User login
Clinical question: Among patients discharged from the hospital, how do patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures change after discharge, and can they predict readmission or ED visit?
Background: Variables to predict 30-day rehospitalizations of discharged general medical patients have been looked into, but not many strategies have incorporated PRO measures in predictive models.
Study design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Setting: Patients discharged from an urban safety-net hospital that serves 128 municipalities in northeastern Illinois, including the city of Chicago.
Synopsis: One hundred ninety-six patients completed the initial survey; completion rates were 98%, 90%, and 88% for the 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-up surveys, respectively. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health short form assessing general self-rated health (GSRH), global physical health (GPH), and global mental health (GMH) were administered. In-hospital assessments of GMH and GSRH predicted 14-day reutilization, whereas post-hospitalization assessments of MSAS and GPH predicted subsequent utilizations. Notable limitations of the study include small sample size with high proportion of uninsured and racial/ethnic minorities and inability to count utilization at hospital(s) other than the hospital studied.
Bottom line: PRO measures are likely to be useful predictors in clinical medicine. More research is needed to improve the generalizability of PRO measures. Perhaps determination of specific measures of high predictive value may be more useful.
Citation: Hinami K, Smith J, Deamant CD, DuBeshter K, Trick WE. When do patient-reported outcome measures inform readmission risk? J Hosp Med. 2015;10(5):294-300.
Clinical question: Among patients discharged from the hospital, how do patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures change after discharge, and can they predict readmission or ED visit?
Background: Variables to predict 30-day rehospitalizations of discharged general medical patients have been looked into, but not many strategies have incorporated PRO measures in predictive models.
Study design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Setting: Patients discharged from an urban safety-net hospital that serves 128 municipalities in northeastern Illinois, including the city of Chicago.
Synopsis: One hundred ninety-six patients completed the initial survey; completion rates were 98%, 90%, and 88% for the 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-up surveys, respectively. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health short form assessing general self-rated health (GSRH), global physical health (GPH), and global mental health (GMH) were administered. In-hospital assessments of GMH and GSRH predicted 14-day reutilization, whereas post-hospitalization assessments of MSAS and GPH predicted subsequent utilizations. Notable limitations of the study include small sample size with high proportion of uninsured and racial/ethnic minorities and inability to count utilization at hospital(s) other than the hospital studied.
Bottom line: PRO measures are likely to be useful predictors in clinical medicine. More research is needed to improve the generalizability of PRO measures. Perhaps determination of specific measures of high predictive value may be more useful.
Citation: Hinami K, Smith J, Deamant CD, DuBeshter K, Trick WE. When do patient-reported outcome measures inform readmission risk? J Hosp Med. 2015;10(5):294-300.
Clinical question: Among patients discharged from the hospital, how do patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures change after discharge, and can they predict readmission or ED visit?
Background: Variables to predict 30-day rehospitalizations of discharged general medical patients have been looked into, but not many strategies have incorporated PRO measures in predictive models.
Study design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Setting: Patients discharged from an urban safety-net hospital that serves 128 municipalities in northeastern Illinois, including the city of Chicago.
Synopsis: One hundred ninety-six patients completed the initial survey; completion rates were 98%, 90%, and 88% for the 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-up surveys, respectively. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health short form assessing general self-rated health (GSRH), global physical health (GPH), and global mental health (GMH) were administered. In-hospital assessments of GMH and GSRH predicted 14-day reutilization, whereas post-hospitalization assessments of MSAS and GPH predicted subsequent utilizations. Notable limitations of the study include small sample size with high proportion of uninsured and racial/ethnic minorities and inability to count utilization at hospital(s) other than the hospital studied.
Bottom line: PRO measures are likely to be useful predictors in clinical medicine. More research is needed to improve the generalizability of PRO measures. Perhaps determination of specific measures of high predictive value may be more useful.
Citation: Hinami K, Smith J, Deamant CD, DuBeshter K, Trick WE. When do patient-reported outcome measures inform readmission risk? J Hosp Med. 2015;10(5):294-300.