivariate models were subsequently constructed in order to determine risk factors for nephrotoxicity, using either mean or maximum trough achieved prior to nephrotoxicity for each patient.

Statistical Methods

Comparisons between the 2005‐2006 and 2007 groups were made using Student t test for continuous variables, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. Association of clinical variables with nephrotoxicity was assessed using bivariate logistic regression with subsequent multivariable logistic regression. We initially decided to use maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L as the vancomycin exposure variable of interest to include in multivariable models, as we felt that (1) trough 15 mg/L is clinically relevant given current guidelines that recommend aiming for trough 15 mg/L for treatment of most invasive staphylococcal disease,31 and (2) prior studies identified a single trough 15 mg/L as a possible risk factor for nephrotoxicity.9, 27, 29, 31 However, we also generated other multivariable models that included either maximum vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, mean vancomycin trough 15 mg/L, or mean vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, and models in which maximum and mean vancomycin troughs were treated as continuous variables. All variables were initially included in multivariable models; nonsignificant variables were removed from the models in a backwards stepwise fashion until likelihood ratio testing determined that removal of any variable was associated with likelihood ratio test P value <0.20 in comparing the full to reduced model. All calculated P values are two‐sided. All calculations were performed with STATA, version 10 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). This study was approved via expedited review by the Institutional Review Board of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

Results

Comparison of 2005‐2006 Versus 2007 Cohorts

Of the 705 patients who were identified by pharmacy records to have received intravenous vancomycin, 348 patients remained after exclusion criteria were applied; the vast majority of patients were excluded because they received <5 days of vancomycin therapy. Of the 348 patients included in the study, 201 received vancomycin in 2005‐2006, and 147 received vancomycin in 2007 (Table 1). Mean vancomycin trough was significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006 (average mean trough 13.2 mg/L 4.3 vs 9.7 mg/L 3.6; P < 0.0001), although median (8 vs 9 days) and mean (11.2 vs 12.2 days) duration of therapy was 1 day shorter in 2007 versus 2005‐2006. Age, sex, race, comorbidities, and indication for vancomycin use were similar between the 2 groups. The receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins was largely similar between the 2 time periods, with the primary exception being that a higher proportion of patients received intravenous contrast dye in 2007 (19%) than in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) (P = 0.003), and a lower proportion of patients received amikacin in 2007 (7.5%) than in 2005‐2006 (15%) (P = 0.043), though overall receipt of aminoglycosides was similar. Overall, nephrotoxicity was noted in 31 patients (8.9%), with similar incidence in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) and 2007 (10.2%) (P = 0.57). The median time to onset of nephrotoxicity was 7 days, with a median peak serum creatinine of 1.8 mg/dL.

Characteristics of Patients Treated With Vancomycin From May 2005 Through April 2006 and From January to December 2007
 2005‐2006 (n = 201)2007 (n = 147)P Value*Combined (n = 348)
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; IV, intravenous; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug.

  • Comparison of continuous variables done by Student t test, ordinal variables by Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and nominal variables by Fisher's exact test.

  • Osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection, endocarditis, meningitis, otomastoiditis, empiric therapy.

Patient characteristics    
Age (median years)59610.1860
Male gender (no. of patients)198 (99%)141 (96%)0.18339 (97.4%)
Race (no. of patients):    
White128 (63.7%)95 (64.6%)0.91223 (64.1%)
Black57 (28.4%)40 (27.2%)0.9097 (27.9%)
Other race16 (8%)12 (8.2%)1.0028 (8%)
Comorbidities (no. of patients):    
Diabetes75 (37.3%)50 (34%)0.57125 (35.9%)
Liver disease29 (14.4%)14 (9.5%)0.1943 (12.4%)
Malignancy33 (16.4%)21 (14.3%)0.6554 (15.5%)
Concomitant nephrotoxins (no. of patients):    
Aminoglycosides (any):41 (20.4%)25 (17.0%)0.4966 (19.0%)
Gentamicin11 (5.5%)14 (9.5%)0.2125 (7.2%)
Amikacin30 (14.9%)11 (7.5%)0.04341 (11.8%)
IV Furosemide53 (26.4%)34 (23.1%)0.5387 (25.0%)
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)20 (10%)10 (6.8%)0.3430 (8.6%)
NSAID (newly started)26 (12.9%)11 (7.5%)0.1237 (10.6%)
IV Trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole3 (1.5%)2 (1.4%)1.005 (1.4%)
Contrast dye16 (8%)28 (19.0%)0.00344 (12.6%)
Chemotherapy3 (1.5%)4 (2.7%)0.427 (2%)
Vasopressors (any):13 (6.5%)7 (4.8%)0.6420 (5.7%)
Dopamine4 (2%)1 (0.7%)0.405 (1.4%)
Epinephrine5 (2.5%)1 (0.7%)0.416 (1.7%)
Norepinephrine9 (4.5%)5 (3.4%)0.7814 (4.0%)
Phenylephrine2 (1.0%)1 (0.7%)1.003 (0.9%)
Vasopressin0 (0%)1 (0.7%)0.421 (0.3%)
Indication for vancomycin:    
Skin/soft tissue/bone infection112 (55.7%)77 (52.4%)0.59189 (54.3%)
Pneumonia26 (12.9%)26 (17.7%)0.2352 (14.9%)
Bacteremia26 (12.9%)14 (9.5%)0.4040 (11.5%)
Other37 (18.4%)30 (20.4%)0.6867 (19.3%)
Clinical outcomes    
Nephrotoxicity (no. of patients)16 (8%)15 (10.2%)0.5731 (8.9%)
Mean admission creatinine (mg/L)1.101.160.251.13
Mean vancomycin trough (mg/L)9.7113.2<0.000111.2
Mean highest vancomycin trough (mg/L)11.815.7<0.000113.5
Vancomycin duration (median days)980.0148

Determination of Clinical Factors for Nephrotoxicity

Results of bivariate and multivariate analysis of clinical factors potentially associated with nephrotoxicity are displayed in Table 2. Among the 31 patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, the mean maximum vancomycin trough prior to nephrotoxicity onset was 14.9 mg/L, compared to 13.3 mg/L among those not experiencing nephrotoxicity (OR 1.03 for each 1 mg/L increment in mean trough, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98‐1.09; P = 0.21). While there was a trend toward patients with nephrotoxicity having a maximum trough 15 mg/L, it was not significant in either bivariate (OR 2.18, 95% CI 0.85‐5.63; P = 0.11) or multivariate (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.91‐4.61; P = 0.082) analysis. The duration of vancomycin therapy was also not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, both when evaluated as a continuous variable and when prolonged courses (14 days) were compared to short courses (between 5 and 14 days) of therapy. Other multivariable models were constructed that included maximum trough 20 mg/L, mean trough 15 mg/L, mean trough 20 mg/L, and maximum and mean trough as continuous variables; in all of these models, the vancomycin exposure variable of interest was not significant enough to remain in the final model after backwards elimination. The only factor significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in either bivariate or multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.52‐8.68; P = 0.004 in multivariate analysis).

Association of Clinical Factors With Nephrotoxicity
Clinical FactorNT (n = 31)No NT (n = 317)Bivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Odds RatioP ValueOdds RatioP Value
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; NT, nephrotoxicity; TMP‐SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; SCr, serum creatinine.

  • Odds ratio per 1 mg/L increase in trough level.

  • Odds ratio per 1 additional day of vancomycin therapy.

Patient demographics      
Age (median)64 yr60 yr1.010.48  
Male sex31308N/A1.00  
Race:      
White172061.0 (reference)   
Black10871.390.43  
Other4242.020.24  
Vancomycin characteristics      
Mean trough (mg/L), mean per group:12.111.11.05*0.19  
Patients with mean trough <10 mg/L91401.0 (reference)   
Patients with mean trough 10‐15 mg/L151301.790.18  
Patients with mean trough 15 mg/L7472.320.11  
Highest trough (mg/L), mean per group14.913.31.03*0.21  
Patients with highest trough <10 mg/L71071.0 (reference)   
Patients with highest trough 10‐15 mg/L101121.360.54  
Patients with highest trough 15 mg/L14982.180.112.050.082
Days of vancomycin therapy (median)780.970.400.960.17
14 days of vancomycin therapy7711.010.98  
Clinical characteristics      
SCr >1 mg/L prior to vancomycin111360.730.43  
Diabetes101150.840.66  
Liver disease3400.740.64  
Malignancy5491.050.92  
Concomitant nephrotoxins (any):211741.730.17  
Aminoglycosides (any):7591.280.59  
Amikacin3380.790.70  
Gentamicin4212.090.21  
Furosemide (intravenous)10771.480.33  
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)1290.330.290.310.27
NSAIDs (newly started)2350.560.44  
TMP‐SMX (intravenous)237.220.034  
Contrast dye (intravenous)10343.960.0014.010.001
Chemotherapy161.730.62  
Vasopressors (any):1190.520.53  
Dopamine0501.0  
Epinephrine0601.0  
Norepinephrine1130.780.81  
Phenylephrine0301.0  
Vasopressin0101.0  

Reversibility of Nephrotoxicity

Of the 31 patients with nephrotoxicity, 20 (64.5%) patients still met criteria for nephrotoxicity at the time of vancomycin discontinuation. Nephrotoxicity subsequently resolved in 10 of the 16 patients that were still nephrotoxic at the time of vancomycin discontinuation (4 patients did not have follow‐up creatinine checked within 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation). Thus, overall reversibility of nephrotoxicity either prior to, or within, 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation was 77.8% (21/27 patients). Of the 6 patients who remained persistently nephrotoxic at 72 hours, all had received concomitant nephrotoxins prior to the onset of nephrotoxicity, as compared to 15/21 (71.4%) patients whose nephrotoxicity resolved (P = 0.28 by Fisher's exact test). Only 1 persistently nephrotoxic patient required dialysis: a critically ill patient with multiorgan failure for whom care was withdrawn within 4 days of vancomycin discontinuation.

