A New Integrative Oncology Clinic at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:25

Background

Prostate cancer is a common cancer among US veterans (31.8%). Radiation/chemotherapy effects (dry mouth, fatigue, neuropathy, gastrointestinal) are worsened by hormonal effects (hot flashes, weak bones, sexual dysfunction). Conventional treatments help symptoms (reactive) while integrative oncology proactively prevents them, links complementary with conventional care. Veterans are unfamiliar with integrative services. Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation awarded grant funding to build an Integrative Oncology-Prostate Cancer clinic. Goals: improve surgical outcomes, lessen chemotherapy/radiation side effects, boost morale, optimize post-therapy clinical outcomes over a 1-year period.

Objective

Evidence-based integrative therapies shift our focus from treating disease to treating the whole patient. Empowering veterans to take charge of their health improves health outcomes.

Methods

Identify veterans with prostate cancer and screen for symptoms (ie, anxiety, fatigue, depression, neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, constipation, sexual dysfunction, insomnia). We will perform a personal health inventory (PHI), assess stress with a Perceived Stress Score (PSS), identify the patient’s mission, aspiration, and purpose (MAP). Other measures: PROMIS-10 (measures emotional, spiritual, social support, selfmanagement); OMPRACTICE-instant feedback; HOPE-FACT-spiritual test. Consults: psychology, acupuncture, nutrition, pharmacy, social work, chaplain, creative arts, music, dance, movement, reiki, yoga, qigong, Tai-chi, rehab, pre-habilitation.

Results

Recruitment began in June 2021; we have 37 enlisted patients, 5 battlefield acupuncturists, 1 reiki instructor, 1 hypnotist, 1 dance therapist, 1 massage therapist. Other services are available by referral. Weekly Integrative Oncology meetings: Two 90-minute clinics twice weekly.

Conclusions

Interest in integrative oncology is high. Abundant resources exist. We increased awareness and accessibility. Future plans: Assess program adherence, boost patient satisfaction, and enrolment.

 

 

Publications
Topics
Page Number
S30
Sections

Background

Prostate cancer is a common cancer among US veterans (31.8%). Radiation/chemotherapy effects (dry mouth, fatigue, neuropathy, gastrointestinal) are worsened by hormonal effects (hot flashes, weak bones, sexual dysfunction). Conventional treatments help symptoms (reactive) while integrative oncology proactively prevents them, links complementary with conventional care. Veterans are unfamiliar with integrative services. Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation awarded grant funding to build an Integrative Oncology-Prostate Cancer clinic. Goals: improve surgical outcomes, lessen chemotherapy/radiation side effects, boost morale, optimize post-therapy clinical outcomes over a 1-year period.

Objective

Evidence-based integrative therapies shift our focus from treating disease to treating the whole patient. Empowering veterans to take charge of their health improves health outcomes.

Methods

Identify veterans with prostate cancer and screen for symptoms (ie, anxiety, fatigue, depression, neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, constipation, sexual dysfunction, insomnia). We will perform a personal health inventory (PHI), assess stress with a Perceived Stress Score (PSS), identify the patient’s mission, aspiration, and purpose (MAP). Other measures: PROMIS-10 (measures emotional, spiritual, social support, selfmanagement); OMPRACTICE-instant feedback; HOPE-FACT-spiritual test. Consults: psychology, acupuncture, nutrition, pharmacy, social work, chaplain, creative arts, music, dance, movement, reiki, yoga, qigong, Tai-chi, rehab, pre-habilitation.

Results

Recruitment began in June 2021; we have 37 enlisted patients, 5 battlefield acupuncturists, 1 reiki instructor, 1 hypnotist, 1 dance therapist, 1 massage therapist. Other services are available by referral. Weekly Integrative Oncology meetings: Two 90-minute clinics twice weekly.

