QOL data support ATRA-ATO in APL

MILAN—Quality of life (QOL) data support the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a GIMEMA researcher has reported.

Previously released data from a phase 3 study showed that ATRA-ATO can improve survival rates in APL patients when compared to ATRA plus chemotherapy.

Now, a QOL assessment of these same patients suggests ATO can confer additional benefits.

Researchers observed post-induction improvements in fatigue, cognitive functioning, and other QOL outcome measures among patients treated with ATRA-ATO. However, there were no major differences in post-consolidation results between the ATO arm and the chemotherapy arm.

Nevertheless, the results suggest ATRA-ATO should be considered the preferred first-line therapy in APL, according to Fabio Efficace, PhD, of the GIMEMA Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit in Rome, Italy.

Dr Efficace presented QOL data for ATRA-ATO at the 19th Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstract S1330.

“When conducting a clinical trial—especially a randomized, phase 3 study—it is of paramount importance to include quality of life assessment,” Dr Efficace said. “If quality of life is assessed in a robust way . . ., it will always provide very important information to [help us] judge the overall treatment effectiveness.”

To that end, he and his colleagues performed QOL assessments of patients enrolled in a randomized, phase 3 trial. The study was designed to show that ATRA-ATO was non-inferior to ATRA- chemo with respect to event-free survival rates at 2 years.

The trial actually showed that ATRA-ATO was superior to ATRA-chemo with regard to both event-free and overall survival.

To assess differences in QOL measures, Dr Efficace and his colleagues asked patients to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire post-induction and post-consolidation.

The questionnaire is used to assess functional aspects, including cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, physical functioning, role functioning, and social functioning. It’s also used to evaluate core symptoms, including pain, fatigue, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, and appetite loss.

In all, 156 patients received at least 1 dose of their assigned therapy. In the ATRA-chemo group, 62 patients completed the QOL questionnaire post-induction, and 61 did so post-consolidation. In the ATRA-ATO group, 53 patients completed the questionnaire post-induction, and 58 did so post-consolidation.

Post-induction, patients treated with ATRA-ATO reported significantly less fatigue than patients in the ATRA-chemo arm. ATO-treated patients also reported clinically meaningful improvements in appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning.

“We know that when you’re doing chemotherapy, one of the possible effects is loss of cognitive functioning,” Dr Efficace noted. “And we found, for those not receiving chemotherapy, a benefit in cognitive function. So this is something that has to be explored in further studies.”

Dr Efficace also pointed out that, post-consolidation, there were “no major differences” in QOL measures between the 2 treatment arms. Nevertheless, he believes the initial benefits in fatigue and other symptoms support ATRA-ATO as the preferred first-line therapy for APL patients.

“The clinician should be reassured that [ATRA-]ATO as first-line therapy not only provides benefits in terms of event-free survival and overall survival, but it also provides advantages in terms of side effects of therapy,” Dr Efficace said.

“In this trial, we assessed toxicity, but toxicity is physician-reported data. Now, we have patient-reported data. [ATRA-]ATO should be the preferred first-line therapy because it is optimal from the patient perspective.”

MILAN—Quality of life (QOL) data support the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a GIMEMA researcher has reported.

Previously released data from a phase 3 study showed that ATRA-ATO can improve survival rates in APL patients when compared to ATRA plus chemotherapy.

Now, a QOL assessment of these same patients suggests ATO can confer additional benefits.

Researchers observed post-induction improvements in fatigue, cognitive functioning, and other QOL outcome measures among patients treated with ATRA-ATO. However, there were no major differences in post-consolidation results between the ATO arm and the chemotherapy arm.

Nevertheless, the results suggest ATRA-ATO should be considered the preferred first-line therapy in APL, according to Fabio Efficace, PhD, of the GIMEMA Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit in Rome, Italy.

Dr Efficace presented QOL data for ATRA-ATO at the 19th Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstract S1330.

“When conducting a clinical trial—especially a randomized, phase 3 study—it is of paramount importance to include quality of life assessment,” Dr Efficace said. “If quality of life is assessed in a robust way . . ., it will always provide very important information to [help us] judge the overall treatment effectiveness.”

To that end, he and his colleagues performed QOL assessments of patients enrolled in a randomized, phase 3 trial. The study was designed to show that ATRA-ATO was non-inferior to ATRA- chemo with respect to event-free survival rates at 2 years.

The trial actually showed that ATRA-ATO was superior to ATRA-chemo with regard to both event-free and overall survival.

To assess differences in QOL measures, Dr Efficace and his colleagues asked patients to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire post-induction and post-consolidation.