DISCUSSION

Over the past 5 years, many institutions have adopted higher dosing guidelines for vancomycin, based on pharmacokinetic concerns related to its performance in the treatment of invasive staphylococcal disease. The data on nephrotoxicity at these higher troughs are limited. Previous studies that address the relationship between higher vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity suffer from small sample size29, 33; do not address reversibility of nephrotoxicity9, 26, 2931, 33; may not account for the temporal relationship between the development of nephrotoxicity and high trough levels,9, 2831 or examine patient populations at relatively high27 or low30 risk for renal injury apart from receipt of vancomycin. A recent expert consensus statement identified these factors as limiting the strength of evidence for a direct causal relationship between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity.14 A recent review by Hazlewood et al. concluded that the incidence of nephrotoxicity remains low in patients without preexisting renal disease and those not receiving concomitant nephrotoxins.35 The aim of our study was to identify whether or not there was a correlation between high‐dose vancomycin and nephrotoxicity, while accounting for their temporal relationship, concomitant nephrotoxin use, and reversibility. In particular, we chose to focus on nephrotoxicity occurring after at least 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce confounding by other possible sources of renal injury that may have affected the decision to initially prescribe vancomycin, an approach advocated by a recent review.36 While we noted that mean and maximum vancomycin troughs were significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006, incidence of nephrotoxicity was stable between the 2 time periods, with the higher rate of intravenous contrast dye in 2007 balanced in part by less aminoglycoside use. Overall, higher trough levels were not necessarily accompanied by a significant increase in nephrotoxicity, though there was a nonsignificant trend toward more nephrotoxic patients having maximum trough 15 mg/L.

The only clinical factor that was significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye. Of the 44 patients who received intravenous contrast dye, 10 (22.7%) experienced nephrotoxicity. Interestingly, in animal studies, both intravenous contrast dye37, 38 and high‐dose vancomycin15, 16 have been demonstrated to promote free radical formation within renal tissue, which is hypothesized to cause tubular damage primarily through vascular endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and subsequent reperfusion injury. N‐acetylcysteine is frequently administered to patients about to receive intravenous contrast dye (although its benefit remains controversial37, 39); N‐acetylcysteine has also been shown in an animal model to attenuate vancomycin‐induced renal injury.40

Receipt of concomitant aminoglycosides was not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, in contrast with previous studies. One meta‐analysis of 8 studies revealed found that the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with combination vancomycin and aminoglycosides was 13.3% greater than with vancomycin alone (P < 0.01) and 4.3% greater than therapy with an aminoglycoside alone (P < 0.05)20; another analysis of safety data of the clinical trial comparing daptomycin to comparator therapy including initial low‐dose gentamicin therapy in the treatment of S. aureus bacteremia found renal adverse events in 10 of 53 (19%) patients receiving vancomycin and gentamicin, compared to 8 of 120 (7%) patients receiving daptomycin.41 While our findings that show no clear relationship between concomitant vancomycin and aminoglycoside use and nephrotoxicity may have been due to the relatively small number of patients in our study who received aminoglycosides, it is worth noting that more patients in our study received aminoglycosides than intravenous contrast dye (66 vs 44 patients). The 77.8% overall resolution of nephrotoxicity observed in our study is similar to that reported by Farber and Moellering in 198319 and to that reported more recently with high‐dose vancomycin by Jeffres et al. and Teng et al.27, 34

Although we attempted to account for as many confounders as possible, the retrospective nature of our study prevents us from making definitive statements regarding the role of vancomycin trough levels and nephrotoxicity. In particular, we are unable to comment on any potential role vancomycin may have on nephrotoxicity within 5 days of its start or on patients with a baseline serum creatinine >2. Other significant limitations include our small proportion of female patients, and that we were not able to calculate severity of illness or determine the presence of congestive heart failure. Also, we may be dosing vancomycin less aggressively than other centers, and thus may have reduced power in determining whether higher troughs, particularly those 20 mg/L, are associated with nephrotoxicity; identification of more patients with higher troughs and a larger overall sample size may have yielded different results. Even in the 2007 group, a significant number of patients with cellulitis, UTI, and uncomplicated bacteremia had target troughs of 8‐12 mg/L. However, taken together, our findings do not support a definite relationship between vancomycin troughs and development of nephrotoxicity, and that when it does occur, it is largely reversible. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate the effects of aggressive vancomycin dosing regimens on nephrotoxicity, particularly those regimens that include large loading doses. Trials of antioxidative agents in patients receiving aggressive dosing regimens of vancomycin who require radiology studies involving intravenous contrast dye may be indicated as well.

Files
References
  1. Bancroft EA.Antimicrobial resistance: it's not just for hospitals.JAMA.2007;298:18031804.
  2. Klevens RM,Morrison MA,Nadle J, et al.Invasive methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States.JAMA.2007;298:17631771.
  3. Kirst HA,Thompson DG,Nicas TI.Historical yearly usage of vancomycin.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1998;42:13031304.
  4. Hiramatsu K,Aritaka N,Hanaki H, et al.Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.Lancet.1997;350:16701673.
  5. Hiramatsu K,Hanaki H,Ino T,Yabuta K,Oguri T,Tenover FC.Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.J Antimicrob Chemother.1997;40:135136.
  6. Liu C,Chambers HF.Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2003;47:30403045.
  7. Steinkraus G,White R,Friedrich L.Vancomycin MIC creep in non‐vancomycin‐intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin‐susceptible clinical methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05.J Antimicrob Chemother.2007;60:788794.
  8. Charles PG,Ward PB,Johnson PD,Howden BP,Grayson ML.Clinical features associated with bacteremia due to heterogeneous vancomycin‐ intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:448451.
  9. Hidayat LK,Hsu DI,Quist R,Shriner KA,Wong‐Beringer A.High‐dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity.Arch Intern Med.2006;166:21382144.
  10. Moise‐Broder PA,Sakoulas G,Eliopoulos GM,Schentag JJ,Forrest A,Moellering RC.Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:17001705.
  11. Sakoulas G,Moise‐Broder PA,Schentag J,Forrest A,Moellering RC,Eliopoulos GM.Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.J Clin Microbiol.2004;42:23982402.
  12. Tenover FC,Moellering RC.The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2007;44:12081215.
  13. Moise‐Broder PA,Forrest A,Birmingham MC,Schentag JJ.Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.Clin Pharmacokinet.2004;43:925942.
  14. Rybak M,Lomaestro B,Rotschafer JC, et al.Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.Am J Health Syst Pharm.2009;66:8298.
  15. Dieterich C,Puey A,Lin S, et al.Gene expression analysis reveals new possible mechanisms of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity and identifies gene markers candidates.Toxicol Sci.2009;107:258269.
  16. Oktem F,Arslan MK,Ozguner F, et al.In vivo evidences suggesting the role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity: protection by erdosteine.Toxicology.2005;215:227233.
  17. Cimino MA,Rotstein C,Slaughter RL,Emrich LJ.Relationship of serum antibiotic concentrations to nephrotoxicity in cancer patients receiving concurrent aminoglycoside and vancomycin therapy.Am J Med.1987;83:10911097.
  18. Downs NJ,Neihart RE,Dolezal JM,Hodges GR.Mild nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin use.Arch Intern Med.1989;149:17771781.
  19. Farber BF,Moellering RC.Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1983;23:138141.
  20. Goetz MB,Sayers J.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin and aminoglycoside therapy separately and in combination.J Antimicrob Chemother.1993;32:325334.
  21. Mellor JA,Kingdom J,Cafferkey M,Keane CT.Vancomycin toxicity: a prospective study.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;15:773780.
  22. Pauly DJ,Musa DM,Lestico MR,Lindstrom MJ,Hetsko CM.Risk of nephrotoxicity with combination vancomycin‐aminoglycoside antibiotic therapy.Pharmacotherapy.1990;10:378382.
  23. Rybak MJ,Albrecht LM,Boike SC,Chandrasekar PH.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin, alone and with an aminoglycoside.J Antimicrob Chemother.1990;25:679687.
  24. Sorrell TC,Collignon PJ.A prospective study of adverse reactions associated with vancomycin therapy.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;16:235241.
  25. Lodise TP,Lomaestro B,Graves J,Drusano GL.Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2008;52:13301336.
  26. Lodise TP,Patel N,Lomaestro BM,Rodvold KA,Drusano GL.Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration‐time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients.Clin Infect Dis.2009;49:507514.
  27. Jeffres MN,Isakow W,Doherty JA,Micek ST,Kollef MH.A retrospective analysis of possible renal toxicity associated with vancomycin in patients with health care‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.Clin Ther.2007;29:11071115.
  28. Pritchard L,Baker C,Leggett J,Sehdev P,Brown A,Bayley KB.Increasing vancomycin serum trough concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity.Am J Med.2010;123:11431149.
  29. Lee‐Such SC,Overholser BR,Munoz‐Price LS. Nephrotoxicity associated with aggressive vancomycin therapy [abstract L‐1298]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2006. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  30. Mora A,Dzintars D,Lat A,Frei CR,Echevarria K. Incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in the absence of concomitant nephrotoxins or confounders [abstract A1–1294b]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  31. Nguyen M,Wong J,Lee C, et al. Nephrotoxicity associated with high‐dose versus standard‐dose vancomycin therapy [abstract K‐1096]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2007. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  32. Rios E,Pounders CL,Allison T. Evaluation of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in patients with methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia [abstract A1–1294a]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  33. Zimmerman AE,Katona BG,Plaisance KI.Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with outcomes in patients with gram‐positive bacteremia.Pharmacotherapy.1995;15:8591.
  34. Teng CG,Rezai K,Itokazu GS, et al. Continuation of high dose vancomycin despite nephrotoxicity [abstract K‐3486]. In:Abstracts of the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/46th Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2008. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  35. Hazlewood KA,Brouse SD,Pitcher WD,Hall RG.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: grave concern or death by character assassination?Am J Med.2010;123:182187.
  36. Wong‐Beringer A,Joo J,Tse E,Beringer P.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: a critical appraisal of risk with high‐dose therapy.Int J Antimicrob Agents.2011;37:95101.
  37. Detrenis S,Meschi M,Musini S,Savazzi G.Lights and shadows on the pathogenesis of contrast‐induced nephropathy: state of the art.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005;20:15421550.
  38. Persson PB,Hansell P,Liss P.Pathophysiology of contrast medium‐induced nephropathy.Kidney Int.2005;68:1422.
  39. Kshirsagar AV,Poole C,Mottl A, et al.N‐acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy: a meta‐analysis of prospective controlled trials.J Am Soc Nephrol.2004;15:761769.
  40. Ocak S,Gorur S,Hakverdi S,Celik S,Erdogan S.Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester, vitamin C, vitamin E and N‐acetylcysteine on vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity in rats.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.2007;100:328333.
  41. Cosgrove SE,Vigliani GA,Fowler VG, et al.Initial low‐dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic.Clin Infect Dis.2009;48:713721.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 7(2)
Publications
Page Number
91-97
Legacy Keywords
contrast, nephrotoxicity, reversible, vancomycin
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of invasive infections and, in the United States, may now be responsible for more deaths than disease associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).1, 2 Vancomycin remains the drug of choice for invasive MRSA disease; from 1984 to 1996, its use in the United States escalated 6‐fold.3 With increased use of vancomycin, MRSA strains with partial and full resistance to vancomycin have emerged. Since 1997, S. aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin (VISA) as well as heteroresistance to vancomycin (hVISA) have been described.46 Several centers have also noted a slow rise in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) among clinical MRSA isolates (MIC creep).7 Low vancomycin trough levels have been implicated in the emergence of hVISA, and several studies have demonstrated a higher rate of vancomycin treatment failure, longer duration of fever, and prolonged hospitalization with hVISA and strains with elevated MIC compared to vancomycin‐susceptible MRSA.812 Until recently, vancomycin was frequently dosed to target trough levels <10 mg/L. The above concerns, combined with pharmacodynamic data suggesting that maintaining a ratio of vancomycin area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) 400 may be associated with improved clinical outcome,13 have prompted an expert consensus to recommend targeting higher vancomycin trough levels (typically 15‐20 mg/L) for invasive MRSA infections and general avoidance of trough levels <10 mg/L.14