Conclusions

Interest in integrative oncology is high. Abundant resources exist. We increased awareness and accessibility. Future plans: Assess program adherence, boost patient satisfaction, and enrolment.

 

 

Background

Prostate cancer is a common cancer among US veterans (31.8%). Radiation/chemotherapy effects (dry mouth, fatigue, neuropathy, gastrointestinal) are worsened by hormonal effects (hot flashes, weak bones, sexual dysfunction). Conventional treatments help symptoms (reactive) while integrative oncology proactively prevents them, links complementary with conventional care. Veterans are unfamiliar with integrative services. Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation awarded grant funding to build an Integrative Oncology-Prostate Cancer clinic. Goals: improve surgical outcomes, lessen chemotherapy/radiation side effects, boost morale, optimize post-therapy clinical outcomes over a 1-year period.

Objective

Evidence-based integrative therapies shift our focus from treating disease to treating the whole patient. Empowering veterans to take charge of their health improves health outcomes.

Methods

Identify veterans with prostate cancer and screen for symptoms (ie, anxiety, fatigue, depression, neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, constipation, sexual dysfunction, insomnia). We will perform a personal health inventory (PHI), assess stress with a Perceived Stress Score (PSS), identify the patient’s mission, aspiration, and purpose (MAP). Other measures: PROMIS-10 (measures emotional, spiritual, social support, selfmanagement); OMPRACTICE-instant feedback; HOPE-FACT-spiritual test. Consults: psychology, acupuncture, nutrition, pharmacy, social work, chaplain, creative arts, music, dance, movement, reiki, yoga, qigong, Tai-chi, rehab, pre-habilitation.

Results

Recruitment began in June 2021; we have 37 enlisted patients, 5 battlefield acupuncturists, 1 reiki instructor, 1 hypnotist, 1 dance therapist, 1 massage therapist. Other services are available by referral. Weekly Integrative Oncology meetings: Two 90-minute clinics twice weekly.

Conclusions

Interest in integrative oncology is high. Abundant resources exist. We increased awareness and accessibility. Future plans: Assess program adherence, boost patient satisfaction, and enrolment.

 

 

Page Number
S30
Page Number
S30
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 09/14/2022 - 19:15
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 09/14/2022 - 19:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 09/14/2022 - 19:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Close to Me: CBOC Infusion Program

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:26

Background

Currently, within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, anticancer therapy infusions and injections are primarily offered at VA medical centers (VAMCs) in urban areas. The time and out-of-pocket expenses related to travel present a barrier to care, often leading veterans to seek cancer care in the community. The Minneapolis VA developed a “Remote Infusion” program that deploys a chemotherapy certified RN to administer anticancer and supportive therapies at surrounding Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). The program expanded in October 2021, and since, they have provided 259 infusions and injections to 145 veterans at 16 CBOCs. These efforts have saved at least 20,000 miles of travel for veterans in the Minneapolis/ St. Cloud catchment area. Building off the success of this program, the National Oncology Program Integrated Project Team has developed the “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program.

Methods

The “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program utilizes VAMCs to compound treatments. Then a chemotherapy certified RN is deployed to the surrounding CBOCs to administer treatments. Veterans eligible for this program must have received and tolerated their first dose of treatment at a VAMC. Medications included in this program have low risk of reaction, short infusion time, and at least 8 hours of drug stability. Treatments include immune check point inhibitors, leuprolide, octreotide, IV fluids, and iron infusions. Additional treatments continue to be evaluated and added. Telehealth modalities are utilized for patient visits with their oncology provider for treatment clearance. An implementation toolkit, including a library of standard operating procedures, note templates, and staffing models, has been developed for VAMCs interested in replicating this program.

Results

The Pittsburgh VAMC launched the first “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program June 8, 2022.

