Distinct paths in the development of AML
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 09:52
Display Headline
Acute myeloid leukemia genomic classification and prognosis

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of at least 11 disease classes that represent distinct paths in the evolution of AML and have prognostic implications, based on an analysis of somatic driver mutations in 1,540 patients.

In total, 5,234 driver mutations were identified in 76 genes or regions, with 96% of patients having at least one mutation and 86% having two or more mutations. However, nearly one-half of the cohort did not fall into one of the molecular groups defined by the World Health Organization in 2008.

Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D.

“The characterization of many new leukemia genes, multiple driver mutations per patient, and complex co-mutation patterns prompted us to reevaluate genomic classification of AML from the beginning,” wrote Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D., a molecular geneticist at Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, and of the Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9; 374:2209-21).

The team developed a Bayesian statistical model to define 11 mutually exclusive subtypes based on patterns of co-mutations. The schema unambiguously classified 1,236 of 1,540 patients (80%) into a single subgroup and 56 (4%) into two or more groups. A subset of patients (166, 11%) remained unclassified, possibly due to mutations in genes not sequenced in the study.

NPM1-mutated AML was the largest class (27% of the cohort), followed by the chromatin-spliceosome group (18% of the cohort) that included mutations in genes regulating RNA splicing (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2), chromatin (ASXL1, STAG2, BCOR, MLLPTD, EZH2, and PHF6), or transcription (RUNX1). Another subgroup consisted of mutations in TP53, as well as complex karyotype alterations, cytogenetically visible copy-number alterations (aneuploidies), or a combination. While broader than previous classifications, such as “monosomal karyotype AML” and “complex karyotype AML,” this group emerged from correlated chromosomal abnormalities and was mutually exclusive of other class-defining lesions. In general, patients in this group were older and had fewer RAS pathway mutations.

The groups had considerable differences in clinical presentation and overall survival, according to the report. The TP53-aneuploidy subgroup had poor outcomes, as previously described. Patients in the chromatin-spliceosome group had lower rates of response to induction chemotherapy, higher relapse rates, and poorer long-term outcomes, compared with other groups. Most of these patients (84%) would be classified as intermediate risk under current guidelines, but the characteristics were more similar to those of subgroups with adverse outcomes.

Overall survival was correlated with the number of driver mutations, and deleterious affects of mutations often were found to be additive. In some cases, complex gene interactions accounted for variation in outcomes, suggesting the clinical effect of some driver mutations may depend on the occurrence of co-mutations in a wider genomic context.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

The study by Papaemmanuil and her colleagues offers practice-changing insights that redefine molecular classification of AML. The mutational analysis of more than 1,500 AML patients provides a deeper understanding of the specific paths from normal blood cell to leukemia.

Specific concurrent mutations were linked to clinical outcomes. For example, co-mutations in NPM1, FLT3ITD, and DNMT3A are associated with a poor clinical outcome, but NPM1 and DNMT3A mutations without FLT3ITD are associated with better outcomes. In addition, mutations in NPM1 and DNMT3A in the presence of NRASG12/13 are associated with a more favorable outcome. The evolution of DNMT3A-NPM1 mutated clones along separate paths appears to affect disease outcome and may be relevant to clinical trials in AML subgroups.

Dr. Aaron Viny

Previous, smaller studies had suggested that somatic mutations in splicing factors and chromatin modifiers were specific for secondary AML that arises from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Papaemmanuil and her colleagues provide extensive data to support that hypothesis. Patients with chromatin-spliceosome mutations, previously classified as intermediate-risk AML, are classed into the same molecular subgroup as patients with secondary AML arising from MDS.

These data may inform the design of mechanism-based clinical trials based on the presence of specific mutations and co-mutations.

Dr. Aaron Viny is a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. Dr. Ross Levine is Director of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Center for Hematologic Malignancies. These remarks were part of an editorial accompanying a report in The New England Journal of Medicine (2016 Jun 9; 374:2282-4). Dr. Levine reports personal fees from Foundation Medicine outside the submitted work.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

The study by Papaemmanuil and her colleagues offers practice-changing insights that redefine molecular classification of AML. The mutational analysis of more than 1,500 AML patients provides a deeper understanding of the specific paths from normal blood cell to leukemia.

