Biennial vs annual mammography: How I manage my patients

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 18:17
Display Headline
Biennial vs annual mammography: How I manage my patients

Controversy surrounds the issue of mammographic screening intervals for older women, with conflicting recommendations from professional organizations and governmental bodies. For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends biennial screening for women aged 50 to 74 years,1 whereas the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists2 and the American Cancer Society3 both recommend annual screening for women aged 40 years and older, with no upper age limit. It also has been unclear how patient comorbidities affect screening.

Recently, Braithwaite and colleagues addressed both issues in a prospective trial of 3,000 women with breast cancer and 138,000 women without breast cancer—all of them aged 66 to 89 years.4

What did they find?

Details of the trial. This study was conducted between ­January 1999 and December 2006. Using logistic-regression analyses, the study authors calculated the odds of advanced tumors and the 10-year cumulative probability of false-positive findings by the frequency of screening (1 vs 2 years), age, and comorbidity score, as determined using the Klabunde approximation of the Charlson score.1

All women underwent mammography at a facility that participated in data linkage between the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium and Medicare claims.

Screening interval had no effect on odds of advanced tumors. The study authors found no difference in the rate of advanced breast cancer (adverse characteristics included stage IIb or higher, tumor size greater than 20 mm, or positive lymph nodes) when screening was biennial versus annual, and no effect of comorbidities on this percentage.4

Annual screening led to more false-positives. In fact, Braithwaite and colleagues found that 48% of women aged 66 to 74 years had at least one false-positive screen in the annual-screening group (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1–49.9), compared with 29% of biennial screeners (95% CI, 28.1–29.9).1

Balance of data seems to tilt toward biennial screening

In this study, Braithwaite and colleagues observe that their findings are consistent with those of earlier studies indicating that biennial screening retains the benefits of annual assessment and reduces the false-positive rate.

RELATED ARTICLE: Update on Breast Health

Guiding my patients. Although I expect most of my patients aged 50 and older to continue to seek annual mammograms for the foreseeable future, I plan to be flexible about mammography intervals, given these findings. Therefore, if a patient aged 50 years or older is receptive to being screened less often than annually, I would encourage her to be screened every 2 years, provided she is not at elevated risk of breast cancer by virtue of family or personal history, genetic testing, or earlier findings.

References

1.    US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Breast Cancer. http://www.uspreventiveservicestask force.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed May 17, 2013.

2.    American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 122: Breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 pt 1):372-82.

3.    Breast cancer: early detection. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Accessed May 17, 2013.

4.    Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: Does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(5):334–341. 

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Kaunitz is Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors. 

Dr. Kaunitz reports that he receives grant or research support from Agile, Bayer, Endoceutics, Teva, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, and Noven, and that he is a consultant to Agile, Bayer, Merck, and Noven.

Issue
OBG Management - 25(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
18
Legacy Keywords
mammography,biennial mammography,annual mammography,breast cancer,false-positive findings,aged 50 and older,mammography intervals,USPTF,ACOG,ACA,breast cancer screening,advanced breast cancer,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Kaunitz is Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors. 

Dr. Kaunitz reports that he receives grant or research support from Agile, Bayer, Endoceutics, Teva, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, and Noven, and that he is a consultant to Agile, Bayer, Merck, and Noven.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Kaunitz is Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors. 

Dr. Kaunitz reports that he receives grant or research support from Agile, Bayer, Endoceutics, Teva, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, and Noven, and that he is a consultant to Agile, Bayer, Merck, and Noven.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Controversy surrounds the issue of mammographic screening intervals for older women, with conflicting recommendations from professional organizations and governmental bodies. For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends biennial screening for women aged 50 to 74 years,1 whereas the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists2 and the American Cancer Society3 both recommend annual screening for women aged 40 years and older, with no upper age limit. It also has been unclear how patient comorbidities affect screening.

Recently, Braithwaite and colleagues addressed both issues in a prospective trial of 3,000 women with breast cancer and 138,000 women without breast cancer—all of them aged 66 to 89 years.4

What did they find?

Details of the trial. This study was conducted between ­January 1999 and December 2006. Using logistic-regression analyses, the study authors calculated the odds of advanced tumors and the 10-year cumulative probability of false-positive findings by the frequency of screening (1 vs 2 years), age, and comorbidity score, as determined using the Klabunde approximation of the Charlson score.1

All women underwent mammography at a facility that participated in data linkage between the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium and Medicare claims.