The questionnaire is used to assess functional aspects, including cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, physical functioning, role functioning, and social functioning. It’s also used to evaluate core symptoms, including pain, fatigue, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, and appetite loss.

In all, 156 patients received at least 1 dose of their assigned therapy. In the ATRA-chemo group, 62 patients completed the QOL questionnaire post-induction, and 61 did so post-consolidation. In the ATRA-ATO group, 53 patients completed the questionnaire post-induction, and 58 did so post-consolidation.

Post-induction, patients treated with ATRA-ATO reported significantly less fatigue than patients in the ATRA-chemo arm. ATO-treated patients also reported clinically meaningful improvements in appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning.

“We know that when you’re doing chemotherapy, one of the possible effects is loss of cognitive functioning,” Dr Efficace noted. “And we found, for those not receiving chemotherapy, a benefit in cognitive function. So this is something that has to be explored in further studies.”

Dr Efficace also pointed out that, post-consolidation, there were “no major differences” in QOL measures between the 2 treatment arms. Nevertheless, he believes the initial benefits in fatigue and other symptoms support ATRA-ATO as the preferred first-line therapy for APL patients.

“The clinician should be reassured that [ATRA-]ATO as first-line therapy not only provides benefits in terms of event-free survival and overall survival, but it also provides advantages in terms of side effects of therapy,” Dr Efficace said.

“In this trial, we assessed toxicity, but toxicity is physician-reported data. Now, we have patient-reported data. [ATRA-]ATO should be the preferred first-line therapy because it is optimal from the patient perspective.”

MILAN—Quality of life (QOL) data support the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a GIMEMA researcher has reported.

Previously released data from a phase 3 study showed that ATRA-ATO can improve survival rates in APL patients when compared to ATRA plus chemotherapy.

Now, a QOL assessment of these same patients suggests ATO can confer additional benefits.

Researchers observed post-induction improvements in fatigue, cognitive functioning, and other QOL outcome measures among patients treated with ATRA-ATO. However, there were no major differences in post-consolidation results between the ATO arm and the chemotherapy arm.

Nevertheless, the results suggest ATRA-ATO should be considered the preferred first-line therapy in APL, according to Fabio Efficace, PhD, of the GIMEMA Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit in Rome, Italy.

Dr Efficace presented QOL data for ATRA-ATO at the 19th Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstract S1330.

“When conducting a clinical trial—especially a randomized, phase 3 study—it is of paramount importance to include quality of life assessment,” Dr Efficace said. “If quality of life is assessed in a robust way . . ., it will always provide very important information to [help us] judge the overall treatment effectiveness.”

To that end, he and his colleagues performed QOL assessments of patients enrolled in a randomized, phase 3 trial. The study was designed to show that ATRA-ATO was non-inferior to ATRA- chemo with respect to event-free survival rates at 2 years.

The trial actually showed that ATRA-ATO was superior to ATRA-chemo with regard to both event-free and overall survival.

To assess differences in QOL measures, Dr Efficace and his colleagues asked patients to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire post-induction and post-consolidation.

The questionnaire is used to assess functional aspects, including cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, physical functioning, role functioning, and social functioning. It’s also used to evaluate core symptoms, including pain, fatigue, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, and appetite loss.

In all, 156 patients received at least 1 dose of their assigned therapy. In the ATRA-chemo group, 62 patients completed the QOL questionnaire post-induction, and 61 did so post-consolidation. In the ATRA-ATO group, 53 patients completed the questionnaire post-induction, and 58 did so post-consolidation.

Post-induction, patients treated with ATRA-ATO reported significantly less fatigue than patients in the ATRA-chemo arm. ATO-treated patients also reported clinically meaningful improvements in appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning.

“We know that when you’re doing chemotherapy, one of the possible effects is loss of cognitive functioning,” Dr Efficace noted. “And we found, for those not receiving chemotherapy, a benefit in cognitive function. So this is something that has to be explored in further studies.”

Dr Efficace also pointed out that, post-consolidation, there were “no major differences” in QOL measures between the 2 treatment arms. Nevertheless, he believes the initial benefits in fatigue and other symptoms support ATRA-ATO as the preferred first-line therapy for APL patients.

“The clinician should be reassured that [ATRA-]ATO as first-line therapy not only provides benefits in terms of event-free survival and overall survival, but it also provides advantages in terms of side effects of therapy,” Dr Efficace said.

“In this trial, we assessed toxicity, but toxicity is physician-reported data. Now, we have patient-reported data. [ATRA-]ATO should be the preferred first-line therapy because it is optimal from the patient perspective.”