Article Type

Changed

Fri, 01/04/2019 - 11:06

Display Headline

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Original research

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Gwendolyn P. Quinn, PhD; Caprice A. Knapp, PhD; Teri L. Malo, PhD; Jessica McIntyre, BA; Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD; Susan T. Vadaparampil, PhD
Abstract
Background
The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established guidelines for fertility preservation for cancer patients. In a national study of US oncologists, we examined attitudes toward the use of fertility preservation among patients with a poor prognosis, focusing on attitudes toward posthumous reproduction.
Method
A cross-sectional survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US oncologists. The survey measured demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice behaviors regarding posthumous reproduction and fertility preservation with cancer patients of childbearing age.
Results
Only 16.2% supported posthumous parenting, whereas the majority (51.5%) did not have an opinion. Analysis of variance indicated that attitudes toward posthumous reproduction were significantly related to physician practice behaviors and were dependent on oncologists' knowledge of ASCO guidelines.
Conclusions
Physician attitudes may conflict with the recommended guidelines and may reduce the likelihood that some patients will receive information about fertility preservation. Further education may raise physicians' awareness of poor-prognostic patients' interest in pursuing this technology.

*For a PDF of the full article click in the link to the left of this introduction.

Article PDF

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications

The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology

MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Topics

Patient & Survivor Care

Sections

Original Report

Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF

Article PDF

Original research

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Gwendolyn P. Quinn, PhD; Caprice A. Knapp, PhD; Teri L. Malo, PhD; Jessica McIntyre, BA; Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD; Susan T. Vadaparampil, PhD
Abstract
Background
The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established guidelines for fertility preservation for cancer patients. In a national study of US oncologists, we examined attitudes toward the use of fertility preservation among patients with a poor prognosis, focusing on attitudes toward posthumous reproduction.
Method
A cross-sectional survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US oncologists. The survey measured demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice behaviors regarding posthumous reproduction and fertility preservation with cancer patients of childbearing age.
Results
Only 16.2% supported posthumous parenting, whereas the majority (51.5%) did not have an opinion. Analysis of variance indicated that attitudes toward posthumous reproduction were significantly related to physician practice behaviors and were dependent on oncologists' knowledge of ASCO guidelines.
Conclusions
Physician attitudes may conflict with the recommended guidelines and may reduce the likelihood that some patients will receive information about fertility preservation. Further education may raise physicians' awareness of poor-prognostic patients' interest in pursuing this technology.

*For a PDF of the full article click in the link to the left of this introduction.

Original research

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Gwendolyn P. Quinn, PhD; Caprice A. Knapp, PhD; Teri L. Malo, PhD; Jessica McIntyre, BA; Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD; Susan T. Vadaparampil, PhD
Abstract
Background
The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established guidelines for fertility preservation for cancer patients. In a national study of US oncologists, we examined attitudes toward the use of fertility preservation among patients with a poor prognosis, focusing on attitudes toward posthumous reproduction.
Method
A cross-sectional survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US oncologists. The survey measured demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice behaviors regarding posthumous reproduction and fertility preservation with cancer patients of childbearing age.
Results
Only 16.2% supported posthumous parenting, whereas the majority (51.5%) did not have an opinion. Analysis of variance indicated that attitudes toward posthumous reproduction were significantly related to physician practice behaviors and were dependent on oncologists' knowledge of ASCO guidelines.
Conclusions
Physician attitudes may conflict with the recommended guidelines and may reduce the likelihood that some patients will receive information about fertility preservation. Further education may raise physicians' awareness of poor-prognostic patients' interest in pursuing this technology.

*For a PDF of the full article click in the link to the left of this introduction.

Publications

The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology

MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Publications

The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology

MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Topics

Patient & Survivor Care

Article Type

Display Headline

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Display Headline

Physicians' Undecided Attitudes Toward Posthumous Reproduction: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients with a Poor Prognosis

Sections

Original Report

Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media