User login
Findings at Baseline Colonoscopy Are Associated With Future Advanced Neoplasia Despite an Intervening Negative Colonoscopy
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines suggest that timing of a 3rd colonoscopy should be based on results of two prior exams. However, data are limited on whether baseline screening colonoscopy can inform the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) at 3rd exam.
Methods: This study describes the risk of AN at 3rd colonoscopy stratified by findings on two previous exams in a prospective screening cohort and compares this risk over time from a negative 2nd exam between those with differing 1st exam findings.
The CSP #380 cohort included 3,121 Veterans aged 50-75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy from 1994-1997 and were followed for at least 10 years. Exclusion criteria included not having three colonoscopies more than one year apart, or having CRC at 1st or 2nd exam. The primary outcome was the proportion of AN at 3rd exam. Findings at 1st and 2nd exam were classified as high-risk adenoma (HRA), low-risk adenoma (LRA), or no adenoma. Chi-square tests compared proportions of AN on the 3rd exam between those with different baseline screening results but similar 2nd exam findings.
Results: This analysis included 891 participants: 58 (6.5%) had AN at 3rd exam. The proportion of AN at 3rd exam ranged from 3.2% to 21.4% when stratified by results of two previous exams. In participants with HRA or LRA on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was not associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam. However, for participants with no adenomas on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam (P =.04). Furthermore, all AN was identified within about 5 years of the negative 2nd exam in those with HRA on the 1st exam.
Conclusions: Results of the 1st exam remain a risk factor for AN at 3rd exam in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam. This supports current guidelines which recommend a shortened surveillance interval in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam but HRA at 1st. Future work will combine CRC risk factors with genomic risk and colonoscopy outcomes over time to better identify individuals who might benefit from continued surveillance and to help inform appropriate surveillance intervals.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines suggest that timing of a 3rd colonoscopy should be based on results of two prior exams. However, data are limited on whether baseline screening colonoscopy can inform the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) at 3rd exam.
Methods: This study describes the risk of AN at 3rd colonoscopy stratified by findings on two previous exams in a prospective screening cohort and compares this risk over time from a negative 2nd exam between those with differing 1st exam findings.
The CSP #380 cohort included 3,121 Veterans aged 50-75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy from 1994-1997 and were followed for at least 10 years. Exclusion criteria included not having three colonoscopies more than one year apart, or having CRC at 1st or 2nd exam. The primary outcome was the proportion of AN at 3rd exam. Findings at 1st and 2nd exam were classified as high-risk adenoma (HRA), low-risk adenoma (LRA), or no adenoma. Chi-square tests compared proportions of AN on the 3rd exam between those with different baseline screening results but similar 2nd exam findings.
Results: This analysis included 891 participants: 58 (6.5%) had AN at 3rd exam. The proportion of AN at 3rd exam ranged from 3.2% to 21.4% when stratified by results of two previous exams. In participants with HRA or LRA on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was not associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam. However, for participants with no adenomas on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam (P =.04). Furthermore, all AN was identified within about 5 years of the negative 2nd exam in those with HRA on the 1st exam.
Conclusions: Results of the 1st exam remain a risk factor for AN at 3rd exam in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam. This supports current guidelines which recommend a shortened surveillance interval in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam but HRA at 1st. Future work will combine CRC risk factors with genomic risk and colonoscopy outcomes over time to better identify individuals who might benefit from continued surveillance and to help inform appropriate surveillance intervals.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines suggest that timing of a 3rd colonoscopy should be based on results of two prior exams. However, data are limited on whether baseline screening colonoscopy can inform the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) at 3rd exam.
Methods: This study describes the risk of AN at 3rd colonoscopy stratified by findings on two previous exams in a prospective screening cohort and compares this risk over time from a negative 2nd exam between those with differing 1st exam findings.
The CSP #380 cohort included 3,121 Veterans aged 50-75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy from 1994-1997 and were followed for at least 10 years. Exclusion criteria included not having three colonoscopies more than one year apart, or having CRC at 1st or 2nd exam. The primary outcome was the proportion of AN at 3rd exam. Findings at 1st and 2nd exam were classified as high-risk adenoma (HRA), low-risk adenoma (LRA), or no adenoma. Chi-square tests compared proportions of AN on the 3rd exam between those with different baseline screening results but similar 2nd exam findings.
Results: This analysis included 891 participants: 58 (6.5%) had AN at 3rd exam. The proportion of AN at 3rd exam ranged from 3.2% to 21.4% when stratified by results of two previous exams. In participants with HRA or LRA on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was not associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam. However, for participants with no adenomas on the 2nd exam, baseline screening colonoscopy was associated with risk of AN at 3rd exam (P =.04). Furthermore, all AN was identified within about 5 years of the negative 2nd exam in those with HRA on the 1st exam.
Conclusions: Results of the 1st exam remain a risk factor for AN at 3rd exam in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam. This supports current guidelines which recommend a shortened surveillance interval in those with no adenomas at 2nd exam but HRA at 1st. Future work will combine CRC risk factors with genomic risk and colonoscopy outcomes over time to better identify individuals who might benefit from continued surveillance and to help inform appropriate surveillance intervals.