Screening interval had no effect on odds of advanced tumors. The study authors found no difference in the rate of advanced breast cancer (adverse characteristics included stage IIb or higher, tumor size greater than 20 mm, or positive lymph nodes) when screening was biennial versus annual, and no effect of comorbidities on this percentage.4

Annual screening led to more false-positives. In fact, Braithwaite and colleagues found that 48% of women aged 66 to 74 years had at least one false-positive screen in the annual-screening group (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1–49.9), compared with 29% of biennial screeners (95% CI, 28.1–29.9).1

Balance of data seems to tilt toward biennial screening

In this study, Braithwaite and colleagues observe that their findings are consistent with those of earlier studies indicating that biennial screening retains the benefits of annual assessment and reduces the false-positive rate.

RELATED ARTICLE: Update on Breast Health

Guiding my patients. Although I expect most of my patients aged 50 and older to continue to seek annual mammograms for the foreseeable future, I plan to be flexible about mammography intervals, given these findings. Therefore, if a patient aged 50 years or older is receptive to being screened less often than annually, I would encourage her to be screened every 2 years, provided she is not at elevated risk of breast cancer by virtue of family or personal history, genetic testing, or earlier findings.

Controversy surrounds the issue of mammographic screening intervals for older women, with conflicting recommendations from professional organizations and governmental bodies. For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends biennial screening for women aged 50 to 74 years,1 whereas the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists2 and the American Cancer Society3 both recommend annual screening for women aged 40 years and older, with no upper age limit. It also has been unclear how patient comorbidities affect screening.

Recently, Braithwaite and colleagues addressed both issues in a prospective trial of 3,000 women with breast cancer and 138,000 women without breast cancer—all of them aged 66 to 89 years.4

What did they find?

Details of the trial. This study was conducted between ­January 1999 and December 2006. Using logistic-regression analyses, the study authors calculated the odds of advanced tumors and the 10-year cumulative probability of false-positive findings by the frequency of screening (1 vs 2 years), age, and comorbidity score, as determined using the Klabunde approximation of the Charlson score.1

All women underwent mammography at a facility that participated in data linkage between the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium and Medicare claims.

Screening interval had no effect on odds of advanced tumors. The study authors found no difference in the rate of advanced breast cancer (adverse characteristics included stage IIb or higher, tumor size greater than 20 mm, or positive lymph nodes) when screening was biennial versus annual, and no effect of comorbidities on this percentage.4

Annual screening led to more false-positives. In fact, Braithwaite and colleagues found that 48% of women aged 66 to 74 years had at least one false-positive screen in the annual-screening group (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1–49.9), compared with 29% of biennial screeners (95% CI, 28.1–29.9).1

Balance of data seems to tilt toward biennial screening

In this study, Braithwaite and colleagues observe that their findings are consistent with those of earlier studies indicating that biennial screening retains the benefits of annual assessment and reduces the false-positive rate.

RELATED ARTICLE: Update on Breast Health

Guiding my patients. Although I expect most of my patients aged 50 and older to continue to seek annual mammograms for the foreseeable future, I plan to be flexible about mammography intervals, given these findings. Therefore, if a patient aged 50 years or older is receptive to being screened less often than annually, I would encourage her to be screened every 2 years, provided she is not at elevated risk of breast cancer by virtue of family or personal history, genetic testing, or earlier findings.

References

1.    US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Breast Cancer. http://www.uspreventiveservicestask force.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed May 17, 2013.

2.    American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 122: Breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 pt 1):372-82.

3.    Breast cancer: early detection. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Accessed May 17, 2013.

4.    Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: Does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(5):334–341. 

References

1.    US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Breast Cancer. http://www.uspreventiveservicestask force.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed May 17, 2013.

2.    American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 122: Breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 pt 1):372-82.

3.    Breast cancer: early detection. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Accessed May 17, 2013.

4.    Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: Does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(5):334–341. 

Issue
OBG Management - 25(6)
Issue
OBG Management - 25(6)
Page Number
18
Page Number
18
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Biennial vs annual mammography: How I manage my patients
Display Headline
Biennial vs annual mammography: How I manage my patients
Legacy Keywords
mammography,biennial mammography,annual mammography,breast cancer,false-positive findings,aged 50 and older,mammography intervals,USPTF,ACOG,ACA,breast cancer screening,advanced breast cancer,
Legacy Keywords
mammography,biennial mammography,annual mammography,breast cancer,false-positive findings,aged 50 and older,mammography intervals,USPTF,ACOG,ACA,breast cancer screening,advanced breast cancer,
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media