User login
Expert Commentary
METHODS Investigators randomized 57 postmenopausal, hysterectomized women to receive oral (0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen [CEE]; n=27) or vaginal (0.625 mg of CEE per 1 g of vaginal cream; n=30) estrogen once daily.
Vaginal vascularization and sexual function were assessed through a variety of measures, including serum estradiol, introital color Doppler ultrasound, and personal interviews.
RESULTS After 3 months of treatment, both groups of women had significant increases in the number of vaginal vessels, and “marked” decreases in the pulsatility index.
Unopposed estrogen has its own benefits, risks
In hysterectomized postmenopausal women, unopposed estrogen has been shown to relieve menopausal symptoms and protect against bone loss and osteoporosis-related fractures without increasing the risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease.
Don’t be fooled by serum levels
Measurements of serum estradiol levels in women who are taking CEE either orally or vaginally do not truly reflect the total estrogenic load of these patients, because the bulk of estrogen in CEE is estrone sulfate with several equine estrogenic compounds that have activity not reflected by serum estradiol. Consequently, the estrogenicity of the women in this study was not accurately evaluated through the serum estradiol measurements.
Vaginal estrogen is not “topical”
Moreover, the authors refer to the vaginal group as receiving “topical” estrogen—another misconception. Systemic absorption of vaginal estrogen is probably greater and more rapid than with the oral route. It is no surprise that vaginal administration was associated with greater improvement of both dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, because the vagina is exposed to a greater concentration of estrogen when it is administered vaginally than when it is given orally. With oral administration, a significant amount of estrogen is metabolized by the liver, and a much lower dose of estrogen reaches the vaginal epithelium.
Oral estrogen can reduce libido
The lack of improved libido with the oral preparation is not surprising. In fact, some women may experience a decrease in libido with orally administered estrogen because of the associated increases in SHBG. With vaginal administration, SHBG levels are not increased, and sexual desire may improve, especially when vaginal lubrication is improved.
Does either form affect sexual function? Unfortunately, this study was not long enough or sufficiently powered to adequately assess sexual function.
Systemic absorption is high even with vaginal route
The same dose of CEE yields slightly greater benefits to vaginal health and function when it is administered vaginally. When estrogen is given vaginally, systemic absorption is significant—and may be greater than with the oral route.
Indications and contraindications of oral estrogen, consequently, also apply to vaginal administration.
1. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.
2. Straczek C, Oger E, Yon de Jonage-Canonico MB, et al. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration. Circulation. 2005;112:3495-3500.
Expert Commentary
METHODS Investigators randomized 57 postmenopausal, hysterectomized women to receive oral (0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen [CEE]; n=27) or vaginal (0.625 mg of CEE per 1 g of vaginal cream; n=30) estrogen once daily.
Vaginal vascularization and sexual function were assessed through a variety of measures, including serum estradiol, introital color Doppler ultrasound, and personal interviews.
RESULTS After 3 months of treatment, both groups of women had significant increases in the number of vaginal vessels, and “marked” decreases in the pulsatility index.
Unopposed estrogen has its own benefits, risks
In hysterectomized postmenopausal women, unopposed estrogen has been shown to relieve menopausal symptoms and protect against bone loss and osteoporosis-related fractures without increasing the risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease.
Don’t be fooled by serum levels
Measurements of serum estradiol levels in women who are taking CEE either orally or vaginally do not truly reflect the total estrogenic load of these patients, because the bulk of estrogen in CEE is estrone sulfate with several equine estrogenic compounds that have activity not reflected by serum estradiol. Consequently, the estrogenicity of the women in this study was not accurately evaluated through the serum estradiol measurements.
Vaginal estrogen is not “topical”
Moreover, the authors refer to the vaginal group as receiving “topical” estrogen—another misconception. Systemic absorption of vaginal estrogen is probably greater and more rapid than with the oral route. It is no surprise that vaginal administration was associated with greater improvement of both dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, because the vagina is exposed to a greater concentration of estrogen when it is administered vaginally than when it is given orally. With oral administration, a significant amount of estrogen is metabolized by the liver, and a much lower dose of estrogen reaches the vaginal epithelium.
Oral estrogen can reduce libido
The lack of improved libido with the oral preparation is not surprising. In fact, some women may experience a decrease in libido with orally administered estrogen because of the associated increases in SHBG. With vaginal administration, SHBG levels are not increased, and sexual desire may improve, especially when vaginal lubrication is improved.
Does either form affect sexual function? Unfortunately, this study was not long enough or sufficiently powered to adequately assess sexual function.
Systemic absorption is high even with vaginal route
The same dose of CEE yields slightly greater benefits to vaginal health and function when it is administered vaginally. When estrogen is given vaginally, systemic absorption is significant—and may be greater than with the oral route.
Indications and contraindications of oral estrogen, consequently, also apply to vaginal administration.
Expert Commentary
METHODS Investigators randomized 57 postmenopausal, hysterectomized women to receive oral (0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen [CEE]; n=27) or vaginal (0.625 mg of CEE per 1 g of vaginal cream; n=30) estrogen once daily.
Vaginal vascularization and sexual function were assessed through a variety of measures, including serum estradiol, introital color Doppler ultrasound, and personal interviews.
RESULTS After 3 months of treatment, both groups of women had significant increases in the number of vaginal vessels, and “marked” decreases in the pulsatility index.
Unopposed estrogen has its own benefits, risks
In hysterectomized postmenopausal women, unopposed estrogen has been shown to relieve menopausal symptoms and protect against bone loss and osteoporosis-related fractures without increasing the risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease.
Don’t be fooled by serum levels
Measurements of serum estradiol levels in women who are taking CEE either orally or vaginally do not truly reflect the total estrogenic load of these patients, because the bulk of estrogen in CEE is estrone sulfate with several equine estrogenic compounds that have activity not reflected by serum estradiol. Consequently, the estrogenicity of the women in this study was not accurately evaluated through the serum estradiol measurements.
Vaginal estrogen is not “topical”
Moreover, the authors refer to the vaginal group as receiving “topical” estrogen—another misconception. Systemic absorption of vaginal estrogen is probably greater and more rapid than with the oral route. It is no surprise that vaginal administration was associated with greater improvement of both dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, because the vagina is exposed to a greater concentration of estrogen when it is administered vaginally than when it is given orally. With oral administration, a significant amount of estrogen is metabolized by the liver, and a much lower dose of estrogen reaches the vaginal epithelium.
Oral estrogen can reduce libido
The lack of improved libido with the oral preparation is not surprising. In fact, some women may experience a decrease in libido with orally administered estrogen because of the associated increases in SHBG. With vaginal administration, SHBG levels are not increased, and sexual desire may improve, especially when vaginal lubrication is improved.
Does either form affect sexual function? Unfortunately, this study was not long enough or sufficiently powered to adequately assess sexual function.
Systemic absorption is high even with vaginal route
The same dose of CEE yields slightly greater benefits to vaginal health and function when it is administered vaginally. When estrogen is given vaginally, systemic absorption is significant—and may be greater than with the oral route.
Indications and contraindications of oral estrogen, consequently, also apply to vaginal administration.
1. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.
2. Straczek C, Oger E, Yon de Jonage-Canonico MB, et al. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration. Circulation. 2005;112:3495-3500.
1. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.
2. Straczek C, Oger E, Yon de Jonage-Canonico MB, et al. For the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Group. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration. Circulation. 2005;112:3495-3500.