The effect of higher trough levels on kidney function remains poorly understood, as does the mechanism of vancomycin‐induced renal injury itself, though animal studies demonstrate oxidative damage to renal tubules with high doses of vancomycin.15, 16 In previous studies, the incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity with lower troughs has been reported to range from 0% to 19% with vancomycin alone, increasing up to 35% with concomitant aminoglycoside therapy.1724 Limited studies have been done to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity at higher trough levels. Lodise and colleagues identified high‐dose vancomycin (>4 gm per day) as an independent risk factor for nephrotoxicity, when compared to administration of <4 gm of vancomycin per day or use of linezolid, and showed greater risk of nephrotoxicity with increasing vancomycin trough levels within the first 96 hours of vancomycin administration.25, 26 Hidayat et al. demonstrated, in a prospective cohort analysis, that patients with mean trough levels 15 mg/L had a significantly increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. In that study, patients who developed nephrotoxicity were more likely to receive other nephrotoxic agents, and troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were not distinguished.9 This is an important distinction, as vancomycin is frequently continued with dose adjustment even after nephrotoxicity occurs, with the nephrotoxicity resulting in subsequent higher troughs. Jeffres et al. demonstrated that maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L was associated with nephrotoxicity in patients with healthcare‐associated MRSA pneumonia; this study was retrospective and focused on a particularly ill patient population.27 Pritchard et al. also retrospectively reviewed 2493 courses of vancomycin at their institution, from 2003 to 2007, and found a significant relationship between vancomycin trough 14 mg/L and nephrotoxicity. The presence of comorbid disease states and concomitant nephrotoxins was determined in a subset of 130 courses in 2007; increasing vancomycin trough was associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariable analysis.28 However, it is not clear whether troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were distinguished in this study. At least 6 other retrospective studies involving small sample size or published in abstract form have widely different results in relating high vancomycin trough or aggressive vancomycin dosing strategies to nephrotoxicity.2934

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between development of nephrotoxicity and trough levels obtained during vancomycin therapy at a large veterans' hospital, while accounting for other potential nephrotoxins, and to evaluate the temporal association between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity. We chose to focus on nephrotoxicity that occurred on, or after, 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce other confounding factors of nephrotoxicity, since short durations of vancomycin frequently represent use in surgical prophylaxis or empirical therapy for hemodynamically unstable patients at high risk for renal injury.

Patients and Methods

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System during 2 time periods (May 1, 2005‐April 30, 2006 and Jan 1, 2007‐Dec 31, 2007) when hospital guidelines recommended different vancomycin dosing regimens based on indication. During the first time period, the recommended target trough level was 10 mg/L, regardless of indication. In May 2006, target troughs were changed according to the following institutional guidelines: 8‐12 mg/L for cellulitis, urinary tract infection (UTI), and uncomplicated bacteremia; 10‐15 mg/L for endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and visceral abscesses; and 15‐20 mg/L for bacterial meningitis and pneumonia. The vancomycin manufacturers (American Pharmaceutical Partners (Schaumburg, IL) and Baxter (Deerfield, IL)) were the same during both time periods. Patient data was collected from the VA Computerized Patient Records System (CPRS) by 2 trained reviewers (K.K.P. and T.P.). All inpatients who received 5 days of intravenous vancomycin therapy during these time periods were identified via electronic pharmacy records. We then excluded all patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/L prior to starting vancomycin, no serum creatinine collected before or during receipt of vancomycin, no trough levels drawn while on vancomycin (or for patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, no trough levels drawn prior to nephrotoxicity onset), nephrotoxicity occurring before day 5 of vancomycin therapy, and receipt of concomitant amphotericin B.

Data Collection and Study Definitions

In patients who received multiple courses of vancomycin during the specified time period, only the first course starting on, or after, May 1, 2005 and lasting 5 days was analyzed. Data collected for each patient included age, sex, race, and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, liver dysfunction, and active malignancy). Diabetes mellitus was defined as 2 fasting blood glucose levels >125, or receipt of insulin or other hypoglycemic medications during vancomycin treatment. Patients were considered to have liver disease if they had a prior diagnosis of cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatic insufficiency, or if 2 of the following criteria were met: total bilirubin >2 mg/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 the upper limit of normal, or serum albumin <3 g/dL. Receipt of 1 dose of potentially nephrotoxic agents, including aminoglycosides, intravenous furosemide, intravenous trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, intravenous contrast dye, potentially nephrotoxic chemotherapy, and vasopressors, were recorded beginning 72 hours prior to vancomycin therapy until onset of nephrotoxicity, or, if nephrotoxicity did not occur, the final vancomycin dose. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE‐I) and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin were considered potentially nephrotoxic if they were newly started within 72 hours of vancomycin.

For each patient, the serum creatinine was recorded upon admission, within 24 hours of starting vancomycin, during vancomycin treatment, and at 24 hours and 72 hours following the final vancomycin dose. Serum creatinine was typically measured daily. Per institutional protocol, vancomycin trough levels were drawn 30‐60 minutes prior to the fourth dose, and again in 5‐7 days or with any large change in renal function. Extrapolated troughs were calculated by a pharmacist if levels were drawn outside of the 60‐minute time period. The highest trough and duration of therapy was documented for each patient. The mean trough was equal to the arithmetic mean of all troughs obtained during vancomycin administration until 72 hours following the final dose.

Outcome Analysis

The primary end point was the development of nephrotoxicity, which was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either 0.5 mg/dL or 50% for at least 2 consecutive days after receipt of vancomycin, up to 72 hours after the final dose, compared to the last creatinine measured prior to vancomycin initiation. Patients who had a documented isolated increase in serum creatinine that resolved upon recheck within 24 hours were not classified as experiencing nephrotoxicity. In patients who developed nephrotoxicity, mean troughs, maximum troughs, duration of vancomycin treatment, and receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins were ascertained using data collected only before nephrotoxicity onset. Bivariate and multivariate models were subsequently constructed in order to determine risk factors for nephrotoxicity, using either mean or maximum trough achieved prior to nephrotoxicity for each patient.

