Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:23
Display Headline
Does antepartum perineal massage reduce intrapartum lacerations?
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Yes—to a point. Antepartum perineal massage reduces both the incidence of perineal trauma requiring suturing and the likelihood of episiotomy in women who have never given birth vaginally. It reduces the incidence of postpartum perineal pain in women who have given birth vaginally. Perineal massage doesn’t reduce the frequency of first- or second-degree lacerations or third- and fourth-degree perineal trauma. (Strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs].)

Clinical commentary

Raise the subject, then let the patient decide
Timothy E. Huber, MD
Oroville, Calif

Perineal massage is relatively easy to describe and do, but its intimate nature can make physicians and patients alike feel uncomfortable. The benefit for primigravid women justifies asking appropriate patients at least an exploratory question or 2 during early and second-trimester visits.

A question such as, “How much do you know about the process of having a vaginal delivery?” often prompts inquiries about pain control, delivery techniques, episiotomy, and tears. These inquiries can provide an opportunity to discuss perineal massage as a safe, effective technique to reduce the chance of an episiotomy, need for suturing, and long-term postpartum pain. Letting the patient make up her own mind can give her more confidence as the big day approaches.

Evidence summary

A systematic review evaluating whether antepartum perineal massage reduced perineal trauma included 3 RCTs with a total of 1941 primagravidas and 493 multigravidas.1 Women were randomized to receive either instruction in perineal massage or no instruction.

Beginning at 34 weeks, women or their partners performed perineal massage for 4 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week,2 or once a day for 10 minutes.3,4 Massage was performed by inserting 1 or 2 fingers 3 to 5 cm into the vagina and sweeping downward and from side to side, using almond oil for lubrication.

 

Birth attendants were blinded to patients’ assignments. All studies evaluated immediate postpartum outcomes; 1 study included a 3-month follow-up questionnaire.3

Massage reduces trauma, but less is more

Massage reduced perineal trauma requiring suturing by 10% among primigravid patients, compared with controls (relative risk [RR]=0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96; number needed to treat [NNT]=14). Subgroup analysis revealed an inverse relationship between reduced trauma and frequency of massage: Primagravidas who massaged fewer than 1.5 times a week showed a 17% reduction (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92; NNT=9), compared with an 8% reduction for women who massaged 1.5 to 3.4 times a week (RR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00; NNT=22) and a statistically insignificant 7% reduction for the group that massaged more than 3.5 times a week (RR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02).

 

 

 

Perineal massage reduced the incidence of episiotomy by 15% among primigravidas compared with controls (RR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; NNT=20); the largest reduction occurred in primagravidas who massaged as often as 1.5 times per week (RR=0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91). This effect was not seen in primagravidas who massaged more often. Multigravid patients didn’t experience a statistically significant reduction in episiotomy.

Perineal massage didn’t affect the overall incidence of first- and second-degree perineal lacerations (first-degree laceration: RR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16; second-degree laceration: RR=0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15), nor the incidence of third- or fourth-degree lacerations (RR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15). No difference was noted in the incidence of instrument delivery (RR=0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08).

Massage means less pain for multigravidas

Massage reduced postpartum perineal pain in multigravidas, according to a questionnaire administered at 3 months in 1 study, to which 376 of 493 women (76%) responded (RR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.02-0.87; NNT=13).3 A subgroup of women who massaged more often than 3.5 times a week had a larger reduction in pain (RR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.79; NNT=11). At 3 months, massage produced no difference in rates of dyspareunia, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine or feces when compared with standard care.

Recommendations

We found no expert or advocacy group guidelines on this topic.

References

1. Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD005123.-

2. Shipman MK, Boniface DR, Tefft ME, et al. Antenatal perineal massage and subsequent perineal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 1997;104:787-791.

3. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:593-600.

4. Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Pinault JJ, et al. Prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy: a pilot study. Birth. 1994;21:20-25.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

John Dame, MD
Jon Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash

Sarah Safranek, MLIS
University of Washington Health Sciences Libraries, Seattle

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 57(7)
Publications
Page Number
480-481
Legacy Keywords
antepartum perineal massage; intrapartum lacerations; pregnancy; vaginal delivery; John Dame MD; Jon Neher MD
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

John Dame, MD
Jon Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash

Sarah Safranek, MLIS
University of Washington Health Sciences Libraries, Seattle

Author and Disclosure Information

John Dame, MD
Jon Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash

Sarah Safranek, MLIS
University of Washington Health Sciences Libraries, Seattle

Article PDF
Article PDF
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Yes—to a point. Antepartum perineal massage reduces both the incidence of perineal trauma requiring suturing and the likelihood of episiotomy in women who have never given birth vaginally. It reduces the incidence of postpartum perineal pain in women who have given birth vaginally. Perineal massage doesn’t reduce the frequency of first- or second-degree lacerations or third- and fourth-degree perineal trauma. (Strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs].)

Clinical commentary

Raise the subject, then let the patient decide
Timothy E. Huber, MD
Oroville, Calif

Perineal massage is relatively easy to describe and do, but its intimate nature can make physicians and patients alike feel uncomfortable. The benefit for primigravid women justifies asking appropriate patients at least an exploratory question or 2 during early and second-trimester visits.

A question such as, “How much do you know about the process of having a vaginal delivery?” often prompts inquiries about pain control, delivery techniques, episiotomy, and tears. These inquiries can provide an opportunity to discuss perineal massage as a safe, effective technique to reduce the chance of an episiotomy, need for suturing, and long-term postpartum pain. Letting the patient make up her own mind can give her more confidence as the big day approaches.

Evidence summary

A systematic review evaluating whether antepartum perineal massage reduced perineal trauma included 3 RCTs with a total of 1941 primagravidas and 493 multigravidas.1 Women were randomized to receive either instruction in perineal massage or no instruction.

Beginning at 34 weeks, women or their partners performed perineal massage for 4 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week,2 or once a day for 10 minutes.3,4 Massage was performed by inserting 1 or 2 fingers 3 to 5 cm into the vagina and sweeping downward and from side to side, using almond oil for lubrication.

 

Birth attendants were blinded to patients’ assignments. All studies evaluated immediate postpartum outcomes; 1 study included a 3-month follow-up questionnaire.3

Massage reduces trauma, but less is more

Massage reduced perineal trauma requiring suturing by 10% among primigravid patients, compared with controls (relative risk [RR]=0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96; number needed to treat [NNT]=14). Subgroup analysis revealed an inverse relationship between reduced trauma and frequency of massage: Primagravidas who massaged fewer than 1.5 times a week showed a 17% reduction (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92; NNT=9), compared with an 8% reduction for women who massaged 1.5 to 3.4 times a week (RR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00; NNT=22) and a statistically insignificant 7% reduction for the group that massaged more than 3.5 times a week (RR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02).

 

 

 

Perineal massage reduced the incidence of episiotomy by 15% among primigravidas compared with controls (RR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; NNT=20); the largest reduction occurred in primagravidas who massaged as often as 1.5 times per week (RR=0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91). This effect was not seen in primagravidas who massaged more often. Multigravid patients didn’t experience a statistically significant reduction in episiotomy.

Perineal massage didn’t affect the overall incidence of first- and second-degree perineal lacerations (first-degree laceration: RR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16; second-degree laceration: RR=0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15), nor the incidence of third- or fourth-degree lacerations (RR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15). No difference was noted in the incidence of instrument delivery (RR=0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08).

Massage means less pain for multigravidas

Massage reduced postpartum perineal pain in multigravidas, according to a questionnaire administered at 3 months in 1 study, to which 376 of 493 women (76%) responded (RR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.02-0.87; NNT=13).3 A subgroup of women who massaged more often than 3.5 times a week had a larger reduction in pain (RR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.79; NNT=11). At 3 months, massage produced no difference in rates of dyspareunia, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine or feces when compared with standard care.

Recommendations

We found no expert or advocacy group guidelines on this topic.

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Yes—to a point. Antepartum perineal massage reduces both the incidence of perineal trauma requiring suturing and the likelihood of episiotomy in women who have never given birth vaginally. It reduces the incidence of postpartum perineal pain in women who have given birth vaginally. Perineal massage doesn’t reduce the frequency of first- or second-degree lacerations or third- and fourth-degree perineal trauma. (Strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs].)

