ASH: Pill bottles flag noncompliance in patients on ALL maintenance

ORLANDO – Pill containers are not known for eloquence, but they tell a disturbing tale of patient over-reporting of adherence to essential leukemia maintenance therapy.

Among 416 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission, the number of days patients or their guardians reported that the child took his/her daily oral 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) for maintenance was significantly higher than the number of days the pill bottles were opened, as reported by an electronic medication management system.

“Over-reporting was more likely in patients who were non-adherent, older, of non-white race, and came from households with lower paternal education,” said Dr. Wendy Landier from the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

The results suggest that patient self-reports of adherence to 6MP oral maintenance therapy may be unreliable, and should be taken with a grain of salt, Dr. Landier said in a briefing at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

The investigators had previously reported that poor adherence to oral 6MP maintenance therapy was associated with a nealy four-fold increased risk for relapse (JCO 30[17]:2094-101, Blood 124[15]:2345-53).

To better understand why some patients are poorly adherent to 6MP maintenance therapy, the investigator provided 416 children with ALL in first remission with pill containers equipped with a Medication Event Management System (MEMS) that electronically recorded the dates and times that each pill bottle was opened over a 16-week period. Patients age 12 and older or the parents/guardians of younger children were also asked to report the date and time of each daily oral dose at the end of each 28-day study month.

The authors collected and evaluated a total of 1344 patient-months of self-report and MEMS data, compared the records, and stratified patients as either “perfect reporters”, whose self-reports matched the objective MEMS data; “over-reporters”, who self-report exceeded the MEMS data on 5 or more days per month for more than half of study months, and “others.”The median patient age at study entry was 6 years (range 2 to 20 years).

The authors reported in their study that 40.4% of patients were not adherent to oral 6MP therapy, as evidence by a mismatch between self-report and objective (MEMS) reporting.

The overall adjusted mean number of self-reported days per month that patients took their pills ranged from a low of 25.8+5.3 to a high of 26.1+4.5. The pill bottles, however, told a different tale, reporting that they had been opened from a low of 22.8 ± 6.4 to a high of 25.4 ± 4.5 days per month.

Month-by-month correlations between self-report and MEMS 0.36 to 0.58, and were all statistically significant.

In logistic regression models adjusted for thiopurine methyltransferase (TMPT) genotype, 6MP dose intensity, and 6-thiogaunine levels in red cells, significant predictors for over-reporting included older age, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.07 for every 1-year increase in age (P = .04); Hispanic origin (OR 2.4, P = .02); Asian origin, (OR 3.1 P = .02; African-American origin (OR 5.3, P < .001); paternal education level lower than college (OR 2.1, P = .02); and 6MP non-adherence (OR 8.6, P < .0001).

Dr. Landier noted that 78.6% of over-reporters were non-adherent, compared with only 2% of perfect reporters.

“The real importance of this paper from my perspective is this: there is a famous quote that if the patient doesn’t take the medication it can’t work and in an era where we’re trying to improve the care of patients, one of the things we oftentimes forget that if the medication isn’t being taken, the patient can’t get better from it,” said Dr. Mark Crowther, Professor and Chair in the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Crowther moderated a briefing where Dr. Cserti-Gazdewich presented the data.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and from St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Landier and Dr. Crowther reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – Pill containers are not known for eloquence, but they tell a disturbing tale of patient over-reporting of adherence to essential leukemia maintenance therapy.

Among 416 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission, the number of days patients or their guardians reported that the child took his/her daily oral 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) for maintenance was significantly higher than the number of days the pill bottles were opened, as reported by an electronic medication management system.

“Over-reporting was more likely in patients who were non-adherent, older, of non-white race, and came from households with lower paternal education,” said Dr. Wendy Landier from the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

The results suggest that patient self-reports of adherence to 6MP oral maintenance therapy may be unreliable, and should be taken with a grain of salt, Dr. Landier said in a briefing at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

The investigators had previously reported that poor adherence to oral 6MP maintenance therapy was associated with a nealy four-fold increased risk for relapse (JCO 30[17]:2094-101, Blood 124[15]:2345-53).

To better understand why some patients are poorly adherent to 6MP maintenance therapy, the investigator provided 416 children with ALL in first remission with pill containers equipped with a Medication Event Management System (MEMS) that electronically recorded the dates and times that each pill bottle was opened over a 16-week period. Patients age 12 and older or the parents/guardians of younger children were also asked to report the date and time of each daily oral dose at the end of each 28-day study month.

The authors collected and evaluated a total of 1344 patient-months of self-report and MEMS data, compared the records, and stratified patients as either “perfect reporters”, whose self-reports matched the objective MEMS data; “over-reporters”, who self-report exceeded the MEMS data on 5 or more days per month for more than half of study months, and “others.”The median patient age at study entry was 6 years (range 2 to 20 years).