Specific concurrent mutations were linked to clinical outcomes. For example, co-mutations in NPM1, FLT3ITD, and DNMT3A are associated with a poor clinical outcome, but NPM1 and DNMT3A mutations without FLT3ITD are associated with better outcomes. In addition, mutations in NPM1 and DNMT3A in the presence of NRASG12/13 are associated with a more favorable outcome. The evolution of DNMT3A-NPM1 mutated clones along separate paths appears to affect disease outcome and may be relevant to clinical trials in AML subgroups.

Dr. Aaron Viny

Previous, smaller studies had suggested that somatic mutations in splicing factors and chromatin modifiers were specific for secondary AML that arises from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Papaemmanuil and her colleagues provide extensive data to support that hypothesis. Patients with chromatin-spliceosome mutations, previously classified as intermediate-risk AML, are classed into the same molecular subgroup as patients with secondary AML arising from MDS.

These data may inform the design of mechanism-based clinical trials based on the presence of specific mutations and co-mutations.

Dr. Aaron Viny is a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. Dr. Ross Levine is Director of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Center for Hematologic Malignancies. These remarks were part of an editorial accompanying a report in The New England Journal of Medicine (2016 Jun 9; 374:2282-4). Dr. Levine reports personal fees from Foundation Medicine outside the submitted work.

Body

The study by Papaemmanuil and her colleagues offers practice-changing insights that redefine molecular classification of AML. The mutational analysis of more than 1,500 AML patients provides a deeper understanding of the specific paths from normal blood cell to leukemia.

Specific concurrent mutations were linked to clinical outcomes. For example, co-mutations in NPM1, FLT3ITD, and DNMT3A are associated with a poor clinical outcome, but NPM1 and DNMT3A mutations without FLT3ITD are associated with better outcomes. In addition, mutations in NPM1 and DNMT3A in the presence of NRASG12/13 are associated with a more favorable outcome. The evolution of DNMT3A-NPM1 mutated clones along separate paths appears to affect disease outcome and may be relevant to clinical trials in AML subgroups.

Dr. Aaron Viny

Previous, smaller studies had suggested that somatic mutations in splicing factors and chromatin modifiers were specific for secondary AML that arises from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Papaemmanuil and her colleagues provide extensive data to support that hypothesis. Patients with chromatin-spliceosome mutations, previously classified as intermediate-risk AML, are classed into the same molecular subgroup as patients with secondary AML arising from MDS.

These data may inform the design of mechanism-based clinical trials based on the presence of specific mutations and co-mutations.

Dr. Aaron Viny is a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. Dr. Ross Levine is Director of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Center for Hematologic Malignancies. These remarks were part of an editorial accompanying a report in The New England Journal of Medicine (2016 Jun 9; 374:2282-4). Dr. Levine reports personal fees from Foundation Medicine outside the submitted work.

Title
Distinct paths in the development of AML
Distinct paths in the development of AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of at least 11 disease classes that represent distinct paths in the evolution of AML and have prognostic implications, based on an analysis of somatic driver mutations in 1,540 patients.

In total, 5,234 driver mutations were identified in 76 genes or regions, with 96% of patients having at least one mutation and 86% having two or more mutations. However, nearly one-half of the cohort did not fall into one of the molecular groups defined by the World Health Organization in 2008.

Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D.

“The characterization of many new leukemia genes, multiple driver mutations per patient, and complex co-mutation patterns prompted us to reevaluate genomic classification of AML from the beginning,” wrote Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D., a molecular geneticist at Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, and of the Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9; 374:2209-21).

The team developed a Bayesian statistical model to define 11 mutually exclusive subtypes based on patterns of co-mutations. The schema unambiguously classified 1,236 of 1,540 patients (80%) into a single subgroup and 56 (4%) into two or more groups. A subset of patients (166, 11%) remained unclassified, possibly due to mutations in genes not sequenced in the study.

