Clinical Impact of Biweekly Liver Function Tests During the First Three Months of Abiraterone Therapy in a Veteran Population

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:30

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical impact of biweekly liver function tests (LFTs) during the first 3 months of abiraterone therapy in veterans with prostate cancer.

Background: Abiraterone monitoring recommendations include biweekly LFTs for 3 months, then monthly based on concerns of early hepatoxicity in a limited number of patients. Veterans at the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RLRVAMC) appear to tolerate abiraterone without clinically significant hepatoxicity despite stringent monitoring. There appears to be an opportunity to improve patient satisfaction/ quality of life and decrease cost to the healthcare system.

Methods: Patients were included in this retrospective chart review if abiraterone was initiated through the RLRVAMC between May 2014 and July 2018. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation within three months due to rising prostate-specific antigen or adverse drug events unrelated to hepatotoxicity, prior abiraterone exposure, and management outside RLRVAMC. Primary outcome was incidence and severity of LFT changes. Secondary outcomes included incidence and cause of dose reduction and death. Descriptive statistics analyzed outcomes. Severity of toxicity was classified according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.

Results: Ninety patients were included. Across three months of treatment, 24 (26.7%), 2 (2.2%), 0, and 2 (2.2%) patients experienced maximum CTCAE grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 LFT changes, respectively. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 LFT changes, both with previous therapy modifications due to grade 1 or 2 LFT changes and acute illness. Therapy modifications for any reason occurred in 4.4% of patients, all due to acute illness, general tolerability concerns, or grade 1 or 2 LFT changes. Four patients experienced death. No deaths were considered directly related to abiraterone.

Implications: Need for week 10 laboratory monitoring may be determined based on patient specific criteria. Reduction in laboratory monitoring may increase patient satisfaction/quality of life and decrease unnecessary costs to the healthcare system. Patients initiated on abiraterone through the RLRVAMC will receive monthly monitoring starting at week eight in the absence of baseline risk factors for hepatoxicity, grade 2 or worsening grade 1 changes during the first two months of therapy, or new grade 1 changes identified at week eight of therapy

Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Andrew Johnson (andrew.johnson27@va.gov)

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Andrew Johnson (andrew.johnson27@va.gov)

Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Andrew Johnson (andrew.johnson27@va.gov)

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical impact of biweekly liver function tests (LFTs) during the first 3 months of abiraterone therapy in veterans with prostate cancer.

Background: Abiraterone monitoring recommendations include biweekly LFTs for 3 months, then monthly based on concerns of early hepatoxicity in a limited number of patients. Veterans at the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RLRVAMC) appear to tolerate abiraterone without clinically significant hepatoxicity despite stringent monitoring. There appears to be an opportunity to improve patient satisfaction/ quality of life and decrease cost to the healthcare system.

Methods: Patients were included in this retrospective chart review if abiraterone was initiated through the RLRVAMC between May 2014 and July 2018. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation within three months due to rising prostate-specific antigen or adverse drug events unrelated to hepatotoxicity, prior abiraterone exposure, and management outside RLRVAMC. Primary outcome was incidence and severity of LFT changes. Secondary outcomes included incidence and cause of dose reduction and death. Descriptive statistics analyzed outcomes. Severity of toxicity was classified according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.

Results: Ninety patients were included. Across three months of treatment, 24 (26.7%), 2 (2.2%), 0, and 2 (2.2%) patients experienced maximum CTCAE grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 LFT changes, respectively. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 LFT changes, both with previous therapy modifications due to grade 1 or 2 LFT changes and acute illness. Therapy modifications for any reason occurred in 4.4% of patients, all due to acute illness, general tolerability concerns, or grade 1 or 2 LFT changes. Four patients experienced death. No deaths were considered directly related to abiraterone.