Statistical Methods

Comparisons between the 2005‐2006 and 2007 groups were made using Student t test for continuous variables, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. Association of clinical variables with nephrotoxicity was assessed using bivariate logistic regression with subsequent multivariable logistic regression. We initially decided to use maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L as the vancomycin exposure variable of interest to include in multivariable models, as we felt that (1) trough 15 mg/L is clinically relevant given current guidelines that recommend aiming for trough 15 mg/L for treatment of most invasive staphylococcal disease,31 and (2) prior studies identified a single trough 15 mg/L as a possible risk factor for nephrotoxicity.9, 27, 29, 31 However, we also generated other multivariable models that included either maximum vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, mean vancomycin trough 15 mg/L, or mean vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, and models in which maximum and mean vancomycin troughs were treated as continuous variables. All variables were initially included in multivariable models; nonsignificant variables were removed from the models in a backwards stepwise fashion until likelihood ratio testing determined that removal of any variable was associated with likelihood ratio test P value <0.20 in comparing the full to reduced model. All calculated P values are two‐sided. All calculations were performed with STATA, version 10 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). This study was approved via expedited review by the Institutional Review Board of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

Results

Comparison of 2005‐2006 Versus 2007 Cohorts

Of the 705 patients who were identified by pharmacy records to have received intravenous vancomycin, 348 patients remained after exclusion criteria were applied; the vast majority of patients were excluded because they received <5 days of vancomycin therapy. Of the 348 patients included in the study, 201 received vancomycin in 2005‐2006, and 147 received vancomycin in 2007 (Table 1). Mean vancomycin trough was significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006 (average mean trough 13.2 mg/L 4.3 vs 9.7 mg/L 3.6; P < 0.0001), although median (8 vs 9 days) and mean (11.2 vs 12.2 days) duration of therapy was 1 day shorter in 2007 versus 2005‐2006. Age, sex, race, comorbidities, and indication for vancomycin use were similar between the 2 groups. The receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins was largely similar between the 2 time periods, with the primary exception being that a higher proportion of patients received intravenous contrast dye in 2007 (19%) than in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) (P = 0.003), and a lower proportion of patients received amikacin in 2007 (7.5%) than in 2005‐2006 (15%) (P = 0.043), though overall receipt of aminoglycosides was similar. Overall, nephrotoxicity was noted in 31 patients (8.9%), with similar incidence in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) and 2007 (10.2%) (P = 0.57). The median time to onset of nephrotoxicity was 7 days, with a median peak serum creatinine of 1.8 mg/dL.

Characteristics of Patients Treated With Vancomycin From May 2005 Through April 2006 and From January to December 2007
 2005‐2006 (n = 201)2007 (n = 147)P Value*Combined (n = 348)
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; IV, intravenous; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug.

  • Comparison of continuous variables done by Student t test, ordinal variables by Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and nominal variables by Fisher's exact test.

  • Osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection, endocarditis, meningitis, otomastoiditis, empiric therapy.

Patient characteristics    
Age (median years)59610.1860
Male gender (no. of patients)198 (99%)141 (96%)0.18339 (97.4%)
Race (no. of patients):    
White128 (63.7%)95 (64.6%)0.91223 (64.1%)
Black57 (28.4%)40 (27.2%)0.9097 (27.9%)
Other race16 (8%)12 (8.2%)1.0028 (8%)
Comorbidities (no. of patients):    
Diabetes75 (37.3%)50 (34%)0.57125 (35.9%)
Liver disease29 (14.4%)14 (9.5%)0.1943 (12.4%)
Malignancy33 (16.4%)21 (14.3%)0.6554 (15.5%)
Concomitant nephrotoxins (no. of patients):    
Aminoglycosides (any):41 (20.4%)25 (17.0%)0.4966 (19.0%)
Gentamicin11 (5.5%)14 (9.5%)0.2125 (7.2%)
Amikacin30 (14.9%)11 (7.5%)0.04341 (11.8%)
IV Furosemide53 (26.4%)34 (23.1%)0.5387 (25.0%)
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)20 (10%)10 (6.8%)0.3430 (8.6%)
NSAID (newly started)26 (12.9%)11 (7.5%)0.1237 (10.6%)
IV Trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole3 (1.5%)2 (1.4%)1.005 (1.4%)
Contrast dye16 (8%)28 (19.0%)0.00344 (12.6%)
Chemotherapy3 (1.5%)4 (2.7%)0.427 (2%)
Vasopressors (any):13 (6.5%)7 (4.8%)0.6420 (5.7%)
Dopamine4 (2%)1 (0.7%)0.405 (1.4%)
Epinephrine5 (2.5%)1 (0.7%)0.416 (1.7%)
Norepinephrine9 (4.5%)5 (3.4%)0.7814 (4.0%)
Phenylephrine2 (1.0%)1 (0.7%)1.003 (0.9%)
Vasopressin0 (0%)1 (0.7%)0.421 (0.3%)
Indication for vancomycin:    
Skin/soft tissue/bone infection112 (55.7%)77 (52.4%)0.59189 (54.3%)
Pneumonia26 (12.9%)26 (17.7%)0.2352 (14.9%)
Bacteremia26 (12.9%)14 (9.5%)0.4040 (11.5%)
Other37 (18.4%)30 (20.4%)0.6867 (19.3%)
Clinical outcomes    
Nephrotoxicity (no. of patients)16 (8%)15 (10.2%)0.5731 (8.9%)
Mean admission creatinine (mg/L)1.101.160.251.13
Mean vancomycin trough (mg/L)9.7113.2<0.000111.2
Mean highest vancomycin trough (mg/L)11.815.7<0.000113.5
Vancomycin duration (median days)980.0148

Determination of Clinical Factors for Nephrotoxicity

Results of bivariate and multivariate analysis of clinical factors potentially associated with nephrotoxicity are displayed in Table 2. Among the 31 patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, the mean maximum vancomycin trough prior to nephrotoxicity onset was 14.9 mg/L, compared to 13.3 mg/L among those not experiencing nephrotoxicity (OR 1.03 for each 1 mg/L increment in mean trough, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98‐1.09; P = 0.21). While there was a trend toward patients with nephrotoxicity having a maximum trough 15 mg/L, it was not significant in either bivariate (OR 2.18, 95% CI 0.85‐5.63; P = 0.11) or multivariate (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.91‐4.61; P = 0.082) analysis. The duration of vancomycin therapy was also not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, both when evaluated as a continuous variable and when prolonged courses (14 days) were compared to short courses (between 5 and 14 days) of therapy. Other multivariable models were constructed that included maximum trough 20 mg/L, mean trough 15 mg/L, mean trough 20 mg/L, and maximum and mean trough as continuous variables; in all of these models, the vancomycin exposure variable of interest was not significant enough to remain in the final model after backwards elimination. The only factor significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in either bivariate or multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.52‐8.68; P = 0.004 in multivariate analysis).

Association of Clinical Factors With Nephrotoxicity
Clinical FactorNT (n = 31)No NT (n = 317)Bivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Odds RatioP ValueOdds RatioP Value
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; NT, nephrotoxicity; TMP‐SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; SCr, serum creatinine.

  • Odds ratio per 1 mg/L increase in trough level.

  • Odds ratio per 1 additional day of vancomycin therapy.

Patient demographics      
Age (median)64 yr60 yr1.010.48  
Male sex31308N/A1.00  
Race:      
White172061.0 (reference)   
Black10871.390.43  
Other4242.020.24  
Vancomycin characteristics      
Mean trough (mg/L), mean per group:12.111.11.05*0.19  
Patients with mean trough <10 mg/L91401.0 (reference)   
Patients with mean trough 10‐15 mg/L151301.790.18  
Patients with mean trough 15 mg/L7472.320.11  
Highest trough (mg/L), mean per group14.913.31.03*0.21  
Patients with highest trough <10 mg/L71071.0 (reference)   
Patients with highest trough 10‐15 mg/L101121.360.54  
Patients with highest trough 15 mg/L14982.180.112.050.082
Days of vancomycin therapy (median)780.970.400.960.17
14 days of vancomycin therapy7711.010.98  
Clinical characteristics      
SCr >1 mg/L prior to vancomycin111360.730.43  
Diabetes101150.840.66  
Liver disease3400.740.64  
Malignancy5491.050.92  
Concomitant nephrotoxins (any):211741.730.17  
Aminoglycosides (any):7591.280.59  
Amikacin3380.790.70  
Gentamicin4212.090.21  
Furosemide (intravenous)10771.480.33  
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)1290.330.290.310.27
NSAIDs (newly started)2350.560.44  
TMP‐SMX (intravenous)237.220.034  
Contrast dye (intravenous)10343.960.0014.010.001
Chemotherapy161.730.62  
Vasopressors (any):1190.520.53  
Dopamine0501.0  
Epinephrine0601.0  
Norepinephrine1130.780.81  
Phenylephrine0301.0  
Vasopressin0101.0  

Reversibility of Nephrotoxicity

Of the 31 patients with nephrotoxicity, 20 (64.5%) patients still met criteria for nephrotoxicity at the time of vancomycin discontinuation. Nephrotoxicity subsequently resolved in 10 of the 16 patients that were still nephrotoxic at the time of vancomycin discontinuation (4 patients did not have follow‐up creatinine checked within 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation). Thus, overall reversibility of nephrotoxicity either prior to, or within, 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation was 77.8% (21/27 patients). Of the 6 patients who remained persistently nephrotoxic at 72 hours, all had received concomitant nephrotoxins prior to the onset of nephrotoxicity, as compared to 15/21 (71.4%) patients whose nephrotoxicity resolved (P = 0.28 by Fisher's exact test). Only 1 persistently nephrotoxic patient required dialysis: a critically ill patient with multiorgan failure for whom care was withdrawn within 4 days of vancomycin discontinuation.

DISCUSSION

Over the past 5 years, many institutions have adopted higher dosing guidelines for vancomycin, based on pharmacokinetic concerns related to its performance in the treatment of invasive staphylococcal disease. The data on nephrotoxicity at these higher troughs are limited. Previous studies that address the relationship between higher vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity suffer from small sample size29, 33; do not address reversibility of nephrotoxicity9, 26, 2931, 33; may not account for the temporal relationship between the development of nephrotoxicity and high trough levels,9, 2831 or examine patient populations at relatively high27 or low30 risk for renal injury apart from receipt of vancomycin. A recent expert consensus statement identified these factors as limiting the strength of evidence for a direct causal relationship between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity.14 A recent review by Hazlewood et al. concluded that the incidence of nephrotoxicity remains low in patients without preexisting renal disease and those not receiving concomitant nephrotoxins.35 The aim of our study was to identify whether or not there was a correlation between high‐dose vancomycin and nephrotoxicity, while accounting for their temporal relationship, concomitant nephrotoxin use, and reversibility. In particular, we chose to focus on nephrotoxicity occurring after at least 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce confounding by other possible sources of renal injury that may have affected the decision to initially prescribe vancomycin, an approach advocated by a recent review.36 While we noted that mean and maximum vancomycin troughs were significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006, incidence of nephrotoxicity was stable between the 2 time periods, with the higher rate of intravenous contrast dye in 2007 balanced in part by less aminoglycoside use. Overall, higher trough levels were not necessarily accompanied by a significant increase in nephrotoxicity, though there was a nonsignificant trend toward more nephrotoxic patients having maximum trough 15 mg/L.