Cancer Among Women Treated in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Background: The Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system is a high-volume provider of cancer care. Women are the fastest growing patient population using VA health care services. Quantifying the types of cancers diagnosed among women in the VA is a critical step toward identifying needed healthcare resources for women veterans with cancer.
Methods: We obtained data from the VA Central Cancer Registry for cancers newly diagnosed in calendar year 2010. Our analysis was limited to women diagnosed with invasive cancers (eg, stages I-IV) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 in the VA healthcare system. We evaluated frequency distributions of incident cancer diagnoses by primary anatomical site, race, and geographic region. For commonly occurring cancers, we reported distribution by stage.
Results: We identified 1,330 women diagnosed with invasive cancer in the VA healthcare system in 2010. The most commonly diagnosed cancer among women veterans was breast (30%), followed by cancers of the respiratory (16%), gastrointestinal (12%), and gynecological systems (12%). The most commonly diagnosed cancers were similar for white and minority women, except white women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with respiratory cancers (P < .01) and minority women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers (P = .03).
Conclusions: Understanding cancer incidence among women veterans is important for healthcare resource planning. While cancer incidence among women using the VA healthcare system is similar to US civilian women, the geographic dispersion and small incidence relative to male cancers raises challenges for high-quality, well-coordinated cancer care within the VA.
Background: The Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system is a high-volume provider of cancer care. Women are the fastest growing patient population using VA health care services. Quantifying the types of cancers diagnosed among women in the VA is a critical step toward identifying needed healthcare resources for women veterans with cancer.
Methods: We obtained data from the VA Central Cancer Registry for cancers newly diagnosed in calendar year 2010. Our analysis was limited to women diagnosed with invasive cancers (eg, stages I-IV) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 in the VA healthcare system. We evaluated frequency distributions of incident cancer diagnoses by primary anatomical site, race, and geographic region. For commonly occurring cancers, we reported distribution by stage.
Results: We identified 1,330 women diagnosed with invasive cancer in the VA healthcare system in 2010. The most commonly diagnosed cancer among women veterans was breast (30%), followed by cancers of the respiratory (16%), gastrointestinal (12%), and gynecological systems (12%). The most commonly diagnosed cancers were similar for white and minority women, except white women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with respiratory cancers (P < .01) and minority women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers (P = .03).
Conclusions: Understanding cancer incidence among women veterans is important for healthcare resource planning. While cancer incidence among women using the VA healthcare system is similar to US civilian women, the geographic dispersion and small incidence relative to male cancers raises challenges for high-quality, well-coordinated cancer care within the VA.
Background: The Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system is a high-volume provider of cancer care. Women are the fastest growing patient population using VA health care services. Quantifying the types of cancers diagnosed among women in the VA is a critical step toward identifying needed healthcare resources for women veterans with cancer.
Methods: We obtained data from the VA Central Cancer Registry for cancers newly diagnosed in calendar year 2010. Our analysis was limited to women diagnosed with invasive cancers (eg, stages I-IV) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 in the VA healthcare system. We evaluated frequency distributions of incident cancer diagnoses by primary anatomical site, race, and geographic region. For commonly occurring cancers, we reported distribution by stage.
Results: We identified 1,330 women diagnosed with invasive cancer in the VA healthcare system in 2010. The most commonly diagnosed cancer among women veterans was breast (30%), followed by cancers of the respiratory (16%), gastrointestinal (12%), and gynecological systems (12%). The most commonly diagnosed cancers were similar for white and minority women, except white women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with respiratory cancers (P < .01) and minority women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers (P = .03).
Conclusions: Understanding cancer incidence among women veterans is important for healthcare resource planning. While cancer incidence among women using the VA healthcare system is similar to US civilian women, the geographic dispersion and small incidence relative to male cancers raises challenges for high-quality, well-coordinated cancer care within the VA.
Cancer Incidence in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry Analysis
Purpose: Our objective is to comprehensively describe cancer incidence as reported in the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR).
Background: Approximately 3% of US cancer cases are diagnosed and treated in the VA healthcare system each year. These cancer cases are reported in the VACCR. In 2012, we published the first comprehensive description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2007. In our current analysis, we provide an updated description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2010.
Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. We obtained data from 2 sources: (1) VACCR for incident cancer cases; (2) VHA Support Service Center (VSSC) for underlying population of VA healthcare system users.
Data Analysis: Analyses focused on diagnoses in 2010. Noninvasive cancers and those missing TNM stage were excluded from analyses. Cancer incidence among VA patients was descriptively
compared to the general US cancer population.