The authors reported in their study that 40.4% of patients were not adherent to oral 6MP therapy, as evidence by a mismatch between self-report and objective (MEMS) reporting.

The overall adjusted mean number of self-reported days per month that patients took their pills ranged from a low of 25.8+5.3 to a high of 26.1+4.5. The pill bottles, however, told a different tale, reporting that they had been opened from a low of 22.8 ± 6.4 to a high of 25.4 ± 4.5 days per month.

Month-by-month correlations between self-report and MEMS 0.36 to 0.58, and were all statistically significant.

In logistic regression models adjusted for thiopurine methyltransferase (TMPT) genotype, 6MP dose intensity, and 6-thiogaunine levels in red cells, significant predictors for over-reporting included older age, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.07 for every 1-year increase in age (P = .04); Hispanic origin (OR 2.4, P = .02); Asian origin, (OR 3.1 P = .02; African-American origin (OR 5.3, P < .001); paternal education level lower than college (OR 2.1, P = .02); and 6MP non-adherence (OR 8.6, P < .0001).

Dr. Landier noted that 78.6% of over-reporters were non-adherent, compared with only 2% of perfect reporters.

“The real importance of this paper from my perspective is this: there is a famous quote that if the patient doesn’t take the medication it can’t work and in an era where we’re trying to improve the care of patients, one of the things we oftentimes forget that if the medication isn’t being taken, the patient can’t get better from it,” said Dr. Mark Crowther, Professor and Chair in the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Crowther moderated a briefing where Dr. Cserti-Gazdewich presented the data.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and from St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Landier and Dr. Crowther reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – Pill containers are not known for eloquence, but they tell a disturbing tale of patient over-reporting of adherence to essential leukemia maintenance therapy.

Among 416 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission, the number of days patients or their guardians reported that the child took his/her daily oral 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) for maintenance was significantly higher than the number of days the pill bottles were opened, as reported by an electronic medication management system.

“Over-reporting was more likely in patients who were non-adherent, older, of non-white race, and came from households with lower paternal education,” said Dr. Wendy Landier from the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

The results suggest that patient self-reports of adherence to 6MP oral maintenance therapy may be unreliable, and should be taken with a grain of salt, Dr. Landier said in a briefing at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

The investigators had previously reported that poor adherence to oral 6MP maintenance therapy was associated with a nealy four-fold increased risk for relapse (JCO 30[17]:2094-101, Blood 124[15]:2345-53).

To better understand why some patients are poorly adherent to 6MP maintenance therapy, the investigator provided 416 children with ALL in first remission with pill containers equipped with a Medication Event Management System (MEMS) that electronically recorded the dates and times that each pill bottle was opened over a 16-week period. Patients age 12 and older or the parents/guardians of younger children were also asked to report the date and time of each daily oral dose at the end of each 28-day study month.

The authors collected and evaluated a total of 1344 patient-months of self-report and MEMS data, compared the records, and stratified patients as either “perfect reporters”, whose self-reports matched the objective MEMS data; “over-reporters”, who self-report exceeded the MEMS data on 5 or more days per month for more than half of study months, and “others.”The median patient age at study entry was 6 years (range 2 to 20 years).

The authors reported in their study that 40.4% of patients were not adherent to oral 6MP therapy, as evidence by a mismatch between self-report and objective (MEMS) reporting.

The overall adjusted mean number of self-reported days per month that patients took their pills ranged from a low of 25.8+5.3 to a high of 26.1+4.5. The pill bottles, however, told a different tale, reporting that they had been opened from a low of 22.8 ± 6.4 to a high of 25.4 ± 4.5 days per month.

Month-by-month correlations between self-report and MEMS 0.36 to 0.58, and were all statistically significant.

In logistic regression models adjusted for thiopurine methyltransferase (TMPT) genotype, 6MP dose intensity, and 6-thiogaunine levels in red cells, significant predictors for over-reporting included older age, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.07 for every 1-year increase in age (P = .04); Hispanic origin (OR 2.4, P = .02); Asian origin, (OR 3.1 P = .02; African-American origin (OR 5.3, P < .001); paternal education level lower than college (OR 2.1, P = .02); and 6MP non-adherence (OR 8.6, P < .0001).

Dr. Landier noted that 78.6% of over-reporters were non-adherent, compared with only 2% of perfect reporters.

“The real importance of this paper from my perspective is this: there is a famous quote that if the patient doesn’t take the medication it can’t work and in an era where we’re trying to improve the care of patients, one of the things we oftentimes forget that if the medication isn’t being taken, the patient can’t get better from it,” said Dr. Mark Crowther, Professor and Chair in the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Crowther moderated a briefing where Dr. Cserti-Gazdewich presented the data.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and from St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Landier and Dr. Crowther reported no relevant conflicts of interest.