Conclusions

 The “Close to Me” CBOC infusion program optimizes current VA infrastructure and processes to expand access to the world class oncology care VA provides by reducing travel burden for the veterans. Additional areas of novel solutions under development to provide expanded access points to anticancer therapies include mobile infusion units, mobile compounding units, and home administration.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Publications
Topics
Page Number
S23
Sections

Background

Currently, within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, anticancer therapy infusions and injections are primarily offered at VA medical centers (VAMCs) in urban areas. The time and out-of-pocket expenses related to travel present a barrier to care, often leading veterans to seek cancer care in the community. The Minneapolis VA developed a “Remote Infusion” program that deploys a chemotherapy certified RN to administer anticancer and supportive therapies at surrounding Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). The program expanded in October 2021, and since, they have provided 259 infusions and injections to 145 veterans at 16 CBOCs. These efforts have saved at least 20,000 miles of travel for veterans in the Minneapolis/ St. Cloud catchment area. Building off the success of this program, the National Oncology Program Integrated Project Team has developed the “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program.

Methods

The “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program utilizes VAMCs to compound treatments. Then a chemotherapy certified RN is deployed to the surrounding CBOCs to administer treatments. Veterans eligible for this program must have received and tolerated their first dose of treatment at a VAMC. Medications included in this program have low risk of reaction, short infusion time, and at least 8 hours of drug stability. Treatments include immune check point inhibitors, leuprolide, octreotide, IV fluids, and iron infusions. Additional treatments continue to be evaluated and added. Telehealth modalities are utilized for patient visits with their oncology provider for treatment clearance. An implementation toolkit, including a library of standard operating procedures, note templates, and staffing models, has been developed for VAMCs interested in replicating this program.

Results

The Pittsburgh VAMC launched the first “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program June 8, 2022.

Conclusions

 The “Close to Me” CBOC infusion program optimizes current VA infrastructure and processes to expand access to the world class oncology care VA provides by reducing travel burden for the veterans. Additional areas of novel solutions under development to provide expanded access points to anticancer therapies include mobile infusion units, mobile compounding units, and home administration.

Background

Currently, within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, anticancer therapy infusions and injections are primarily offered at VA medical centers (VAMCs) in urban areas. The time and out-of-pocket expenses related to travel present a barrier to care, often leading veterans to seek cancer care in the community. The Minneapolis VA developed a “Remote Infusion” program that deploys a chemotherapy certified RN to administer anticancer and supportive therapies at surrounding Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). The program expanded in October 2021, and since, they have provided 259 infusions and injections to 145 veterans at 16 CBOCs. These efforts have saved at least 20,000 miles of travel for veterans in the Minneapolis/ St. Cloud catchment area. Building off the success of this program, the National Oncology Program Integrated Project Team has developed the “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program.

Methods

The “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program utilizes VAMCs to compound treatments. Then a chemotherapy certified RN is deployed to the surrounding CBOCs to administer treatments. Veterans eligible for this program must have received and tolerated their first dose of treatment at a VAMC. Medications included in this program have low risk of reaction, short infusion time, and at least 8 hours of drug stability. Treatments include immune check point inhibitors, leuprolide, octreotide, IV fluids, and iron infusions. Additional treatments continue to be evaluated and added. Telehealth modalities are utilized for patient visits with their oncology provider for treatment clearance. An implementation toolkit, including a library of standard operating procedures, note templates, and staffing models, has been developed for VAMCs interested in replicating this program.

Results

The Pittsburgh VAMC launched the first “Close to Me” CBOC Infusion Program June 8, 2022.

Conclusions

 The “Close to Me” CBOC infusion program optimizes current VA infrastructure and processes to expand access to the world class oncology care VA provides by reducing travel burden for the veterans. Additional areas of novel solutions under development to provide expanded access points to anticancer therapies include mobile infusion units, mobile compounding units, and home administration.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Page Number
S23
Page Number
S23
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 09/02/2022 - 10:15
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 09/02/2022 - 10:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 09/02/2022 - 10:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Creation of a National Virtual Tumor Board Through the National TeleOncology Service

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:26

Background

There is unequal access to subspecialty oncology expertise across the Veterans Affairs (VA) network. To address this need, the VA established National TeleOncology (NTO), which provides multiple virtual services (asynchronous [electronic consult] and synchronous [phone, video to home, video to facility]) to over 20 VA sites. Beyond these care modalities, a virtual tumor board was conceived to provide a forum for multidisciplinary review of patient cases. We describe the creation of the first NTO virtual tumor board, encompassing malignant hematology diagnoses.