Results: In 2010, 49,857 cases were reported in VACCR. We excluded non-invasive cases (n = 3,687) and those with missing/unknown stage (n = 8,645). There were 37,525 reported invasive, incident cancers, and 97% (n = 36,454) of those were diagnosed among men. Almost 80% (n = 29,364) of newly diagnosed patients were white, 20% (n = 7,293) were black, and less than 2% (n = 450) were another race. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. The six most frequently diagnosed cancers were prostate (33%, n = 12,431), lung/bronchus (19%, n = 7,159), colon/rectum (9%, n = 3,419), kidney/renal pelvis (4%, n = 1,657), and urinary bladder (4%, n = 1,427) and skin melanomas (4%, n = 1,421). The most common cancers reported in VACCR have remained stable from 2007 to 2010. Approximately 87% (n = 10,845) of prostate, 33% (n = 2,391) of lung/bronchus, and 59% (n = 2,013) of colon/rectum cancers were diagnosed with early stage (stage I or II) disease. Compared to SEER, cases reported in the VACCR tend to be diagnosed at earlier stages. The overall cancer incidence rate among VA users was 414.8 per 100,000 person-years.
Implications: The VA continues to be a large provider of cancer care in the US. VACCR data indicate that incident cancers in VA in 2010 approximately mirrored those observed among US men.
Purpose: Our objective is to comprehensively describe cancer incidence as reported in the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR).
Background: Approximately 3% of US cancer cases are diagnosed and treated in the VA healthcare system each year. These cancer cases are reported in the VACCR. In 2012, we published the first comprehensive description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2007. In our current analysis, we provide an updated description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2010.
Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. We obtained data from 2 sources: (1) VACCR for incident cancer cases; (2) VHA Support Service Center (VSSC) for underlying population of VA healthcare system users.
Data Analysis: Analyses focused on diagnoses in 2010. Noninvasive cancers and those missing TNM stage were excluded from analyses. Cancer incidence among VA patients was descriptively
compared to the general US cancer population.
Results: In 2010, 49,857 cases were reported in VACCR. We excluded non-invasive cases (n = 3,687) and those with missing/unknown stage (n = 8,645). There were 37,525 reported invasive, incident cancers, and 97% (n = 36,454) of those were diagnosed among men. Almost 80% (n = 29,364) of newly diagnosed patients were white, 20% (n = 7,293) were black, and less than 2% (n = 450) were another race. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. The six most frequently diagnosed cancers were prostate (33%, n = 12,431), lung/bronchus (19%, n = 7,159), colon/rectum (9%, n = 3,419), kidney/renal pelvis (4%, n = 1,657), and urinary bladder (4%, n = 1,427) and skin melanomas (4%, n = 1,421). The most common cancers reported in VACCR have remained stable from 2007 to 2010. Approximately 87% (n = 10,845) of prostate, 33% (n = 2,391) of lung/bronchus, and 59% (n = 2,013) of colon/rectum cancers were diagnosed with early stage (stage I or II) disease. Compared to SEER, cases reported in the VACCR tend to be diagnosed at earlier stages. The overall cancer incidence rate among VA users was 414.8 per 100,000 person-years.
Implications: The VA continues to be a large provider of cancer care in the US. VACCR data indicate that incident cancers in VA in 2010 approximately mirrored those observed among US men.
Purpose: Our objective is to comprehensively describe cancer incidence as reported in the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR).
Background: Approximately 3% of US cancer cases are diagnosed and treated in the VA healthcare system each year. These cancer cases are reported in the VACCR. In 2012, we published the first comprehensive description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2007. In our current analysis, we provide an updated description of cancer incidence as reported in the VACCR for patients diagnosed in 2010.
Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. We obtained data from 2 sources: (1) VACCR for incident cancer cases; (2) VHA Support Service Center (VSSC) for underlying population of VA healthcare system users.
Data Analysis: Analyses focused on diagnoses in 2010. Noninvasive cancers and those missing TNM stage were excluded from analyses. Cancer incidence among VA patients was descriptively
compared to the general US cancer population.
Results: In 2010, 49,857 cases were reported in VACCR. We excluded non-invasive cases (n = 3,687) and those with missing/unknown stage (n = 8,645). There were 37,525 reported invasive, incident cancers, and 97% (n = 36,454) of those were diagnosed among men. Almost 80% (n = 29,364) of newly diagnosed patients were white, 20% (n = 7,293) were black, and less than 2% (n = 450) were another race. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. The six most frequently diagnosed cancers were prostate (33%, n = 12,431), lung/bronchus (19%, n = 7,159), colon/rectum (9%, n = 3,419), kidney/renal pelvis (4%, n = 1,657), and urinary bladder (4%, n = 1,427) and skin melanomas (4%, n = 1,421). The most common cancers reported in VACCR have remained stable from 2007 to 2010. Approximately 87% (n = 10,845) of prostate, 33% (n = 2,391) of lung/bronchus, and 59% (n = 2,013) of colon/rectum cancers were diagnosed with early stage (stage I or II) disease. Compared to SEER, cases reported in the VACCR tend to be diagnosed at earlier stages. The overall cancer incidence rate among VA users was 414.8 per 100,000 person-years.
Implications: The VA continues to be a large provider of cancer care in the US. VACCR data indicate that incident cancers in VA in 2010 approximately mirrored those observed among US men.