The only clinical factor that was significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye. Of the 44 patients who received intravenous contrast dye, 10 (22.7%) experienced nephrotoxicity. Interestingly, in animal studies, both intravenous contrast dye37, 38 and high‐dose vancomycin15, 16 have been demonstrated to promote free radical formation within renal tissue, which is hypothesized to cause tubular damage primarily through vascular endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and subsequent reperfusion injury. N‐acetylcysteine is frequently administered to patients about to receive intravenous contrast dye (although its benefit remains controversial37, 39); N‐acetylcysteine has also been shown in an animal model to attenuate vancomycin‐induced renal injury.40

Receipt of concomitant aminoglycosides was not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, in contrast with previous studies. One meta‐analysis of 8 studies revealed found that the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with combination vancomycin and aminoglycosides was 13.3% greater than with vancomycin alone (P < 0.01) and 4.3% greater than therapy with an aminoglycoside alone (P < 0.05)20; another analysis of safety data of the clinical trial comparing daptomycin to comparator therapy including initial low‐dose gentamicin therapy in the treatment of S. aureus bacteremia found renal adverse events in 10 of 53 (19%) patients receiving vancomycin and gentamicin, compared to 8 of 120 (7%) patients receiving daptomycin.41 While our findings that show no clear relationship between concomitant vancomycin and aminoglycoside use and nephrotoxicity may have been due to the relatively small number of patients in our study who received aminoglycosides, it is worth noting that more patients in our study received aminoglycosides than intravenous contrast dye (66 vs 44 patients). The 77.8% overall resolution of nephrotoxicity observed in our study is similar to that reported by Farber and Moellering in 198319 and to that reported more recently with high‐dose vancomycin by Jeffres et al. and Teng et al.27, 34

Although we attempted to account for as many confounders as possible, the retrospective nature of our study prevents us from making definitive statements regarding the role of vancomycin trough levels and nephrotoxicity. In particular, we are unable to comment on any potential role vancomycin may have on nephrotoxicity within 5 days of its start or on patients with a baseline serum creatinine >2. Other significant limitations include our small proportion of female patients, and that we were not able to calculate severity of illness or determine the presence of congestive heart failure. Also, we may be dosing vancomycin less aggressively than other centers, and thus may have reduced power in determining whether higher troughs, particularly those 20 mg/L, are associated with nephrotoxicity; identification of more patients with higher troughs and a larger overall sample size may have yielded different results. Even in the 2007 group, a significant number of patients with cellulitis, UTI, and uncomplicated bacteremia had target troughs of 8‐12 mg/L. However, taken together, our findings do not support a definite relationship between vancomycin troughs and development of nephrotoxicity, and that when it does occur, it is largely reversible. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate the effects of aggressive vancomycin dosing regimens on nephrotoxicity, particularly those regimens that include large loading doses. Trials of antioxidative agents in patients receiving aggressive dosing regimens of vancomycin who require radiology studies involving intravenous contrast dye may be indicated as well.

Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of invasive infections and, in the United States, may now be responsible for more deaths than disease associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).1, 2 Vancomycin remains the drug of choice for invasive MRSA disease; from 1984 to 1996, its use in the United States escalated 6‐fold.3 With increased use of vancomycin, MRSA strains with partial and full resistance to vancomycin have emerged. Since 1997, S. aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin (VISA) as well as heteroresistance to vancomycin (hVISA) have been described.46 Several centers have also noted a slow rise in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) among clinical MRSA isolates (MIC creep).7 Low vancomycin trough levels have been implicated in the emergence of hVISA, and several studies have demonstrated a higher rate of vancomycin treatment failure, longer duration of fever, and prolonged hospitalization with hVISA and strains with elevated MIC compared to vancomycin‐susceptible MRSA.812 Until recently, vancomycin was frequently dosed to target trough levels <10 mg/L. The above concerns, combined with pharmacodynamic data suggesting that maintaining a ratio of vancomycin area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) 400 may be associated with improved clinical outcome,13 have prompted an expert consensus to recommend targeting higher vancomycin trough levels (typically 15‐20 mg/L) for invasive MRSA infections and general avoidance of trough levels <10 mg/L.14

The effect of higher trough levels on kidney function remains poorly understood, as does the mechanism of vancomycin‐induced renal injury itself, though animal studies demonstrate oxidative damage to renal tubules with high doses of vancomycin.15, 16 In previous studies, the incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity with lower troughs has been reported to range from 0% to 19% with vancomycin alone, increasing up to 35% with concomitant aminoglycoside therapy.1724 Limited studies have been done to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity at higher trough levels. Lodise and colleagues identified high‐dose vancomycin (>4 gm per day) as an independent risk factor for nephrotoxicity, when compared to administration of <4 gm of vancomycin per day or use of linezolid, and showed greater risk of nephrotoxicity with increasing vancomycin trough levels within the first 96 hours of vancomycin administration.25, 26 Hidayat et al. demonstrated, in a prospective cohort analysis, that patients with mean trough levels 15 mg/L had a significantly increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. In that study, patients who developed nephrotoxicity were more likely to receive other nephrotoxic agents, and troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were not distinguished.9 This is an important distinction, as vancomycin is frequently continued with dose adjustment even after nephrotoxicity occurs, with the nephrotoxicity resulting in subsequent higher troughs. Jeffres et al. demonstrated that maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L was associated with nephrotoxicity in patients with healthcare‐associated MRSA pneumonia; this study was retrospective and focused on a particularly ill patient population.27 Pritchard et al. also retrospectively reviewed 2493 courses of vancomycin at their institution, from 2003 to 2007, and found a significant relationship between vancomycin trough 14 mg/L and nephrotoxicity. The presence of comorbid disease states and concomitant nephrotoxins was determined in a subset of 130 courses in 2007; increasing vancomycin trough was associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariable analysis.28 However, it is not clear whether troughs collected before or after nephrotoxicity onset were distinguished in this study. At least 6 other retrospective studies involving small sample size or published in abstract form have widely different results in relating high vancomycin trough or aggressive vancomycin dosing strategies to nephrotoxicity.2934

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between development of nephrotoxicity and trough levels obtained during vancomycin therapy at a large veterans' hospital, while accounting for other potential nephrotoxins, and to evaluate the temporal association between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity. We chose to focus on nephrotoxicity that occurred on, or after, 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce other confounding factors of nephrotoxicity, since short durations of vancomycin frequently represent use in surgical prophylaxis or empirical therapy for hemodynamically unstable patients at high risk for renal injury.

Patients and Methods

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System during 2 time periods (May 1, 2005‐April 30, 2006 and Jan 1, 2007‐Dec 31, 2007) when hospital guidelines recommended different vancomycin dosing regimens based on indication. During the first time period, the recommended target trough level was 10 mg/L, regardless of indication. In May 2006, target troughs were changed according to the following institutional guidelines: 8‐12 mg/L for cellulitis, urinary tract infection (UTI), and uncomplicated bacteremia; 10‐15 mg/L for endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and visceral abscesses; and 15‐20 mg/L for bacterial meningitis and pneumonia. The vancomycin manufacturers (American Pharmaceutical Partners (Schaumburg, IL) and Baxter (Deerfield, IL)) were the same during both time periods. Patient data was collected from the VA Computerized Patient Records System (CPRS) by 2 trained reviewers (K.K.P. and T.P.). All inpatients who received 5 days of intravenous vancomycin therapy during these time periods were identified via electronic pharmacy records. We then excluded all patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/L prior to starting vancomycin, no serum creatinine collected before or during receipt of vancomycin, no trough levels drawn while on vancomycin (or for patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, no trough levels drawn prior to nephrotoxicity onset), nephrotoxicity occurring before day 5 of vancomycin therapy, and receipt of concomitant amphotericin B.

Data Collection and Study Definitions

In patients who received multiple courses of vancomycin during the specified time period, only the first course starting on, or after, May 1, 2005 and lasting 5 days was analyzed. Data collected for each patient included age, sex, race, and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, liver dysfunction, and active malignancy). Diabetes mellitus was defined as 2 fasting blood glucose levels >125, or receipt of insulin or other hypoglycemic medications during vancomycin treatment. Patients were considered to have liver disease if they had a prior diagnosis of cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatic insufficiency, or if 2 of the following criteria were met: total bilirubin >2 mg/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 the upper limit of normal, or serum albumin <3 g/dL. Receipt of 1 dose of potentially nephrotoxic agents, including aminoglycosides, intravenous furosemide, intravenous trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, intravenous contrast dye, potentially nephrotoxic chemotherapy, and vasopressors, were recorded beginning 72 hours prior to vancomycin therapy until onset of nephrotoxicity, or, if nephrotoxicity did not occur, the final vancomycin dose. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE‐I) and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin were considered potentially nephrotoxic if they were newly started within 72 hours of vancomycin.

For each patient, the serum creatinine was recorded upon admission, within 24 hours of starting vancomycin, during vancomycin treatment, and at 24 hours and 72 hours following the final vancomycin dose. Serum creatinine was typically measured daily. Per institutional protocol, vancomycin trough levels were drawn 30‐60 minutes prior to the fourth dose, and again in 5‐7 days or with any large change in renal function. Extrapolated troughs were calculated by a pharmacist if levels were drawn outside of the 60‐minute time period. The highest trough and duration of therapy was documented for each patient. The mean trough was equal to the arithmetic mean of all troughs obtained during vancomycin administration until 72 hours following the final dose.