Observations

Tumor boards are considered a standard of care. While challenging to quantify nationally, multiple single institution experiences have established the importance of tumor boards across different measures. A panel of stakeholders were convened to discuss the creation of a virtual tumor board. Best practices and standard operating procedures were created based on guidance from relevant literature and internal VA experience. Participants from specialties including medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, transplant, and palliative care were engaged from eight different VA medical centers across the nation. On March 2, 2022, the initial tumor board was held allowing for synchronous virtual review of patient pathology and imaging. Thus far 6 tumor boards have been convened, reviewing 11 patients originating from 6 different VA sites.

Results

A participant survey was conducted after 4 sessions, which indicated that all who completed the survey (n = 9) found the sessions beneficial or somewhat beneficial, and 55% found the sessions highly applicable to their practice. The most recent tumor board had 33 participants (physicians, nurses, advanced practice practitioners, and pharmacists).

Conclusions

The establishment of a national VA tumor board represents a novel approach to the review of oncology cases across the VA network. The goal of this tumor board is to leverage the diverse knowledge base that exists within the VA to deliver equitable care regardless of veteran location. Along with improving our general understanding of tumor board application, we believe that the NTO tumor board establishes a unique forum for additional tumor types, continued medical education opportunities, and the review of VA clinical trial opportunities.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Publications
Topics
Sections

Background

There is unequal access to subspecialty oncology expertise across the Veterans Affairs (VA) network. To address this need, the VA established National TeleOncology (NTO), which provides multiple virtual services (asynchronous [electronic consult] and synchronous [phone, video to home, video to facility]) to over 20 VA sites. Beyond these care modalities, a virtual tumor board was conceived to provide a forum for multidisciplinary review of patient cases. We describe the creation of the first NTO virtual tumor board, encompassing malignant hematology diagnoses.

Observations

Tumor boards are considered a standard of care. While challenging to quantify nationally, multiple single institution experiences have established the importance of tumor boards across different measures. A panel of stakeholders were convened to discuss the creation of a virtual tumor board. Best practices and standard operating procedures were created based on guidance from relevant literature and internal VA experience. Participants from specialties including medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, transplant, and palliative care were engaged from eight different VA medical centers across the nation. On March 2, 2022, the initial tumor board was held allowing for synchronous virtual review of patient pathology and imaging. Thus far 6 tumor boards have been convened, reviewing 11 patients originating from 6 different VA sites.

Results

A participant survey was conducted after 4 sessions, which indicated that all who completed the survey (n = 9) found the sessions beneficial or somewhat beneficial, and 55% found the sessions highly applicable to their practice. The most recent tumor board had 33 participants (physicians, nurses, advanced practice practitioners, and pharmacists).

Conclusions

The establishment of a national VA tumor board represents a novel approach to the review of oncology cases across the VA network. The goal of this tumor board is to leverage the diverse knowledge base that exists within the VA to deliver equitable care regardless of veteran location. Along with improving our general understanding of tumor board application, we believe that the NTO tumor board establishes a unique forum for additional tumor types, continued medical education opportunities, and the review of VA clinical trial opportunities.

Background

There is unequal access to subspecialty oncology expertise across the Veterans Affairs (VA) network. To address this need, the VA established National TeleOncology (NTO), which provides multiple virtual services (asynchronous [electronic consult] and synchronous [phone, video to home, video to facility]) to over 20 VA sites. Beyond these care modalities, a virtual tumor board was conceived to provide a forum for multidisciplinary review of patient cases. We describe the creation of the first NTO virtual tumor board, encompassing malignant hematology diagnoses.