Clinical commentary

Raise the subject, then let the patient decide
Timothy E. Huber, MD
Oroville, Calif

Perineal massage is relatively easy to describe and do, but its intimate nature can make physicians and patients alike feel uncomfortable. The benefit for primigravid women justifies asking appropriate patients at least an exploratory question or 2 during early and second-trimester visits.

A question such as, “How much do you know about the process of having a vaginal delivery?” often prompts inquiries about pain control, delivery techniques, episiotomy, and tears. These inquiries can provide an opportunity to discuss perineal massage as a safe, effective technique to reduce the chance of an episiotomy, need for suturing, and long-term postpartum pain. Letting the patient make up her own mind can give her more confidence as the big day approaches.

Evidence summary

A systematic review evaluating whether antepartum perineal massage reduced perineal trauma included 3 RCTs with a total of 1941 primagravidas and 493 multigravidas.1 Women were randomized to receive either instruction in perineal massage or no instruction.

Beginning at 34 weeks, women or their partners performed perineal massage for 4 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week,2 or once a day for 10 minutes.3,4 Massage was performed by inserting 1 or 2 fingers 3 to 5 cm into the vagina and sweeping downward and from side to side, using almond oil for lubrication.

 

Birth attendants were blinded to patients’ assignments. All studies evaluated immediate postpartum outcomes; 1 study included a 3-month follow-up questionnaire.3

Massage reduces trauma, but less is more

Massage reduced perineal trauma requiring suturing by 10% among primigravid patients, compared with controls (relative risk [RR]=0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96; number needed to treat [NNT]=14). Subgroup analysis revealed an inverse relationship between reduced trauma and frequency of massage: Primagravidas who massaged fewer than 1.5 times a week showed a 17% reduction (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92; NNT=9), compared with an 8% reduction for women who massaged 1.5 to 3.4 times a week (RR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00; NNT=22) and a statistically insignificant 7% reduction for the group that massaged more than 3.5 times a week (RR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02).

 

 

 

Perineal massage reduced the incidence of episiotomy by 15% among primigravidas compared with controls (RR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; NNT=20); the largest reduction occurred in primagravidas who massaged as often as 1.5 times per week (RR=0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91). This effect was not seen in primagravidas who massaged more often. Multigravid patients didn’t experience a statistically significant reduction in episiotomy.

Perineal massage didn’t affect the overall incidence of first- and second-degree perineal lacerations (first-degree laceration: RR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16; second-degree laceration: RR=0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15), nor the incidence of third- or fourth-degree lacerations (RR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15). No difference was noted in the incidence of instrument delivery (RR=0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08).

Massage means less pain for multigravidas

Massage reduced postpartum perineal pain in multigravidas, according to a questionnaire administered at 3 months in 1 study, to which 376 of 493 women (76%) responded (RR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.02-0.87; NNT=13).3 A subgroup of women who massaged more often than 3.5 times a week had a larger reduction in pain (RR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.79; NNT=11). At 3 months, massage produced no difference in rates of dyspareunia, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine or feces when compared with standard care.

Recommendations

We found no expert or advocacy group guidelines on this topic.

References

1. Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD005123.-

2. Shipman MK, Boniface DR, Tefft ME, et al. Antenatal perineal massage and subsequent perineal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 1997;104:787-791.

3. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:593-600.

4. Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Pinault JJ, et al. Prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy: a pilot study. Birth. 1994;21:20-25.

References

1. Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD005123.-

2. Shipman MK, Boniface DR, Tefft ME, et al. Antenatal perineal massage and subsequent perineal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 1997;104:787-791.

3. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:593-600.

4. Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Pinault JJ, et al. Prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy: a pilot study. Birth. 1994;21:20-25.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 57(7)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 57(7)
Page Number
480-481
Page Number
480-481
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Does antepartum perineal massage reduce intrapartum lacerations?
Display Headline
Does antepartum perineal massage reduce intrapartum lacerations?
Legacy Keywords
antepartum perineal massage; intrapartum lacerations; pregnancy; vaginal delivery; John Dame MD; Jon Neher MD
Legacy Keywords
antepartum perineal massage; intrapartum lacerations; pregnancy; vaginal delivery; John Dame MD; Jon Neher MD
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media