Outcome Analysis

The primary end point was the development of nephrotoxicity, which was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either 0.5 mg/dL or 50% for at least 2 consecutive days after receipt of vancomycin, up to 72 hours after the final dose, compared to the last creatinine measured prior to vancomycin initiation. Patients who had a documented isolated increase in serum creatinine that resolved upon recheck within 24 hours were not classified as experiencing nephrotoxicity. In patients who developed nephrotoxicity, mean troughs, maximum troughs, duration of vancomycin treatment, and receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins were ascertained using data collected only before nephrotoxicity onset. Bivariate and multivariate models were subsequently constructed in order to determine risk factors for nephrotoxicity, using either mean or maximum trough achieved prior to nephrotoxicity for each patient.

Statistical Methods

Comparisons between the 2005‐2006 and 2007 groups were made using Student t test for continuous variables, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. Association of clinical variables with nephrotoxicity was assessed using bivariate logistic regression with subsequent multivariable logistic regression. We initially decided to use maximum vancomycin trough 15 mg/L as the vancomycin exposure variable of interest to include in multivariable models, as we felt that (1) trough 15 mg/L is clinically relevant given current guidelines that recommend aiming for trough 15 mg/L for treatment of most invasive staphylococcal disease,31 and (2) prior studies identified a single trough 15 mg/L as a possible risk factor for nephrotoxicity.9, 27, 29, 31 However, we also generated other multivariable models that included either maximum vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, mean vancomycin trough 15 mg/L, or mean vancomycin trough 20 mg/L, and models in which maximum and mean vancomycin troughs were treated as continuous variables. All variables were initially included in multivariable models; nonsignificant variables were removed from the models in a backwards stepwise fashion until likelihood ratio testing determined that removal of any variable was associated with likelihood ratio test P value <0.20 in comparing the full to reduced model. All calculated P values are two‐sided. All calculations were performed with STATA, version 10 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). This study was approved via expedited review by the Institutional Review Board of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

Results

Comparison of 2005‐2006 Versus 2007 Cohorts

Of the 705 patients who were identified by pharmacy records to have received intravenous vancomycin, 348 patients remained after exclusion criteria were applied; the vast majority of patients were excluded because they received <5 days of vancomycin therapy. Of the 348 patients included in the study, 201 received vancomycin in 2005‐2006, and 147 received vancomycin in 2007 (Table 1). Mean vancomycin trough was significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006 (average mean trough 13.2 mg/L 4.3 vs 9.7 mg/L 3.6; P < 0.0001), although median (8 vs 9 days) and mean (11.2 vs 12.2 days) duration of therapy was 1 day shorter in 2007 versus 2005‐2006. Age, sex, race, comorbidities, and indication for vancomycin use were similar between the 2 groups. The receipt of concomitant nephrotoxins was largely similar between the 2 time periods, with the primary exception being that a higher proportion of patients received intravenous contrast dye in 2007 (19%) than in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) (P = 0.003), and a lower proportion of patients received amikacin in 2007 (7.5%) than in 2005‐2006 (15%) (P = 0.043), though overall receipt of aminoglycosides was similar. Overall, nephrotoxicity was noted in 31 patients (8.9%), with similar incidence in 2005‐2006 (8.0%) and 2007 (10.2%) (P = 0.57). The median time to onset of nephrotoxicity was 7 days, with a median peak serum creatinine of 1.8 mg/dL.

Characteristics of Patients Treated With Vancomycin From May 2005 Through April 2006 and From January to December 2007
 2005‐2006 (n = 201)2007 (n = 147)P Value*Combined (n = 348)
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; IV, intravenous; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug.

  • Comparison of continuous variables done by Student t test, ordinal variables by Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and nominal variables by Fisher's exact test.

  • Osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection, endocarditis, meningitis, otomastoiditis, empiric therapy.

Patient characteristics    
Age (median years)59610.1860
Male gender (no. of patients)198 (99%)141 (96%)0.18339 (97.4%)
Race (no. of patients):    
White128 (63.7%)95 (64.6%)0.91223 (64.1%)
Black57 (28.4%)40 (27.2%)0.9097 (27.9%)
Other race16 (8%)12 (8.2%)1.0028 (8%)
Comorbidities (no. of patients):    
Diabetes75 (37.3%)50 (34%)0.57125 (35.9%)
Liver disease29 (14.4%)14 (9.5%)0.1943 (12.4%)
Malignancy33 (16.4%)21 (14.3%)0.6554 (15.5%)
Concomitant nephrotoxins (no. of patients):    
Aminoglycosides (any):41 (20.4%)25 (17.0%)0.4966 (19.0%)
Gentamicin11 (5.5%)14 (9.5%)0.2125 (7.2%)
Amikacin30 (14.9%)11 (7.5%)0.04341 (11.8%)
IV Furosemide53 (26.4%)34 (23.1%)0.5387 (25.0%)
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)20 (10%)10 (6.8%)0.3430 (8.6%)
NSAID (newly started)26 (12.9%)11 (7.5%)0.1237 (10.6%)
IV Trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole3 (1.5%)2 (1.4%)1.005 (1.4%)
Contrast dye16 (8%)28 (19.0%)0.00344 (12.6%)
Chemotherapy3 (1.5%)4 (2.7%)0.427 (2%)
Vasopressors (any):13 (6.5%)7 (4.8%)0.6420 (5.7%)
Dopamine4 (2%)1 (0.7%)0.405 (1.4%)
Epinephrine5 (2.5%)1 (0.7%)0.416 (1.7%)
Norepinephrine9 (4.5%)5 (3.4%)0.7814 (4.0%)
Phenylephrine2 (1.0%)1 (0.7%)1.003 (0.9%)
Vasopressin0 (0%)1 (0.7%)0.421 (0.3%)
Indication for vancomycin:    
Skin/soft tissue/bone infection112 (55.7%)77 (52.4%)0.59189 (54.3%)
Pneumonia26 (12.9%)26 (17.7%)0.2352 (14.9%)
Bacteremia26 (12.9%)14 (9.5%)0.4040 (11.5%)
Other37 (18.4%)30 (20.4%)0.6867 (19.3%)
Clinical outcomes    
Nephrotoxicity (no. of patients)16 (8%)15 (10.2%)0.5731 (8.9%)
Mean admission creatinine (mg/L)1.101.160.251.13
Mean vancomycin trough (mg/L)9.7113.2<0.000111.2
Mean highest vancomycin trough (mg/L)11.815.7<0.000113.5
Vancomycin duration (median days)980.0148

Determination of Clinical Factors for Nephrotoxicity

Results of bivariate and multivariate analysis of clinical factors potentially associated with nephrotoxicity are displayed in Table 2. Among the 31 patients experiencing nephrotoxicity, the mean maximum vancomycin trough prior to nephrotoxicity onset was 14.9 mg/L, compared to 13.3 mg/L among those not experiencing nephrotoxicity (OR 1.03 for each 1 mg/L increment in mean trough, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98‐1.09; P = 0.21). While there was a trend toward patients with nephrotoxicity having a maximum trough 15 mg/L, it was not significant in either bivariate (OR 2.18, 95% CI 0.85‐5.63; P = 0.11) or multivariate (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.91‐4.61; P = 0.082) analysis. The duration of vancomycin therapy was also not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, both when evaluated as a continuous variable and when prolonged courses (14 days) were compared to short courses (between 5 and 14 days) of therapy. Other multivariable models were constructed that included maximum trough 20 mg/L, mean trough 15 mg/L, mean trough 20 mg/L, and maximum and mean trough as continuous variables; in all of these models, the vancomycin exposure variable of interest was not significant enough to remain in the final model after backwards elimination. The only factor significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in either bivariate or multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.52‐8.68; P = 0.004 in multivariate analysis).

Association of Clinical Factors With Nephrotoxicity
Clinical FactorNT (n = 31)No NT (n = 317)Bivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Odds RatioP ValueOdds RatioP Value
  • Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; NT, nephrotoxicity; TMP‐SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; SCr, serum creatinine.

  • Odds ratio per 1 mg/L increase in trough level.

  • Odds ratio per 1 additional day of vancomycin therapy.

Patient demographics      
Age (median)64 yr60 yr1.010.48  
Male sex31308N/A1.00  
Race:      
White172061.0 (reference)   
Black10871.390.43  
Other4242.020.24  
Vancomycin characteristics      
Mean trough (mg/L), mean per group:12.111.11.05*0.19  
Patients with mean trough <10 mg/L91401.0 (reference)   
Patients with mean trough 10‐15 mg/L151301.790.18  
Patients with mean trough 15 mg/L7472.320.11  
Highest trough (mg/L), mean per group14.913.31.03*0.21  
Patients with highest trough <10 mg/L71071.0 (reference)   
Patients with highest trough 10‐15 mg/L101121.360.54  
Patients with highest trough 15 mg/L14982.180.112.050.082
Days of vancomycin therapy (median)780.970.400.960.17
14 days of vancomycin therapy7711.010.98  
Clinical characteristics      
SCr >1 mg/L prior to vancomycin111360.730.43  
Diabetes101150.840.66  
Liver disease3400.740.64  
Malignancy5491.050.92  
Concomitant nephrotoxins (any):211741.730.17  
Aminoglycosides (any):7591.280.59  
Amikacin3380.790.70  
Gentamicin4212.090.21  
Furosemide (intravenous)10771.480.33  
ACE‐inhibitor (newly started)1290.330.290.310.27
NSAIDs (newly started)2350.560.44  
TMP‐SMX (intravenous)237.220.034  
Contrast dye (intravenous)10343.960.0014.010.001
Chemotherapy161.730.62  
Vasopressors (any):1190.520.53  
Dopamine0501.0  
Epinephrine0601.0  
Norepinephrine1130.780.81  
Phenylephrine0301.0  
Vasopressin0101.0  

Reversibility of Nephrotoxicity

Of the 31 patients with nephrotoxicity, 20 (64.5%) patients still met criteria for nephrotoxicity at the time of vancomycin discontinuation. Nephrotoxicity subsequently resolved in 10 of the 16 patients that were still nephrotoxic at the time of vancomycin discontinuation (4 patients did not have follow‐up creatinine checked within 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation). Thus, overall reversibility of nephrotoxicity either prior to, or within, 72 hours of vancomycin discontinuation was 77.8% (21/27 patients). Of the 6 patients who remained persistently nephrotoxic at 72 hours, all had received concomitant nephrotoxins prior to the onset of nephrotoxicity, as compared to 15/21 (71.4%) patients whose nephrotoxicity resolved (P = 0.28 by Fisher's exact test). Only 1 persistently nephrotoxic patient required dialysis: a critically ill patient with multiorgan failure for whom care was withdrawn within 4 days of vancomycin discontinuation.