Observations

Tumor boards are considered a standard of care. While challenging to quantify nationally, multiple single institution experiences have established the importance of tumor boards across different measures. A panel of stakeholders were convened to discuss the creation of a virtual tumor board. Best practices and standard operating procedures were created based on guidance from relevant literature and internal VA experience. Participants from specialties including medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, transplant, and palliative care were engaged from eight different VA medical centers across the nation. On March 2, 2022, the initial tumor board was held allowing for synchronous virtual review of patient pathology and imaging. Thus far 6 tumor boards have been convened, reviewing 11 patients originating from 6 different VA sites.

Results

A participant survey was conducted after 4 sessions, which indicated that all who completed the survey (n = 9) found the sessions beneficial or somewhat beneficial, and 55% found the sessions highly applicable to their practice. The most recent tumor board had 33 participants (physicians, nurses, advanced practice practitioners, and pharmacists).

Conclusions

The establishment of a national VA tumor board represents a novel approach to the review of oncology cases across the VA network. The goal of this tumor board is to leverage the diverse knowledge base that exists within the VA to deliver equitable care regardless of veteran location. Along with improving our general understanding of tumor board application, we believe that the NTO tumor board establishes a unique forum for additional tumor types, continued medical education opportunities, and the review of VA clinical trial opportunities.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 39(4)s
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:15
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Development of an Informatics Infrastructure and Frontend Dashboard for Monitoring Clinical Operations of the National TeleOncology Service

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:27

Background

Since inception, the Veterans Affairs (VA) National TeleOncology (NTO) service has monitored clinical operations through data tools produced by the Veterans Health Administration Support Service Center (VSSC). Unfortunately, pertinent data are spread across multiple reports, making it difficult to continually harmonize needed information. Further, the VSSC does not account for NTO’s hub and spoke clinical model, leading to inaccuracies when attempting to analyze unique encounters. To address these challenges, NTO partnered with the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS) to develop an informatics architecture and frontend NTO Clinical Operations Dashboard (NCOD). Here, we summarize our dashboard development process and the finalized key reporting components of the NCOD.

Methods

The VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) serves as the primary data source for the NCOD. SQL Server Integration Services was used to build the backend data architecture. Data from the CDW were isolated into a staging data mart for reporting purposes using an extract, transform, load (ETL) approach. The frontend user interface was developed using Power BI. We used a participatory approach1 in determining reporting requirements. Stakeholders included the IDEAS dashboard development team and potential end users from NTO, including leadership, program managers, support assistants, and telehealth coordinators.

Results

The NCOD ETL is scheduled to refresh the data nightly to provide end users with a near real-time experience. The NCOD is comprised of the following four data views: clinic availability, team productivity, patient summary, and encounter summary. The clinic availability view summarizes clinic capacity, no shows, overbookings, and percent utilization. Relative value unit- based productivity is summarized in the team productivity view. The patient summary view presents aggregated data for veterans served by NTO, including geographic distribution, with patient-level drill down displaying demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment history. Lastly, the encounter view displays utilization trends by modality, while accurately accounting for the hub and spoke clinical model.

Conclusions

An informatics architecture and frontend information display that is capable of synthesizing EHR data into a consumable format has been pivotal in obtaining accurate and timely insight into the demand and capacity of services provided by NTO.

