What nonpharmacological treatments are effective against common nongenital warts?

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:17
Display Headline
What nonpharmacological treatments are effective against common nongenital warts?
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Cryotherapy has similar cure rates to topical salicylate (a pharmacologic therapy) for non-genital common warts (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on systemic review of variable quality randomized trials). Duct tape may be equivalent to cryotherapy (SOR: B, based on a single randomized trial). CO2 laser, photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and Er:Yag laser therapies may also be effective for recalcitrant warts (SOR: C, based on observational cohort studies).

CLINICAL COMMENTARY

With high spontaneous cure rates, communication and individualized treatment remain the cornerstones
Sabina Diehr, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

When I was 6 years old, my grandfather—a country doctor in rural Switzerland—announced that the next day he was going to burn off the 3 warts on my right knee. Terrified, I consulted anyone who would listen. It was the advice of the old woman next door that resulted in a complete cure by the following morning: find a slug and let it slither across your warts from right to left 3 times!

Does slug slime have antiviral properties? Does fear stimulate the immune system? Is perception of need linked to terror of treatment? As long as we still recommend everything from burning and freezing, to duct tape and beetle juice, it is clear that the ideal treatment of warts still eludes us. With spontaneous cure rates similar to those following treatment, excellent communication and an individualized treatment plan for each patient will remain the cornerstone of this clinical challenge.

 

Evidence summary

The evaluation of treatments of nongenital warts is confounded by the propensity of simple warts to disappear spontaneously. Approximately two thirds of warts resolved without therapy over a 2-year period, according to 1 study in an institutional population.1 Since adverse effects from treatment, such as pain and scarring, can occur, patients should be educated as to options of therapy (or no therapy).2

Seventeen studies of cryotherapy with between 30 and 400 patients show cure rates ranging from 29% to 87%, although most did not have placebo arms. Pooled data from 69 patients in 2 small studies did not show a benefit between the cryotherapy and nontreatment arms,3 although there were very low cure rates from cryotherapy in 1 study and high spontaneous remission rates in the other. Longer freeze times seem to improve cryotherapy cure rates but also cause increased blistering and pain.4

One randomized controlled trial of 61 patients showed cure rates of 85% with duct tape vs 60% with cryotherapy.5 Duct tape therapy had the advantages of reduced cost and less pain.

Although pulsed dye laser has efficacy in various studies, no evidence favors it over cryotherapy or cantharidin.6 Treatment with CO2 laser and Er:Yag laser had an efficacy of 52% to 100%. However, many of these studies were small, poorly randomized, and had no placebo control. The potential hazard of aerosolized virus particles from these therapies has not been evaluated.7

Two recent reviews also found that cryotherapy is similar in efficacy to salicylic acid, and reported that other nonpharmacologic treatments lack evidence.2,8

Recommendations from others

The American Academy of Dermatology states that “in children, warts can disappear without treatment over a period of several months to several years. However, warts that are bothersome, painful, or rapidly multiplying should be treated.”9 Nonpharmacologic treatments recommended include cryotherapy, electrosurgery, “cutting,” and lasers.

References

1. Massing AM, Epstein WL. Natural history of warts. A two-year study. Arch Dermatol 1963;87:306-310.

2. Bacelieri R, Johnson SM. Cutaneous warts: an evidence-based approach to therapy. Am Fam Physician 2005;72:647-652.

3. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling JC, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD001781.-

4. Connolly M, Bazmi K, O’Connell M, Lyons JF, Bourke JF. Cryotherapy of viral warts: a sustained 10-s freeze is more effective than the traditional method. Br J Dematol 2001;2001(145):554-557.

5. Focht DR, 3rd, Spicer C, Fairchok MP. The efficacy of duct tape vs cryotherapy in the treatment of verruca vulgaris (the common wart). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:971-974.

6. Robson KJ, Cunningham NM, Kruzan KL, et al. Pulsed-dye laser versus conventional therapy in the treatment of warts: a prospective randomized trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:275-280.

7. Sloan K, Haberman H, Lynde CW. Carbon dioxide laser-treatment of resistant verrucae vulgaris: retrospective analysis. J Cutan Med Surg. 1998;2:142-145.

8. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling J, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325:461.-

9. Warts. Public Resource Center [website], American Academy of Dermatology. Available at: www.aad.org/public/publications/pamphlets/Warts.htm. Accessed on August 3, 2006.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Holly Abernethy, MD
Charles Cho, DO
Anne DeLanoy, MD
Omar Khan, MD
William J. Kerns, MD
Shenandoah Valley Family Practice Residency, Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Front Royal, Va

Karen Knight, MSLS
University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 55(9)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
801-802
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Holly Abernethy, MD
Charles Cho, DO
Anne DeLanoy, MD
Omar Khan, MD
William J. Kerns, MD
Shenandoah Valley Family Practice Residency, Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Front Royal, Va

Karen Knight, MSLS
University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Author and Disclosure Information

Holly Abernethy, MD
Charles Cho, DO
Anne DeLanoy, MD
Omar Khan, MD
William J. Kerns, MD
Shenandoah Valley Family Practice Residency, Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Front Royal, Va

Karen Knight, MSLS
University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Article PDF
Article PDF
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Cryotherapy has similar cure rates to topical salicylate (a pharmacologic therapy) for non-genital common warts (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on systemic review of variable quality randomized trials). Duct tape may be equivalent to cryotherapy (SOR: B, based on a single randomized trial). CO2 laser, photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and Er:Yag laser therapies may also be effective for recalcitrant warts (SOR: C, based on observational cohort studies).

CLINICAL COMMENTARY

With high spontaneous cure rates, communication and individualized treatment remain the cornerstones
Sabina Diehr, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

When I was 6 years old, my grandfather—a country doctor in rural Switzerland—announced that the next day he was going to burn off the 3 warts on my right knee. Terrified, I consulted anyone who would listen. It was the advice of the old woman next door that resulted in a complete cure by the following morning: find a slug and let it slither across your warts from right to left 3 times!

Does slug slime have antiviral properties? Does fear stimulate the immune system? Is perception of need linked to terror of treatment? As long as we still recommend everything from burning and freezing, to duct tape and beetle juice, it is clear that the ideal treatment of warts still eludes us. With spontaneous cure rates similar to those following treatment, excellent communication and an individualized treatment plan for each patient will remain the cornerstone of this clinical challenge.

 

Evidence summary

The evaluation of treatments of nongenital warts is confounded by the propensity of simple warts to disappear spontaneously. Approximately two thirds of warts resolved without therapy over a 2-year period, according to 1 study in an institutional population.1 Since adverse effects from treatment, such as pain and scarring, can occur, patients should be educated as to options of therapy (or no therapy).2

Seventeen studies of cryotherapy with between 30 and 400 patients show cure rates ranging from 29% to 87%, although most did not have placebo arms. Pooled data from 69 patients in 2 small studies did not show a benefit between the cryotherapy and nontreatment arms,3 although there were very low cure rates from cryotherapy in 1 study and high spontaneous remission rates in the other. Longer freeze times seem to improve cryotherapy cure rates but also cause increased blistering and pain.4

One randomized controlled trial of 61 patients showed cure rates of 85% with duct tape vs 60% with cryotherapy.5 Duct tape therapy had the advantages of reduced cost and less pain.

Although pulsed dye laser has efficacy in various studies, no evidence favors it over cryotherapy or cantharidin.6 Treatment with CO2 laser and Er:Yag laser had an efficacy of 52% to 100%. However, many of these studies were small, poorly randomized, and had no placebo control. The potential hazard of aerosolized virus particles from these therapies has not been evaluated.7

Two recent reviews also found that cryotherapy is similar in efficacy to salicylic acid, and reported that other nonpharmacologic treatments lack evidence.2,8

Recommendations from others

The American Academy of Dermatology states that “in children, warts can disappear without treatment over a period of several months to several years. However, warts that are bothersome, painful, or rapidly multiplying should be treated.”9 Nonpharmacologic treatments recommended include cryotherapy, electrosurgery, “cutting,” and lasers.

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Cryotherapy has similar cure rates to topical salicylate (a pharmacologic therapy) for non-genital common warts (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on systemic review of variable quality randomized trials). Duct tape may be equivalent to cryotherapy (SOR: B, based on a single randomized trial). CO2 laser, photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and Er:Yag laser therapies may also be effective for recalcitrant warts (SOR: C, based on observational cohort studies).

CLINICAL COMMENTARY

With high spontaneous cure rates, communication and individualized treatment remain the cornerstones
Sabina Diehr, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

When I was 6 years old, my grandfather—a country doctor in rural Switzerland—announced that the next day he was going to burn off the 3 warts on my right knee. Terrified, I consulted anyone who would listen. It was the advice of the old woman next door that resulted in a complete cure by the following morning: find a slug and let it slither across your warts from right to left 3 times!

Does slug slime have antiviral properties? Does fear stimulate the immune system? Is perception of need linked to terror of treatment? As long as we still recommend everything from burning and freezing, to duct tape and beetle juice, it is clear that the ideal treatment of warts still eludes us. With spontaneous cure rates similar to those following treatment, excellent communication and an individualized treatment plan for each patient will remain the cornerstone of this clinical challenge.

