Single-dose NEPA found non-inferior to aprepitant/granisetron

Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.

Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.

Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.