DISCUSSION

Over the past 5 years, many institutions have adopted higher dosing guidelines for vancomycin, based on pharmacokinetic concerns related to its performance in the treatment of invasive staphylococcal disease. The data on nephrotoxicity at these higher troughs are limited. Previous studies that address the relationship between higher vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity suffer from small sample size29, 33; do not address reversibility of nephrotoxicity9, 26, 2931, 33; may not account for the temporal relationship between the development of nephrotoxicity and high trough levels,9, 2831 or examine patient populations at relatively high27 or low30 risk for renal injury apart from receipt of vancomycin. A recent expert consensus statement identified these factors as limiting the strength of evidence for a direct causal relationship between elevated vancomycin troughs and nephrotoxicity.14 A recent review by Hazlewood et al. concluded that the incidence of nephrotoxicity remains low in patients without preexisting renal disease and those not receiving concomitant nephrotoxins.35 The aim of our study was to identify whether or not there was a correlation between high‐dose vancomycin and nephrotoxicity, while accounting for their temporal relationship, concomitant nephrotoxin use, and reversibility. In particular, we chose to focus on nephrotoxicity occurring after at least 5 days of vancomycin therapy in order to reduce confounding by other possible sources of renal injury that may have affected the decision to initially prescribe vancomycin, an approach advocated by a recent review.36 While we noted that mean and maximum vancomycin troughs were significantly higher in 2007 than 2005‐2006, incidence of nephrotoxicity was stable between the 2 time periods, with the higher rate of intravenous contrast dye in 2007 balanced in part by less aminoglycoside use. Overall, higher trough levels were not necessarily accompanied by a significant increase in nephrotoxicity, though there was a nonsignificant trend toward more nephrotoxic patients having maximum trough 15 mg/L.

The only clinical factor that was significantly associated with nephrotoxicity in multivariate analysis was receipt of intravenous contrast dye. Of the 44 patients who received intravenous contrast dye, 10 (22.7%) experienced nephrotoxicity. Interestingly, in animal studies, both intravenous contrast dye37, 38 and high‐dose vancomycin15, 16 have been demonstrated to promote free radical formation within renal tissue, which is hypothesized to cause tubular damage primarily through vascular endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and subsequent reperfusion injury. N‐acetylcysteine is frequently administered to patients about to receive intravenous contrast dye (although its benefit remains controversial37, 39); N‐acetylcysteine has also been shown in an animal model to attenuate vancomycin‐induced renal injury.40

Receipt of concomitant aminoglycosides was not significantly associated with nephrotoxicity, in contrast with previous studies. One meta‐analysis of 8 studies revealed found that the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with combination vancomycin and aminoglycosides was 13.3% greater than with vancomycin alone (P < 0.01) and 4.3% greater than therapy with an aminoglycoside alone (P < 0.05)20; another analysis of safety data of the clinical trial comparing daptomycin to comparator therapy including initial low‐dose gentamicin therapy in the treatment of S. aureus bacteremia found renal adverse events in 10 of 53 (19%) patients receiving vancomycin and gentamicin, compared to 8 of 120 (7%) patients receiving daptomycin.41 While our findings that show no clear relationship between concomitant vancomycin and aminoglycoside use and nephrotoxicity may have been due to the relatively small number of patients in our study who received aminoglycosides, it is worth noting that more patients in our study received aminoglycosides than intravenous contrast dye (66 vs 44 patients). The 77.8% overall resolution of nephrotoxicity observed in our study is similar to that reported by Farber and Moellering in 198319 and to that reported more recently with high‐dose vancomycin by Jeffres et al. and Teng et al.27, 34

Although we attempted to account for as many confounders as possible, the retrospective nature of our study prevents us from making definitive statements regarding the role of vancomycin trough levels and nephrotoxicity. In particular, we are unable to comment on any potential role vancomycin may have on nephrotoxicity within 5 days of its start or on patients with a baseline serum creatinine >2. Other significant limitations include our small proportion of female patients, and that we were not able to calculate severity of illness or determine the presence of congestive heart failure. Also, we may be dosing vancomycin less aggressively than other centers, and thus may have reduced power in determining whether higher troughs, particularly those 20 mg/L, are associated with nephrotoxicity; identification of more patients with higher troughs and a larger overall sample size may have yielded different results. Even in the 2007 group, a significant number of patients with cellulitis, UTI, and uncomplicated bacteremia had target troughs of 8‐12 mg/L. However, taken together, our findings do not support a definite relationship between vancomycin troughs and development of nephrotoxicity, and that when it does occur, it is largely reversible. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate the effects of aggressive vancomycin dosing regimens on nephrotoxicity, particularly those regimens that include large loading doses. Trials of antioxidative agents in patients receiving aggressive dosing regimens of vancomycin who require radiology studies involving intravenous contrast dye may be indicated as well.