 

Evidence summary

The evaluation of treatments of nongenital warts is confounded by the propensity of simple warts to disappear spontaneously. Approximately two thirds of warts resolved without therapy over a 2-year period, according to 1 study in an institutional population.1 Since adverse effects from treatment, such as pain and scarring, can occur, patients should be educated as to options of therapy (or no therapy).2

Seventeen studies of cryotherapy with between 30 and 400 patients show cure rates ranging from 29% to 87%, although most did not have placebo arms. Pooled data from 69 patients in 2 small studies did not show a benefit between the cryotherapy and nontreatment arms,3 although there were very low cure rates from cryotherapy in 1 study and high spontaneous remission rates in the other. Longer freeze times seem to improve cryotherapy cure rates but also cause increased blistering and pain.4

One randomized controlled trial of 61 patients showed cure rates of 85% with duct tape vs 60% with cryotherapy.5 Duct tape therapy had the advantages of reduced cost and less pain.

Although pulsed dye laser has efficacy in various studies, no evidence favors it over cryotherapy or cantharidin.6 Treatment with CO2 laser and Er:Yag laser had an efficacy of 52% to 100%. However, many of these studies were small, poorly randomized, and had no placebo control. The potential hazard of aerosolized virus particles from these therapies has not been evaluated.7

Two recent reviews also found that cryotherapy is similar in efficacy to salicylic acid, and reported that other nonpharmacologic treatments lack evidence.2,8

Recommendations from others

The American Academy of Dermatology states that “in children, warts can disappear without treatment over a period of several months to several years. However, warts that are bothersome, painful, or rapidly multiplying should be treated.”9 Nonpharmacologic treatments recommended include cryotherapy, electrosurgery, “cutting,” and lasers.

References

1. Massing AM, Epstein WL. Natural history of warts. A two-year study. Arch Dermatol 1963;87:306-310.

2. Bacelieri R, Johnson SM. Cutaneous warts: an evidence-based approach to therapy. Am Fam Physician 2005;72:647-652.

3. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling JC, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD001781.-

4. Connolly M, Bazmi K, O’Connell M, Lyons JF, Bourke JF. Cryotherapy of viral warts: a sustained 10-s freeze is more effective than the traditional method. Br J Dematol 2001;2001(145):554-557.

5. Focht DR, 3rd, Spicer C, Fairchok MP. The efficacy of duct tape vs cryotherapy in the treatment of verruca vulgaris (the common wart). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:971-974.

6. Robson KJ, Cunningham NM, Kruzan KL, et al. Pulsed-dye laser versus conventional therapy in the treatment of warts: a prospective randomized trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:275-280.

7. Sloan K, Haberman H, Lynde CW. Carbon dioxide laser-treatment of resistant verrucae vulgaris: retrospective analysis. J Cutan Med Surg. 1998;2:142-145.

8. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling J, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325:461.-

9. Warts. Public Resource Center [website], American Academy of Dermatology. Available at: www.aad.org/public/publications/pamphlets/Warts.htm. Accessed on August 3, 2006.

References

1. Massing AM, Epstein WL. Natural history of warts. A two-year study. Arch Dermatol 1963;87:306-310.

2. Bacelieri R, Johnson SM. Cutaneous warts: an evidence-based approach to therapy. Am Fam Physician 2005;72:647-652.

3. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling JC, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD001781.-

4. Connolly M, Bazmi K, O’Connell M, Lyons JF, Bourke JF. Cryotherapy of viral warts: a sustained 10-s freeze is more effective than the traditional method. Br J Dematol 2001;2001(145):554-557.

5. Focht DR, 3rd, Spicer C, Fairchok MP. The efficacy of duct tape vs cryotherapy in the treatment of verruca vulgaris (the common wart). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:971-974.

6. Robson KJ, Cunningham NM, Kruzan KL, et al. Pulsed-dye laser versus conventional therapy in the treatment of warts: a prospective randomized trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:275-280.

7. Sloan K, Haberman H, Lynde CW. Carbon dioxide laser-treatment of resistant verrucae vulgaris: retrospective analysis. J Cutan Med Surg. 1998;2:142-145.

8. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling J, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325:461.-

9. Warts. Public Resource Center [website], American Academy of Dermatology. Available at: www.aad.org/public/publications/pamphlets/Warts.htm. Accessed on August 3, 2006.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 55(9)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 55(9)
Page Number
801-802
Page Number
801-802
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
What nonpharmacological treatments are effective against common nongenital warts?
Display Headline
What nonpharmacological treatments are effective against common nongenital warts?
Sections
PURLs Copyright

The Journal of Family Practice ©2006 Dowden Health Media

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media