Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/20/2017 - 11:20
Display Headline
In reply: Iron therapy and infection

In Reply: We agree that iron therapy is different than iron stores, but iron therapy should be started on the basis of depleted iron stores; otherwise, it is unjustifiable. We also agree that elevated iron stores are dangerous in the setting of infection, more than iron therapy itself. This is really an unproven theory. Most studies that showed worse outcomes of iron therapy found that elevated ferritin is a risk factor.1 The problem, as we outlined in our paper, is that most serum markers of iron are unreliable in case of inflammation or infection or in the critically ill.2 Evaluation of bone marrow stores is probably the most accurate.3

References
  1. Cavill I. Intravenous iron as adjuvant therapy: a two-edged sword? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18(suppl 8):viii24–viii28.
  2. Pieracci FM, Barie PS. Diagnosis and management of iron-related anemias in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1898–1905.
  3. Wish JB. Assessing iron status: beyond serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(suppl 1):S4–S8.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ehab Daoud, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
355
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ehab Daoud, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Author and Disclosure Information

Ehab Daoud, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Reply: We agree that iron therapy is different than iron stores, but iron therapy should be started on the basis of depleted iron stores; otherwise, it is unjustifiable. We also agree that elevated iron stores are dangerous in the setting of infection, more than iron therapy itself. This is really an unproven theory. Most studies that showed worse outcomes of iron therapy found that elevated ferritin is a risk factor.1 The problem, as we outlined in our paper, is that most serum markers of iron are unreliable in case of inflammation or infection or in the critically ill.2 Evaluation of bone marrow stores is probably the most accurate.3

In Reply: We agree that iron therapy is different than iron stores, but iron therapy should be started on the basis of depleted iron stores; otherwise, it is unjustifiable. We also agree that elevated iron stores are dangerous in the setting of infection, more than iron therapy itself. This is really an unproven theory. Most studies that showed worse outcomes of iron therapy found that elevated ferritin is a risk factor.1 The problem, as we outlined in our paper, is that most serum markers of iron are unreliable in case of inflammation or infection or in the critically ill.2 Evaluation of bone marrow stores is probably the most accurate.3

References
  1. Cavill I. Intravenous iron as adjuvant therapy: a two-edged sword? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18(suppl 8):viii24–viii28.
  2. Pieracci FM, Barie PS. Diagnosis and management of iron-related anemias in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1898–1905.
  3. Wish JB. Assessing iron status: beyond serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(suppl 1):S4–S8.
References
  1. Cavill I. Intravenous iron as adjuvant therapy: a two-edged sword? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18(suppl 8):viii24–viii28.
  2. Pieracci FM, Barie PS. Diagnosis and management of iron-related anemias in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1898–1905.
  3. Wish JB. Assessing iron status: beyond serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(suppl 1):S4–S8.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Page Number
355
Page Number
355
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In reply: Iron therapy and infection
Display Headline
In reply: Iron therapy and infection
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media