Implications: Need for week 10 laboratory monitoring may be determined based on patient specific criteria. Reduction in laboratory monitoring may increase patient satisfaction/quality of life and decrease unnecessary costs to the healthcare system. Patients initiated on abiraterone through the RLRVAMC will receive monthly monitoring starting at week eight in the absence of baseline risk factors for hepatoxicity, grade 2 or worsening grade 1 changes during the first two months of therapy, or new grade 1 changes identified at week eight of therapy

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical impact of biweekly liver function tests (LFTs) during the first 3 months of abiraterone therapy in veterans with prostate cancer.

Background: Abiraterone monitoring recommendations include biweekly LFTs for 3 months, then monthly based on concerns of early hepatoxicity in a limited number of patients. Veterans at the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RLRVAMC) appear to tolerate abiraterone without clinically significant hepatoxicity despite stringent monitoring. There appears to be an opportunity to improve patient satisfaction/ quality of life and decrease cost to the healthcare system.

Methods: Patients were included in this retrospective chart review if abiraterone was initiated through the RLRVAMC between May 2014 and July 2018. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation within three months due to rising prostate-specific antigen or adverse drug events unrelated to hepatotoxicity, prior abiraterone exposure, and management outside RLRVAMC. Primary outcome was incidence and severity of LFT changes. Secondary outcomes included incidence and cause of dose reduction and death. Descriptive statistics analyzed outcomes. Severity of toxicity was classified according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.

Results: Ninety patients were included. Across three months of treatment, 24 (26.7%), 2 (2.2%), 0, and 2 (2.2%) patients experienced maximum CTCAE grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 LFT changes, respectively. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 LFT changes, both with previous therapy modifications due to grade 1 or 2 LFT changes and acute illness. Therapy modifications for any reason occurred in 4.4% of patients, all due to acute illness, general tolerability concerns, or grade 1 or 2 LFT changes. Four patients experienced death. No deaths were considered directly related to abiraterone.

Implications: Need for week 10 laboratory monitoring may be determined based on patient specific criteria. Reduction in laboratory monitoring may increase patient satisfaction/quality of life and decrease unnecessary costs to the healthcare system. Patients initiated on abiraterone through the RLRVAMC will receive monthly monitoring starting at week eight in the absence of baseline risk factors for hepatoxicity, grade 2 or worsening grade 1 changes during the first two months of therapy, or new grade 1 changes identified at week eight of therapy

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Citation Override
Abstract Presented at the 2019 Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Annual Meeting
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:30
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/19/2019 - 13:52
Display Headline
Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Christopher R. Costa, MD, Aaron J. Johnson, MD, Qais Naziri, MD, German A. Marulanda, MD, Ronald E. Delanois, MD, and Michael A. Mont, MD

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
160-165
Legacy Keywords
orthopedic; Periprosthetic infection; diagnosis; total hip arthroplasty; infection, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein; serologic markers; Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections; Christopher R. Costa; Aaron J. Johnson; Qais Naziri; German A. Marulanda; Ronald E. Delanois; Michael A. Mont; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Christopher R. Costa, MD, Aaron J. Johnson, MD, Qais Naziri, MD, German A. Marulanda, MD, Ronald E. Delanois, MD, and Michael A. Mont, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Christopher R. Costa, MD, Aaron J. Johnson, MD, Qais Naziri, MD, German A. Marulanda, MD, Ronald E. Delanois, MD, and Michael A. Mont, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(4)
Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(4)
Page Number
160-165
Page Number
160-165
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections
Display Headline
Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections
Legacy Keywords
orthopedic; Periprosthetic infection; diagnosis; total hip arthroplasty; infection, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein; serologic markers; Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections; Christopher R. Costa; Aaron J. Johnson; Qais Naziri; German A. Marulanda; Ronald E. Delanois; Michael A. Mont; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Legacy Keywords
orthopedic; Periprosthetic infection; diagnosis; total hip arthroplasty; infection, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein; serologic markers; Efficacy of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level in Determining Periprosthetic Hip Infections; Christopher R. Costa; Aaron J. Johnson; Qais Naziri; German A. Marulanda; Ronald E. Delanois; Michael A. Mont; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media