NPM1-mutated AML was the largest class (27% of the cohort), followed by the chromatin-spliceosome group (18% of the cohort) that included mutations in genes regulating RNA splicing (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2), chromatin (ASXL1, STAG2, BCOR, MLLPTD, EZH2, and PHF6), or transcription (RUNX1). Another subgroup consisted of mutations in TP53, as well as complex karyotype alterations, cytogenetically visible copy-number alterations (aneuploidies), or a combination. While broader than previous classifications, such as “monosomal karyotype AML” and “complex karyotype AML,” this group emerged from correlated chromosomal abnormalities and was mutually exclusive of other class-defining lesions. In general, patients in this group were older and had fewer RAS pathway mutations.

The groups had considerable differences in clinical presentation and overall survival, according to the report. The TP53-aneuploidy subgroup had poor outcomes, as previously described. Patients in the chromatin-spliceosome group had lower rates of response to induction chemotherapy, higher relapse rates, and poorer long-term outcomes, compared with other groups. Most of these patients (84%) would be classified as intermediate risk under current guidelines, but the characteristics were more similar to those of subgroups with adverse outcomes.

Overall survival was correlated with the number of driver mutations, and deleterious affects of mutations often were found to be additive. In some cases, complex gene interactions accounted for variation in outcomes, suggesting the clinical effect of some driver mutations may depend on the occurrence of co-mutations in a wider genomic context.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of at least 11 disease classes that represent distinct paths in the evolution of AML and have prognostic implications, based on an analysis of somatic driver mutations in 1,540 patients.

In total, 5,234 driver mutations were identified in 76 genes or regions, with 96% of patients having at least one mutation and 86% having two or more mutations. However, nearly one-half of the cohort did not fall into one of the molecular groups defined by the World Health Organization in 2008.

Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D.

“The characterization of many new leukemia genes, multiple driver mutations per patient, and complex co-mutation patterns prompted us to reevaluate genomic classification of AML from the beginning,” wrote Elli Papaemmanuil, Ph.D., a molecular geneticist at Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, and of the Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9; 374:2209-21).

The team developed a Bayesian statistical model to define 11 mutually exclusive subtypes based on patterns of co-mutations. The schema unambiguously classified 1,236 of 1,540 patients (80%) into a single subgroup and 56 (4%) into two or more groups. A subset of patients (166, 11%) remained unclassified, possibly due to mutations in genes not sequenced in the study.

NPM1-mutated AML was the largest class (27% of the cohort), followed by the chromatin-spliceosome group (18% of the cohort) that included mutations in genes regulating RNA splicing (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2), chromatin (ASXL1, STAG2, BCOR, MLLPTD, EZH2, and PHF6), or transcription (RUNX1). Another subgroup consisted of mutations in TP53, as well as complex karyotype alterations, cytogenetically visible copy-number alterations (aneuploidies), or a combination. While broader than previous classifications, such as “monosomal karyotype AML” and “complex karyotype AML,” this group emerged from correlated chromosomal abnormalities and was mutually exclusive of other class-defining lesions. In general, patients in this group were older and had fewer RAS pathway mutations.

The groups had considerable differences in clinical presentation and overall survival, according to the report. The TP53-aneuploidy subgroup had poor outcomes, as previously described. Patients in the chromatin-spliceosome group had lower rates of response to induction chemotherapy, higher relapse rates, and poorer long-term outcomes, compared with other groups. Most of these patients (84%) would be classified as intermediate risk under current guidelines, but the characteristics were more similar to those of subgroups with adverse outcomes.

Overall survival was correlated with the number of driver mutations, and deleterious affects of mutations often were found to be additive. In some cases, complex gene interactions accounted for variation in outcomes, suggesting the clinical effect of some driver mutations may depend on the occurrence of co-mutations in a wider genomic context.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Acute myeloid leukemia genomic classification and prognosis
Display Headline
Acute myeloid leukemia genomic classification and prognosis
Click for Credit Status
Active
Article Source

FROM NEJM

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Mutational analysis of 1,540 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) identified 11 distinct classes with prognostic implications.

Major finding: In total, 5,234 driver mutations were identified involving 76 genes or regions; 96% of patients had at least one driver mutation, and 86% had two or more.

Data sources: Samples came from three prospective multicenter clinical trials of the German-Austrian AML Study Group: AMLHD98A, AML-HD98B, and AMLSG-07-04.

Disclosures: Dr. Papaemmanuil and most coauthors reported having no disclosures. Two coauthors reported financial ties to industry sources.