References
  1. Bancroft EA.Antimicrobial resistance: it's not just for hospitals.JAMA.2007;298:18031804.
  2. Klevens RM,Morrison MA,Nadle J, et al.Invasive methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States.JAMA.2007;298:17631771.
  3. Kirst HA,Thompson DG,Nicas TI.Historical yearly usage of vancomycin.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1998;42:13031304.
  4. Hiramatsu K,Aritaka N,Hanaki H, et al.Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.Lancet.1997;350:16701673.
  5. Hiramatsu K,Hanaki H,Ino T,Yabuta K,Oguri T,Tenover FC.Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.J Antimicrob Chemother.1997;40:135136.
  6. Liu C,Chambers HF.Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2003;47:30403045.
  7. Steinkraus G,White R,Friedrich L.Vancomycin MIC creep in non‐vancomycin‐intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin‐susceptible clinical methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05.J Antimicrob Chemother.2007;60:788794.
  8. Charles PG,Ward PB,Johnson PD,Howden BP,Grayson ML.Clinical features associated with bacteremia due to heterogeneous vancomycin‐ intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:448451.
  9. Hidayat LK,Hsu DI,Quist R,Shriner KA,Wong‐Beringer A.High‐dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity.Arch Intern Med.2006;166:21382144.
  10. Moise‐Broder PA,Sakoulas G,Eliopoulos GM,Schentag JJ,Forrest A,Moellering RC.Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:17001705.
  11. Sakoulas G,Moise‐Broder PA,Schentag J,Forrest A,Moellering RC,Eliopoulos GM.Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.J Clin Microbiol.2004;42:23982402.
  12. Tenover FC,Moellering RC.The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2007;44:12081215.
  13. Moise‐Broder PA,Forrest A,Birmingham MC,Schentag JJ.Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.Clin Pharmacokinet.2004;43:925942.
  14. Rybak M,Lomaestro B,Rotschafer JC, et al.Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.Am J Health Syst Pharm.2009;66:8298.
  15. Dieterich C,Puey A,Lin S, et al.Gene expression analysis reveals new possible mechanisms of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity and identifies gene markers candidates.Toxicol Sci.2009;107:258269.
  16. Oktem F,Arslan MK,Ozguner F, et al.In vivo evidences suggesting the role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity: protection by erdosteine.Toxicology.2005;215:227233.
  17. Cimino MA,Rotstein C,Slaughter RL,Emrich LJ.Relationship of serum antibiotic concentrations to nephrotoxicity in cancer patients receiving concurrent aminoglycoside and vancomycin therapy.Am J Med.1987;83:10911097.
  18. Downs NJ,Neihart RE,Dolezal JM,Hodges GR.Mild nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin use.Arch Intern Med.1989;149:17771781.
  19. Farber BF,Moellering RC.Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1983;23:138141.
  20. Goetz MB,Sayers J.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin and aminoglycoside therapy separately and in combination.J Antimicrob Chemother.1993;32:325334.
  21. Mellor JA,Kingdom J,Cafferkey M,Keane CT.Vancomycin toxicity: a prospective study.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;15:773780.
  22. Pauly DJ,Musa DM,Lestico MR,Lindstrom MJ,Hetsko CM.Risk of nephrotoxicity with combination vancomycin‐aminoglycoside antibiotic therapy.Pharmacotherapy.1990;10:378382.
  23. Rybak MJ,Albrecht LM,Boike SC,Chandrasekar PH.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin, alone and with an aminoglycoside.J Antimicrob Chemother.1990;25:679687.
  24. Sorrell TC,Collignon PJ.A prospective study of adverse reactions associated with vancomycin therapy.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;16:235241.
  25. Lodise TP,Lomaestro B,Graves J,Drusano GL.Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2008;52:13301336.
  26. Lodise TP,Patel N,Lomaestro BM,Rodvold KA,Drusano GL.Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration‐time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients.Clin Infect Dis.2009;49:507514.
  27. Jeffres MN,Isakow W,Doherty JA,Micek ST,Kollef MH.A retrospective analysis of possible renal toxicity associated with vancomycin in patients with health care‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.Clin Ther.2007;29:11071115.
  28. Pritchard L,Baker C,Leggett J,Sehdev P,Brown A,Bayley KB.Increasing vancomycin serum trough concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity.Am J Med.2010;123:11431149.
  29. Lee‐Such SC,Overholser BR,Munoz‐Price LS. Nephrotoxicity associated with aggressive vancomycin therapy [abstract L‐1298]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2006. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  30. Mora A,Dzintars D,Lat A,Frei CR,Echevarria K. Incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in the absence of concomitant nephrotoxins or confounders [abstract A1–1294b]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  31. Nguyen M,Wong J,Lee C, et al. Nephrotoxicity associated with high‐dose versus standard‐dose vancomycin therapy [abstract K‐1096]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2007. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  32. Rios E,Pounders CL,Allison T. Evaluation of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in patients with methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia [abstract A1–1294a]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  33. Zimmerman AE,Katona BG,Plaisance KI.Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with outcomes in patients with gram‐positive bacteremia.Pharmacotherapy.1995;15:8591.
  34. Teng CG,Rezai K,Itokazu GS, et al. Continuation of high dose vancomycin despite nephrotoxicity [abstract K‐3486]. In:Abstracts of the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/46th Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2008. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  35. Hazlewood KA,Brouse SD,Pitcher WD,Hall RG.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: grave concern or death by character assassination?Am J Med.2010;123:182187.
  36. Wong‐Beringer A,Joo J,Tse E,Beringer P.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: a critical appraisal of risk with high‐dose therapy.Int J Antimicrob Agents.2011;37:95101.
  37. Detrenis S,Meschi M,Musini S,Savazzi G.Lights and shadows on the pathogenesis of contrast‐induced nephropathy: state of the art.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005;20:15421550.
  38. Persson PB,Hansell P,Liss P.Pathophysiology of contrast medium‐induced nephropathy.Kidney Int.2005;68:1422.
  39. Kshirsagar AV,Poole C,Mottl A, et al.N‐acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy: a meta‐analysis of prospective controlled trials.J Am Soc Nephrol.2004;15:761769.
  40. Ocak S,Gorur S,Hakverdi S,Celik S,Erdogan S.Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester, vitamin C, vitamin E and N‐acetylcysteine on vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity in rats.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.2007;100:328333.
  41. Cosgrove SE,Vigliani GA,Fowler VG, et al.Initial low‐dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic.Clin Infect Dis.2009;48:713721.
References
  1. Bancroft EA.Antimicrobial resistance: it's not just for hospitals.JAMA.2007;298:18031804.
  2. Klevens RM,Morrison MA,Nadle J, et al.Invasive methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States.JAMA.2007;298:17631771.
  3. Kirst HA,Thompson DG,Nicas TI.Historical yearly usage of vancomycin.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1998;42:13031304.
  4. Hiramatsu K,Aritaka N,Hanaki H, et al.Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.Lancet.1997;350:16701673.
  5. Hiramatsu K,Hanaki H,Ino T,Yabuta K,Oguri T,Tenover FC.Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.J Antimicrob Chemother.1997;40:135136.
  6. Liu C,Chambers HF.Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2003;47:30403045.
  7. Steinkraus G,White R,Friedrich L.Vancomycin MIC creep in non‐vancomycin‐intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin‐susceptible clinical methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05.J Antimicrob Chemother.2007;60:788794.
  8. Charles PG,Ward PB,Johnson PD,Howden BP,Grayson ML.Clinical features associated with bacteremia due to heterogeneous vancomycin‐ intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:448451.
  9. Hidayat LK,Hsu DI,Quist R,Shriner KA,Wong‐Beringer A.High‐dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity.Arch Intern Med.2006;166:21382144.
  10. Moise‐Broder PA,Sakoulas G,Eliopoulos GM,Schentag JJ,Forrest A,Moellering RC.Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy.Clin Infect Dis.2004;38:17001705.
  11. Sakoulas G,Moise‐Broder PA,Schentag J,Forrest A,Moellering RC,Eliopoulos GM.Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.J Clin Microbiol.2004;42:23982402.
  12. Tenover FC,Moellering RC.The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus.Clin Infect Dis.2007;44:12081215.
  13. Moise‐Broder PA,Forrest A,Birmingham MC,Schentag JJ.Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.Clin Pharmacokinet.2004;43:925942.
  14. Rybak M,Lomaestro B,Rotschafer JC, et al.Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.Am J Health Syst Pharm.2009;66:8298.
  15. Dieterich C,Puey A,Lin S, et al.Gene expression analysis reveals new possible mechanisms of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity and identifies gene markers candidates.Toxicol Sci.2009;107:258269.
  16. Oktem F,Arslan MK,Ozguner F, et al.In vivo evidences suggesting the role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity: protection by erdosteine.Toxicology.2005;215:227233.
  17. Cimino MA,Rotstein C,Slaughter RL,Emrich LJ.Relationship of serum antibiotic concentrations to nephrotoxicity in cancer patients receiving concurrent aminoglycoside and vancomycin therapy.Am J Med.1987;83:10911097.
  18. Downs NJ,Neihart RE,Dolezal JM,Hodges GR.Mild nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin use.Arch Intern Med.1989;149:17771781.
  19. Farber BF,Moellering RC.Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1983;23:138141.
  20. Goetz MB,Sayers J.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin and aminoglycoside therapy separately and in combination.J Antimicrob Chemother.1993;32:325334.
  21. Mellor JA,Kingdom J,Cafferkey M,Keane CT.Vancomycin toxicity: a prospective study.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;15:773780.
  22. Pauly DJ,Musa DM,Lestico MR,Lindstrom MJ,Hetsko CM.Risk of nephrotoxicity with combination vancomycin‐aminoglycoside antibiotic therapy.Pharmacotherapy.1990;10:378382.
  23. Rybak MJ,Albrecht LM,Boike SC,Chandrasekar PH.Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin, alone and with an aminoglycoside.J Antimicrob Chemother.1990;25:679687.
  24. Sorrell TC,Collignon PJ.A prospective study of adverse reactions associated with vancomycin therapy.J Antimicrob Chemother.1985;16:235241.
  25. Lodise TP,Lomaestro B,Graves J,Drusano GL.Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2008;52:13301336.
  26. Lodise TP,Patel N,Lomaestro BM,Rodvold KA,Drusano GL.Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration‐time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients.Clin Infect Dis.2009;49:507514.
  27. Jeffres MN,Isakow W,Doherty JA,Micek ST,Kollef MH.A retrospective analysis of possible renal toxicity associated with vancomycin in patients with health care‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.Clin Ther.2007;29:11071115.
  28. Pritchard L,Baker C,Leggett J,Sehdev P,Brown A,Bayley KB.Increasing vancomycin serum trough concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity.Am J Med.2010;123:11431149.
  29. Lee‐Such SC,Overholser BR,Munoz‐Price LS. Nephrotoxicity associated with aggressive vancomycin therapy [abstract L‐1298]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2006. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  30. Mora A,Dzintars D,Lat A,Frei CR,Echevarria K. Incidence of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in the absence of concomitant nephrotoxins or confounders [abstract A1–1294b]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  31. Nguyen M,Wong J,Lee C, et al. Nephrotoxicity associated with high‐dose versus standard‐dose vancomycin therapy [abstract K‐1096]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2007. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  32. Rios E,Pounders CL,Allison T. Evaluation of vancomycin nephrotoxicity in patients with methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia [abstract A1–1294a]. In:Program and Abstracts of the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2009. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  33. Zimmerman AE,Katona BG,Plaisance KI.Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with outcomes in patients with gram‐positive bacteremia.Pharmacotherapy.1995;15:8591.
  34. Teng CG,Rezai K,Itokazu GS, et al. Continuation of high dose vancomycin despite nephrotoxicity [abstract K‐3486]. In:Abstracts of the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/46th Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2008. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  35. Hazlewood KA,Brouse SD,Pitcher WD,Hall RG.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: grave concern or death by character assassination?Am J Med.2010;123:182187.
  36. Wong‐Beringer A,Joo J,Tse E,Beringer P.Vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity: a critical appraisal of risk with high‐dose therapy.Int J Antimicrob Agents.2011;37:95101.
  37. Detrenis S,Meschi M,Musini S,Savazzi G.Lights and shadows on the pathogenesis of contrast‐induced nephropathy: state of the art.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005;20:15421550.
  38. Persson PB,Hansell P,Liss P.Pathophysiology of contrast medium‐induced nephropathy.Kidney Int.2005;68:1422.
  39. Kshirsagar AV,Poole C,Mottl A, et al.N‐acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy: a meta‐analysis of prospective controlled trials.J Am Soc Nephrol.2004;15:761769.
  40. Ocak S,Gorur S,Hakverdi S,Celik S,Erdogan S.Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester, vitamin C, vitamin E and N‐acetylcysteine on vancomycin‐induced nephrotoxicity in rats.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.2007;100:328333.
  41. Cosgrove SE,Vigliani GA,Fowler VG, et al.Initial low‐dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic.Clin Infect Dis.2009;48:713721.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 7(2)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 7(2)
Page Number
91-97
Page Number
91-97
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Elevated vancomycin trough is not associated with nephrotoxicity among inpatient veterans
Display Headline
Elevated vancomycin trough is not associated with nephrotoxicity among inpatient veterans
Legacy Keywords
contrast, nephrotoxicity, reversible, vancomycin
Legacy Keywords
contrast, nephrotoxicity, reversible, vancomycin
Sections
Article Source

Copyright © 2011 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Infectious Diseases Section, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, 111‐F, Los Angeles, CA 90073
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media
Media Files