References
  1. Esquer Rochin MA, Gutierrez-Garcia JO, Rosales JH, Rodriguez LF. Design and evaluation of a dashboard to support the comprehension of the progression.
Publications
Topics
Sections

Background

Since inception, the Veterans Affairs (VA) National TeleOncology (NTO) service has monitored clinical operations through data tools produced by the Veterans Health Administration Support Service Center (VSSC). Unfortunately, pertinent data are spread across multiple reports, making it difficult to continually harmonize needed information. Further, the VSSC does not account for NTO’s hub and spoke clinical model, leading to inaccuracies when attempting to analyze unique encounters. To address these challenges, NTO partnered with the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS) to develop an informatics architecture and frontend NTO Clinical Operations Dashboard (NCOD). Here, we summarize our dashboard development process and the finalized key reporting components of the NCOD.

Methods

The VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) serves as the primary data source for the NCOD. SQL Server Integration Services was used to build the backend data architecture. Data from the CDW were isolated into a staging data mart for reporting purposes using an extract, transform, load (ETL) approach. The frontend user interface was developed using Power BI. We used a participatory approach1 in determining reporting requirements. Stakeholders included the IDEAS dashboard development team and potential end users from NTO, including leadership, program managers, support assistants, and telehealth coordinators.

Results

The NCOD ETL is scheduled to refresh the data nightly to provide end users with a near real-time experience. The NCOD is comprised of the following four data views: clinic availability, team productivity, patient summary, and encounter summary. The clinic availability view summarizes clinic capacity, no shows, overbookings, and percent utilization. Relative value unit- based productivity is summarized in the team productivity view. The patient summary view presents aggregated data for veterans served by NTO, including geographic distribution, with patient-level drill down displaying demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment history. Lastly, the encounter view displays utilization trends by modality, while accurately accounting for the hub and spoke clinical model.

Conclusions

An informatics architecture and frontend information display that is capable of synthesizing EHR data into a consumable format has been pivotal in obtaining accurate and timely insight into the demand and capacity of services provided by NTO.

Background

Since inception, the Veterans Affairs (VA) National TeleOncology (NTO) service has monitored clinical operations through data tools produced by the Veterans Health Administration Support Service Center (VSSC). Unfortunately, pertinent data are spread across multiple reports, making it difficult to continually harmonize needed information. Further, the VSSC does not account for NTO’s hub and spoke clinical model, leading to inaccuracies when attempting to analyze unique encounters. To address these challenges, NTO partnered with the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS) to develop an informatics architecture and frontend NTO Clinical Operations Dashboard (NCOD). Here, we summarize our dashboard development process and the finalized key reporting components of the NCOD.

Methods

The VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) serves as the primary data source for the NCOD. SQL Server Integration Services was used to build the backend data architecture. Data from the CDW were isolated into a staging data mart for reporting purposes using an extract, transform, load (ETL) approach. The frontend user interface was developed using Power BI. We used a participatory approach1 in determining reporting requirements. Stakeholders included the IDEAS dashboard development team and potential end users from NTO, including leadership, program managers, support assistants, and telehealth coordinators.

Results

The NCOD ETL is scheduled to refresh the data nightly to provide end users with a near real-time experience. The NCOD is comprised of the following four data views: clinic availability, team productivity, patient summary, and encounter summary. The clinic availability view summarizes clinic capacity, no shows, overbookings, and percent utilization. Relative value unit- based productivity is summarized in the team productivity view. The patient summary view presents aggregated data for veterans served by NTO, including geographic distribution, with patient-level drill down displaying demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment history. Lastly, the encounter view displays utilization trends by modality, while accurately accounting for the hub and spoke clinical model.

Conclusions

An informatics architecture and frontend information display that is capable of synthesizing EHR data into a consumable format has been pivotal in obtaining accurate and timely insight into the demand and capacity of services provided by NTO.

References
  1. Esquer Rochin MA, Gutierrez-Garcia JO, Rosales JH, Rodriguez LF. Design and evaluation of a dashboard to support the comprehension of the progression.
References
  1. Esquer Rochin MA, Gutierrez-Garcia JO, Rosales JH, Rodriguez LF. Design and evaluation of a dashboard to support the comprehension of the progression.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:00
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 08/31/2022 - 16:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article